View Single Post
Old 10-16-2009, 10:31 PM   #140
JesusIsGonnaOwnSatan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Over the bridge from Australia
Posts: 1,218
Originally Posted by Gygas
I can hardly convince myself to install a game that's 6 GB!
personally, i wouldnt mind 50gb games. i don't have an awesome rig or anything, but if i pay $3000 on a computer, i'd want the games to be really spectacular.

Originally Posted by Alexrd
Of course you can play games with a system lower than the minimum requirements, but your gameplay experience will be nothing special.
that reminds me... when i first bought JA 4 years ago a made it run on an ancient 128mb RAM, integrated 8mb graphics card office thing.

then i got a then powerful ex rental pentium 4 and stuck in a 128mb GeForce FX5200 + extra RAM and it serves me well to this day. (manufactured on '02!). it runs games 2005/6 and less (JO, JA, BF, RC, KotOR to name a few) on medium settings quite well.

Originally Posted by Kurgan
That kills me... I am sick and frickin' tired of new games ONLY XP "and up."
well, you know... ME is like, 9 years old....

What are specs to the most powerful computers you have access to, people?
(just to get a more specific sense of USE playability possibility)

The most powerful comp i currently have access to is my dad's media laptop.
OS: Vista SP2
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 @ 2Ghz
HDD: 250gb
RAM: 2gb
Graphics: Nvidia GeForce 8400M GS

Its made for watching movies and playing medium games.
It can of course play my older games really well.
The "highest" game ive played on it is Mass Effect at medium - low settings.

mfw I read the Revan novel

it is not a cry of joy.
JesusIsGonnaOwnSatan is offline   you may: