Originally Posted by GarfieldJL
the burden of proof is on the researcher in a research study
Indeed. And this is exactly what Skinwalker provided us with. I'm sure you've noticed that anyone here but you considers the research study to be empirically valid.
You do not. Please demonstrate why we should believe you. And do so by referring to the empirical data, not Nyborg's history.
So far, your treatment of this research study is akin to saying that Harry Potter sucks because Rowling has a history of writing bad books. Without actually having read Harry Potter.