View Full Version : Is the terrain changing enough?
09-29-2008, 05:06 PM
I've heard alot of talk about this game being an overly praised tech demo. That it couldn't sustain a whole game. Do you guys think that this game will be good? I played the demo which I liked alot but I don't think I would spend $60 on it (same goes for Force Unleashed).
09-29-2008, 06:28 PM
I do think it should be cheaper. I'll wait for it to come out and see what people say.
09-30-2008, 05:29 AM
I think the key factor is whether or not the other elements of the game can hold their own. :)
09-30-2008, 07:45 PM
Yeah. The whole premise is still sort of a Gears of War-eseque third person shooter. The terrain changing element is a big feature and will hopefully complement the game's underlying elements.
10-01-2008, 01:10 AM
I'd buy because I want to see how the terrain-changing thing works out in multiplayer. Using the terrain deformation would completely upturn the standard way most shooters are played.
Ctrl Alt Del
10-02-2008, 02:37 PM
Terrain deformation capabilities is the "revolutionary" aspect every game nowadays seems to claim for itself. That said, while the idea may be good without a decent level design, a good AI and, damn, fun gameplay, what's it besides a wasted good idea?
10-02-2008, 07:29 PM
They should've used the terraforming aspect in one of those fun physics games, rather than an all too common shooter. It seems that for a game to be revolutionary or new these days, it has to be a shooter. I say no.
10-02-2008, 07:39 PM
10-02-2008, 11:22 PM
10-03-2008, 06:15 AM
That is sweet.
10-03-2008, 03:24 PM
I'd give the comic a lol. Where did you find it?
10-09-2008, 07:07 PM
Awsome comic lol!
10-26-2008, 03:01 PM
Funny really shows how stupid the plot its....
04-26-2009, 09:28 AM
Nice Comic! The other dude has a point you know. "sinking the country and building a new continent".
vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.