View Full Version : 3D or not 3D?

02-09-2004, 01:31 AM
There's all this ballyhoo about the screenshots indicating in some way that the environments are not 3D - I don't see it. The environments in the screenies could very easily be real-time 3D rendered. They're too blurry to be sure either way, but I don't see evidence to contradict Stemmle and CGW. If they say its all real-time 3D, then so it shall be.

Oh, and hi everybody, btw.

02-09-2004, 10:01 PM
It's just the lack of perspective change between the two shots of the office that make people wonder. (And people like myself like to over-speculate when things like "first in game Sam & Max screenshots" hits the Web)

02-12-2004, 06:34 PM
This is just a 2d test post ;)

02-12-2004, 09:57 PM
Fortunately we were wrong :P

02-13-2004, 12:51 PM
What the hell is Ballyhoo?

Are you australian?

02-13-2004, 05:39 PM
Ballyhoo (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=ballyhoo). See also: Hoopla (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hoopla).

02-13-2004, 05:40 PM
The 3D look very good in this game (in my opinion :cool:), but i would like that the game would have options for low-potency pc's as Mike said.

James Isaac
02-20-2004, 11:56 AM
I think 3D is good. I think LucasArts should take a step forward and try new things until they work, instead of just sticking with what they have. :D

02-20-2004, 07:17 PM
Hoopla is'nt that a New Orleans dish?