Originally Posted by ET Warrior
That's not a logical inference from the quote. It would be similar to me saying "I am wearing pants, and therefore am not completely naked", and you deducing that I'm saying that anytime that I am not wearing pants I am completely naked.
The logic of the statement goes something to the effect of "If A then B". However, negating A does not inherently negate B unless it has been stated.
Heh, with his responses to this topic we are discussing, I will say with that circumstantial evidence of that quote he seem to be arguing that Atheists rational beliefs are superior and highly moral in comparison to religious people.
I highly doubt otherwise.
But I could be clouded by his arrogance