Originally Posted by PastramiX
Alright, but if you apply the same logic toward Newsbusters, then how do you know that it's 100% accurate?
Newsbusters tends to be accurate because they take the time to actually source things often the very things they are reporting about. It's also why some bloggers such as littlegreenfootballs and Drudge Report are more credible than some other blog sites.
Fact is though in this wikipedia situation, there is quite a bit of evidence to prove the wikipedia staff have been behaving in an unethical manner.