|
|
 |
07-06-2003, 03:20 PM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mtl,QC,Can!
Posts: 415
|
Warcraft 3 expansion !
In response to the keep this forum alive thread, I ask all of you this : Did any1 else get the expansion for warcraft3 ? I've been playing it for awhile now. I must say that I'm disapointed by the campaigns, but the multiplayer value is great though !
Its how do you say ?
A deal's a deal !
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
|
07-06-2003, 03:22 PM
|
#2
|
|
Dark Cupcake of the Sith
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,035
|
I completly agree with you. IMO, Blizzard has some huge creativity problems. Did you notice all the similarities between TFT and Brood War?
However, multiplayer is just great. I have some problems with the new armors/damage system though...
~Dark Cupcake of the Sith
|
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
|
07-06-2003, 05:24 PM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mtl,QC,Can!
Posts: 415
|
That much is true, but the editor looks nice though. Apparently you can edit spells and all . . .I'm actually making a map of warcraft 3 ! Look for it soon on B.Net.
Its how do you say ?
A deal's a deal !
|
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
|
07-06-2003, 05:46 PM
|
#4
|
|
Wiseass
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 2,282
Current Game: Skyrim
|
I have never actually played warcraft, any of them, are they good?
"Who is splendid among men, who is glorious among heroes?"
--excerpt from Gilgamesh
|
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
|
07-07-2003, 01:53 PM
|
#5
|
|
Dark Cupcake of the Sith
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,035
|
Of course they are 
WC3 is not a normal RTS though... Blizzard used to call it a RPS (Role Playing Strategy). WC2 was good, but is kinda outmatched now... Don't even bother trying WC1.
I'm in the "WC is better than SC" group (gotta like medieval games). WC3 is really the best strategy game I ever played.
~Dark Cupcake of the Sith
|
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
|
07-07-2003, 03:16 PM
|
#6
|
|
Wiseass
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 2,282
Current Game: Skyrim
|
How does it rank up against Command & Conquer?
"Who is splendid among men, who is glorious among heroes?"
--excerpt from Gilgamesh
|
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
|
07-07-2003, 04:28 PM
|
#7
|
|
Dark Cupcake of the Sith
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,035
|
I played C&C Generals for some time, but IMO it's no match for WC3. I got bored of Generals after a couple of weeks...
As for Tiberian Sun and Red Alert, I never really played them.
Anyway, if you are obsessed by guns and tanks, you'll be happier with generals...
At least the sides are diffrent in C&C. I tried to play Rise of Nations, but I find the civilizations not really different from each others.
~Dark Cupcake of the Sith
|
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
|
07-08-2003, 08:51 PM
|
#8
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mtl,QC,Can!
Posts: 415
|
The only problem with warcraft3 is that the counterability of unit types is exagerated. Let's say you get a bunch of archers and the other guy gets a bunch of footmen (with defend which means 75% percent less dmg delt by peircing therefore archers), you are dead no matter how good you are controlling and managing your units. In SC, if you're smart you can still have a chance !
Its how do you say ?
A deal's a deal !
|
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
|
|
|
|
|
|
