View Full Version : Lt. Michael Behenna behind bars for eliminating terrorist

Darth Avlectus
04-27-2012, 10:00 PM
Just learned about this today, would have posted it sooner had I known sooner:

On March 20th, 2009, Army Ranger 1st Lieutenant Michael Behenna was sentenced to 25 years in prison for killing Ali Mansur, a known Al Qaeda operative while serving in Iraq. Mansur was known to be a member of an Al Qaeda cell operating in the lieutenant’s area of operation and Army intelligence believed he organized an attack on Lt. Behenna’s platoon in April 2008 which killed two U.S. soldiers and injured two more. Army intelligence ordered the release of Mansur and Lt. Behenna was ordered to return the terrorist to his home.

During the return of Mansur, Lt. Behenna again questioned the Al Qaeda member for information about other members of the terrorist cell, and financial supporters. During this interrogation, Mansur attacked Lt. Behenna, who killed the terrorist in self-defense. The government subsequently prosecuted Lt. Behenna for premeditated murder.

Not only is this a miscarriage of justice on the behalf of Lt. Behenna, who was acting to prevent further loss of life in his platoon, it is demoralizing to the U.S. troops who continue to fight on behalf of the freedom and security of our nation. Whether it is U.S. border patrol agents, members of the armed forces, or FBI agents, no individual who is serving on the frontlines in the War on Terror should be so blatantly mistreated.

We urgently need your help to correct this terrible wrong against a loyal and faithful soldier. Please contact your congressman and ask them to intervene on behalf of 1LT Behenna. Below is a brief recap of the relevant aspects of Lt. Behenna’s case.

September 2007: 1LT Michael Behenna deployed to Iraq for his first tour of combat.
April 21, 2008, Al Qa’ida operatives attacked LT Behennaʼs platoon. The
IED attack resulted in the death of two of LT Behennaʼs platoon members, two Iraqi citizens, and wounded two additional soldiers under LT Behennaʼs command.
May 5, 2008: Based on information from US Army intelligence, LT Behenna’s platoon detained known terrorist Ali Mansur at his home for the attack on LT Behennaʼs platoon. Mansur had illegal weapons and a passport indicating trips to Syria.
May 16, 2008: Without explanation, Army Intelligence ordered the release of Mansur.
LT Behenna, who lost two members of his platoon just weeks earlier, was ordered to transport Mansur to his home.
LT Behenna attempted a final field interview of Mansur prior to his release.
During the interview, Mansur attacked LT Behenna, and LT Behenna reacted to defend himself by firing two shots which killed Mansur.
July 2008: The U.S. Army charged LT Behenna with premeditated murder for the death of the Al Qa’ida operative and terrorist Ali Mansur
February 23, 2009: 1Lt. Behennaʼs trial begins.
Defense experts testify that Mansur was standing with his arm outstretched when shot.
On the evening of February 25th, prosecution expert witness Dr. Herbert MacDonell told the prosecution attorneys the only logical explanation for what happened was that Mansur had to be standing, reaching for LT Behennaʼs gun when he was shot. This contradicted the prosecution’s theory that Mansur was executed while seated on a rock.
On February 26th LT Behenna testified that while he was interrogating Mansur he turned his head towards his interpreter, and when he did, Mansur lunged for his gun. The LT fired a controlled pair of shots. This explanation was identical to what Dr. MacDonell told the prosecution team in a private meeting the night before.
During a recess after 1LT Behennaʼs testimony, Dr. MacDonell met with the prosecution team and told them again that the LT’s testimony was exactly what he had demonstrated to Prosecutors the day before and that the LT must be telling the truth. The prosecutors sent Dr. MacDonell home to New York. Leaving the courtroom, Dr. MacDonell told defense counsel he would have made a great witness for LT Behenna.
The defense counsel asked prosecutors if they have any exculpatory evidence about Dr. MacDonell, and the prosecutors denied possession of such evidence.
In the prosecution’s closing arguments they argued LT Behennaʼs testimony that Mansur was reaching for his gun was “impossible” based upon the evidence (despite knowing that their own expert witness had told him it was the only logical explanation.)
Later that Friday night a military panel of seven officers, none of whom had combat experience, convicted LT Behenna of unpremeditated murder and assault.
After LT Behenna was convicted, but before sentencing, Dr. MacDonell sent an email to the prosecution team requesting that the information provided in his demonstration be turned over to the defense.
A mistrial was requested by the LT’s defense counsel, but on March 20, the military judge denied both defense motions to declare a mistrial and to order a new trial.
LT Behennaʼs attorneys are appealing the verdict based on the denial of a fair trial. An oral argument has been scheduled before the highest military court – The Court of Appeals of the Armed Forces – on 23 April 2012 in Washington D.C.
LT Behenna is currently serving a 15-year sentence in Ft. Leavenworth (the original 25 year sentence was reduced five years by the commanding General of 101st Airborne and the Army Clemency Board reduced it another five years.) The earliest he would be eligible for parole is after serving a third of his sentence. Without parole or a new trial Lt. Behenna will get out of prison for the shooting an Al Qaeda terrorist in self defense when he is 40 years old.

1st Lieutenant Michael Behenna was an excellent officer. He received his call to serve his country while attending the University of Central Oklahoma. He is from a family of public servants, his mother being an Assistant United States Attorney and his father a retired Special Agent with the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation. He has served the Army and the United States with honor and dignity.

Spread the word today. Don't let this injustice stand!

04-28-2012, 12:36 AM
More pathetic political bs and handwringing. He should get a freaking medal or something, not a prison sentence.

04-28-2012, 03:01 AM
More pathetic political bs and handwringing. He should get a freaking medal or something, not a prison sentence.

Yeah sounds like political BS alright, and I'm thinking maybe they're really leaving the Lieutenant to hang like that because the upper brass believes the Lieutenant screwed up somekind of intelligence operation they had going on with Mansur. The main reason I say that is because of this specific quote, if it's true:

"May 16, 2008: Without explanation, Army Intelligence ordered the release of Mansur."

And Lt. Behenna was to transport Mansur home, right? So if the guy was a known terrorist, the U.S. Army is not just going to let the enemy free like that without a sane reason. So the only logical reason that I can think of, is because the Army Intelligence wanted to let Mansur go to keep track of him to see if he would lead them into finding other terrorists or a whole terrorist group. Unfortunately that feel by the wayside because Mansur got killed, so probably the Army Intelligence got pissed at what happened and some A-hole in the upper brass decided to have Lt. Behenna prosecuted because of it and turn it into a political BS case.

Basically, I can't see the U.S. Army really giving a crap to what ever happen to Mansur in the end (that includes being shot on purpose), after the upper brass got what they wanted beforehand.

04-30-2012, 10:46 AM
Um, we tend to frown on people independently deciding to execute people without any due process. Regardless of what a piece of **** Mansur may have been, some dip**** Lieutenant doesn't get to make the call to kill him in cold blood.

Darth Avlectus
04-30-2012, 11:23 AM
Yes I've since learned more. The forensics, pre the coverup grenade, did not conclusively say murder but since a grenade was used to try to cover it up...that pretty much screws over anything that might have been usable in defense regardless.

One realizes there's a conduct code to discourage this sort of thing, but it ultimately that does not stop anyone from acting as we see here.

I'd say it was still a bad call to have the battalion which was attacked take the guy home. May not have been anyone else to do it though. I'm left with a bit of a frown at this whole thing.