View Single Post
Old 03-09-2009, 07:23 PM   #17
Status: Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,856
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
Umm, your point?

There is no requirement for them to act "ethically" by your standards.
Well actually there is, it adds to the growing concern about the mainstream media being ran by Obama's Chief of Staff. Additionally, if wikipedia is a nonprofit they can get in serious trouble from a legal standpoint, furthermore they could potentially get in trouble for false advertising.

Seriously, they advertise as trying their best to keep it unbiased, but they deliberately do things to support the Democrats, that's false advertising. Furthermore, they've also lost credibility to many people.
GarfieldJL is offline   you may: