Originally Posted by GarfieldJL
The intelligence thing I brought up was subject to peer review as well. Never take any study involving race or religion at face value.
That isn't an argument. Like SkinWalker said, if you can demonstrate the bias of the researchers and back it up with evidence and/or show a flaw in their methods, that would be an argument, simply saying "they're biased because they're part of academia" without even giving evidence of such is not a valid argument.