![]() |
The Da Vinci Code.
Discuss.
|
SUCKS.
It wants to be all deep and ****, but the lack of research and the Grisham like writing (based on the little I've read of it) makes the whole thing a joke. (And that was my line and a half review.) |
I found it entertaining.
That is, I didn't find it boring. That's the only good thing I can say about it. The plot strangely reminded me of Gabriel Knight 3. But GK3 was better because it had vampires and stuff. |
Quote:
That said, I haven't yet seen the Da Vinci Code, but I may do. |
Yeah, I think I agree with both Remi *and* Jayel here. Entertaining but not very good. I've heard reading it as being compared to eating a double-cheesburger: not very good, but nice all the same.
If you want more of the same but in the form of critically aclaimed literature, then you can't go wrong with Umberto Eco |
The only thing that annoys me about the Da Vinci code is that I was interested in this Rennes Le Chateax stuff years ago and everyone thinks it's some kind of new thing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ha, said as though you two wouldn't be living it up if you just wrote the highest selling book since Harry Potter ;)
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.