Thread: Gobekli Tepe
View Single Post
Old 01-28-2009, 04:19 AM   #4
Qui-Gon Glenn
@Qui-Gon Glenn
Digory Kirke's Bafflement
Qui-Gon Glenn's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Irune
Posts: 1,492
Current Game: KotOR awww yeah
Folder extraordinaire  Helpful!  Forum Veteran  Veteran Modder 
Well, I am also no expert on ancient civs or their technology. However, as a logician of fair quality, I can say that this theory doesn't seem to follow real well.
Originally Posted by Article
To carve, erect and bury rings of seven-ton stone pillars would have required hundreds of workers, all needing to be fed and housed. Hence the eventual emergence of settled communities in the area around 10,000 years ago. "This shows sociocultural changes come first, agriculture comes later," says Stanford University archaeologist Ian Hodder.
Huh? I suppose that is a possibility, but no where in that paragraph or anywhere else in the article is a well demonstrated model showing us this implication. The quote actually seems to contradict itself... saying more for the weakness of his argument than I ever could.

I would argue that we have sold the Ancient's technological skills far too short. It is at least as supported by evidence than Hodder's conclusion. 100% intuition.... which is fine for me, as I am not a scientist.

Last edited by Qui-Gon Glenn; 01-28-2009 at 12:52 PM. Reason: grammar
Qui-Gon Glenn is offline   you may: quote & reply,