Originally Posted by Mace MacLeod
Um...yes it is. The context of money being useless in the future presupposes conditions which are not present now. The circumstances which may at some undefined time in the future that might be decades, centuries or even millenia away that might render trading capital or trade media irrelevant cannot be retroactively applied. It's like saying, "Crossbows are obsolete tactical military weapons now, so crossbows must always have been obsolete." Doesn't work that way.
Oh, you is going to give me a example about crossbows.
You still don't understand my question.
I am not saying that money was always obsolete.
I was saying that if you continue to defend the use of money.
Then you are saying that money will ultimately and absolutely will have the final
word on the fate of our society.