View Single Post
Old 12-24-2001, 07:48 AM   #8
Brownboot
 
Brownboot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Home...
Posts: 2
Question Hmmmm.....

First of all I would just like to say Hi... Hi...

Anyway, I think that FoCom was a great game. It looks way better than Gb looks. I really fell like they kinda just did a really bad job on the graphics for Gb(1 point FC). However, only being able to play two different army types sucked, so Gb is better there, even thought all the armies are almost identical. In AoE the groups had real apparent strengths and weaknesses (1 point Gb). Scaling is really screwed in Gb, too, but we will count that in the graphics... Also, multiplayer for FC is really not fun. The lag gets tremendous when you try to build a medium sized army. Also the 80 units thing is goofy. Better researching and technology makes the game way funner. (2 points Gb) Multiplayer for the AoE engine is really stremlined, and the simple graphics make it run easy...

All points added I would have to say that Gb is really better than FC, even though I think I liked FC better in the SIngle Player sense...


Brownboot is offline   you may: quote & reply,