Originally Posted by SkinWalker
Quite the contrary. I'm very open to revising my conclusions regarding religion.
In a pig's eye!
But, please. Cite the place I've demonstrated a preconceived conclusion to which I'm only willing to see that data which are supportive. The closest thing you might
be able to come to is my assertion that Cheney's office and Libby in particular was responsible for the treasonous act of revealing the identity of an intelligence asset. For this, I admit to being trusting of the Justice system in place but I'm willing to revise should evidence sufficient enough to sway that
system the other way be presented. I defer to the legal system and the special prosecutor, who are experts in the field. I'm not.[/QUOTE]
The same post I quoted earlier in this thread.