LucasForums

LucasForums (http://www.lucasforums.com/index.php)
-   Forces of Corruption (http://www.lucasforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=682)
-   -   IG-88 vs. Death Star (http://www.lucasforums.com/showthread.php?t=173913)

Docter_Aap 12-27-2006 10:21 AM

IG-88 vs. Death Star
 
I personally think it sucks. I mean the Consortium doesnt have to do anything hard. Just pay the money and blow up a 1-build-limit battle station, the surrounding fleet, and the planet below it. That's just unfair.

Darth Anarch 12-28-2006 01:17 PM

But then again, can't the Empire just build another Death Star? And IG-88 is gone forever after he blows up the first one, correct?

YertyL 12-28-2006 01:49 PM

No, they cannot - which btw. makes sense since else an Imp player could just say "Here comes my second DS - GG ZC player :) "

jedi jim 1989 12-28-2006 08:48 PM

also in cannon (i no this game isnt exactly cannon) i believe that the death star nearly bankrupt the empire or something (not 100% but im sure i herd that or read it somewhere)

Docter_Aap 12-29-2006 05:38 AM

It also destroyed Naboo. it had an expensive base and it was full of expensive units (DT III, ATATs)

JoesGuy 01-08-2007 11:52 PM

Aw what's wrong? Baby's widdle Empire is being threatened by a single droid? This is why I enjoyed the Zann Consortium Campaign. It gives the Empire (and you Empire enthusiasts) something to really worry about. But then, you can always build another, right?

Not that I've ever used this feature, I really like IG-88. :)

JoesGuy 01-08-2007 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Docter_Aap
It also destroyed Naboo. it had an expensive base and it was full of expensive units (DT III, ATATs)

Sorry for the double post, but when you say destroyed you don't mean physically "blown up" do you? If so, I believe the second Death Star only destroyed one planet and it wasn't Naboo.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.