Originally Posted by Samnmax221
Sure this was almost a year ago now, but this thing is ridiculous. He completely misses the point of RLM, and spends the whole (terribly formatted) PDF whining about the review style, and rarely attempts to refute anything. I'd call him a sperglord if it didn't look like the definition was going to fall out of favor.
That can be applied to RLM's "review". He completely misses the point of the movie, and spends the whole time criticizing aspects of the movie that he chose to ignore. But I'm proably "missing the point" as so many people say. They use it as a basis for their critcism when it's conveninent, and when rebutted, they say that the point was to be only a joke...