BCanr2d2
03-28-2003, 04:03 AM
The big thing at the moment seems to be the rumour that EA will not publish many of their yearly updated sports games on the XBOX console. It all seems to stem from their decision to try and get their own LIVE servers, rather than doing what MS has asked, and allowing MS to run it.
It looks like EA wanted to be able to remove the support for the superceded games on LIVE, and force the consumer to upgrade to the newest version, although this is only conjecture. Whilst they have only come to this decision recently, it is one that has been 2 or more years in the making. No doubt they would've had been given briefings on what LIVE was, and how it was setup before the console had been released.
EA seems stubborn enough to not give up on their current yearly updates for each game, which I doubt they would provide roster changes and uniform updates for. It would remove the main reason to buy their new games, which seem to only slightly change graphically from year to year.
They do distribute other games, from other developers that will support LIVE, but since they don't develop them, they can't really make the decision not to support LIVE on these games...
I know who will win, but are EA shooting themselves in the head, and not in the foot at this tactic?
It looks like EA wanted to be able to remove the support for the superceded games on LIVE, and force the consumer to upgrade to the newest version, although this is only conjecture. Whilst they have only come to this decision recently, it is one that has been 2 or more years in the making. No doubt they would've had been given briefings on what LIVE was, and how it was setup before the console had been released.
EA seems stubborn enough to not give up on their current yearly updates for each game, which I doubt they would provide roster changes and uniform updates for. It would remove the main reason to buy their new games, which seem to only slightly change graphically from year to year.
They do distribute other games, from other developers that will support LIVE, but since they don't develop them, they can't really make the decision not to support LIVE on these games...
I know who will win, but are EA shooting themselves in the head, and not in the foot at this tactic?