Quote:
Originally Posted by EnderWiggin
With all that red tape, it'd probably be pretty damn easy to prove.
_EW_
|
Then let us hope it
stays taped up like that.
I'd say, though, that the 'verified by two physicians' thing should include independent of one another.
Curious: would/could there be allowances made in the form of surveillance records at patent's/patien's party's request (after of course being informed of what privacy they are forgoing etc.)?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimartin
I have not seen anyone advocate murdering terminally ill patients in this thread.
|
Never meant to imply that about anyone here, just speaking in the ultimate sense that it
should be the patient's (well informed) choice. None other.
Quote:
|
I also don’t advocate it being only the patient’s will unless she/he is thoroughly informed by a medical profession about the prognosis. I believe this is a decision that should be made by the patient, their loved ones and medical professional, but the ultimate decision should be the terminally ill person's.
|
I had hoped to imply as much in it being up to the patient, but certianly, thank you for that clarification and show of exceptions.