Originally Posted by Kurgan
Agreed. I know his other stuff is much disputed nowadays as well, I was merely referring to his "theories" on religion. Still, no matter how debunked some of his ideas have been, they still get brought up as fact by people every so often, usually without realizing who said them or why.
Tell me about it. Doesn't work wonders for the credibility of psychology to support quacks like Freud, Young, and Gardener.