Originally Posted by GarfieldJL
Thank you, it wasn't hard considering it was on page one.
It is much more entertaining to watch the back and forth as the staff of wikipedia tries to explain themselves.
We have to remember that history is written by the victor. Wikipedia should have executed their unbiased stance; thus, allowing the inclusion of Obama's past affiliations.
Wikipedia should remember - Obama's personal associations are not based upon opinion. They have proven to be facts.
I don't know if there is any debating on this subject, but it is a topic of interest to some people. - Yar.