View Full Version : are jedis harder than at-at's??
09-12-2001, 12:28 PM
so in gb who would win in a fight is is a)an at-at:atat: or b) a jedi:ben: ???
09-12-2001, 04:13 PM
Well, a jedi could just cloak and run away, but in a fight, the ATAT would win. Unless he could convert the ATAT, he really has no chance. The jedi is really a anti-infantry unit, and i don't think that they will be particurally effective against ATATs.
Trade Fed Ed
09-12-2001, 05:01 PM
i think yes, the jedi could just deflect laser shots and would be able to just destroy the legs of the atat. it might be a pretty long fight though:atat:
09-12-2001, 05:05 PM
The AT-AT would win by a MILE!
.....unless the Jedi had a graping hook and a thermal detonator! ;)
09-12-2001, 10:13 PM
I like Jedi. They are awesome. But unless they have a thermal detonator or a hvy. explosives they might win.
Without that equipment they wouldn't win against a AT-AT
09-12-2001, 11:14 PM
It has been proven that Jedi cannot reflect laser, but they do have increased health. But even still an At-At would take the Jedi out in a second.:atat: :ben:
09-13-2001, 11:15 AM
Jedi are flesh and bone and at-at's are made of metal, so of course :atat: are harder!
09-13-2001, 04:35 PM
An example of what would happen,
:atat: = = = = = = :ben:
vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.