View Single Post
Old 01-26-2010, 07:38 PM   #4
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Weren't some people here talking about requiring a license to reproduce about a year ago? I can think of no better criterion for such a license than the actual ability to support children instead of leeching off of the rest of the population like Octomom by depending on the state to do it.

Since the whole license thing won't happen in our lifetime, a fair way to handle this would be to allow each prospective Octomom one unsupportable child. Any more, and all government aid gets cut off, including what she was receiving before. If you can't support children, then you shouldn't be having them. It's called "responsible living".


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker

Last edited by Q; 01-26-2010 at 08:19 PM.
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,