lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar

Thread: Dragon Skin in the Military
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 06-11-2009, 01:51 PM   #1
Darth_Yuthura
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,585
Current Game: KOTOR III
Dragon Skin in the Military

This is the kind of subject for Kavar's, but I don't want to discuss it there.

Dragon Skin armour by Pinnacle vs. Interceptor by Point Blank

Dragon Skin was banned by the US military before it was even tested in 2007. Is that because it didn't meet the technical specifications for ballistic protection, or was it politics? Many third-part sources say Dragon Skin is rated at level 5 ballistic protection, but the military claims it doesn't compare to Interceptor armour.

Just like to know what everyone else thinks about this. What would you prefer for our brave soldiers to have in the heat of battle? I would be all for Dragon Skin, as it is the best gear for the job.
Darth_Yuthura is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 02:10 PM   #2
Achilles
Dapper Chimp
 
Achilles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,204
Helpful! Veteran Modder Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
This is the kind of subject for Kavar's, but I don't want to discuss it there.
The Senate Chambers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
Dragon Skin armour by Pinnacle vs. Interceptor by Point Blank

Dragon Skin was banned by the US military before it was even tested in 2007. Is that because it didn't meet the technical specifications for ballistic protection, or was it politics? Many third-part sources say Dragon Skin is rated at level 5 ballistic protection, but the military claims it doesn't compare to Interceptor armour.
Sounds pretty technical. Know of any websites that break down both sides of the argument for us lay-people?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
Just like to know what everyone else thinks about this. What would you prefer for our brave soldiers to have in the heat of battle? I would be all for Dragon Skin, as it is the best gear for the job.
Considering that we do not seem to be able to provide even basic kevlar for our armed forces, I'm wondering how the more expensive, labor-intensive Dragon Skin could ever become a reality. Perhaps for special forces types???
Achilles is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 02:21 PM   #3
Darth_Yuthura
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,585
Current Game: KOTOR III
Point Blank had gotten over $50 million dollars in contracts this year for Interceptor Armour. I would think that US taxpayers would be willing to see that each one of our soldiers is protected by the best body armour, considering that they are risking their lives for us.

You can see youtube videos about it, but sites would include

http://defense-update.com/products/d/dragonskin.htm

http://www.fftt.us/ffttj/index.php?o...-web&Itemid=95

http://www.policelink.com/products/p...skin-bodyarmor
Darth_Yuthura is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 02:28 PM   #4
Achilles
Dapper Chimp
 
Achilles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,204
Helpful! Veteran Modder Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
Point Blank had gotten over $50 million dollars in contracts this year for Interceptor Armour. I would think that US taxpayers would be willing to see that each one of our soldiers is protected by the best body armour, considering that they are risking their lives for us.
I'm sure both of these arguments are sound, however neither one addresses the point that I was making.

If we cannot afford to give every soldier existing, cheaper body armor, then what should lead us to expect that we will be able to provide more expensive stuff that takes longer to make?

I, for one, would prefer we put more money into things that would allow us to avoid putting people in harm's way in the first place.
Achilles is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 02:51 PM   #5
Darth_Yuthura
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,585
Current Game: KOTOR III
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achilles View Post
I, for one, would prefer we put more money into things that would allow us to avoid putting people in harm's way in the first place.
I would have preferred that the US not invade Iraq either, but they're already committed; they're there. Now the issue is to do whatever we can to support them until they can be pulled out. It would be better to do whatever it takes to get them out of harm's way, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't give them the best protection for the job in the meantime.
Darth_Yuthura is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 03:01 PM   #6
Achilles
Dapper Chimp
 
Achilles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,204
Helpful! Veteran Modder Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
I would have preferred that the US not invade Iraq either, but they're already committed; they're there.
I'm not limiting my argument to Iraq...or Afghanistan.

Re: Iraq: Yes, they are there, but they could also be here. It would seem that if we were to limit our options to two, we could say that our choice is either to provide them with better stuff (how long would it take secure contracts, mass produce, ship, train, fit, etc?) or bring them home (which I'm betting we could do quicker than the first option).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
Now the issue is to do whatever we can to support them until they can be pulled out. It would be better to do whatever it takes to get them out of harm's way, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't give them the best protection for the job in the meantime.
If we could snap our fingers and have every service member in this new armor tomorrow (next week, month, 6 months from now) I could see your point, however I don't think such a scenario is realistic.

I'm all for giving them the best protection in the mean time, but again, you seem to be ignoring the fact that we can't even do that with existing, cheaper options.
Achilles is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 02:43 PM   #7
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,912
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
This is the kind of subject for Kavar's, but I don't want to discuss it there.
As long as it doesn't turn into a 'hot topic', and other staff also don't object, this should be fine. Don't be surprised if it takes a turn towards Ahto silliness, however, just so you have fair warning.

I don't know enough about any of these armors to say why one is used vs. another. It could be cost, reliability, comfort in the field, ability to easily mass-produce the items, heat retention issues (important in the desert areas), weight, ability to easily fit males and females, reactions with different chemical agents, and so forth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achilles
I, for one, would prefer we put more money into things that would allow us to avoid putting people in harm's way in the first place.
Definitely agreed on that.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.


Last edited by Jae Onasi; 06-11-2009 at 02:55 PM.
Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 03:12 PM   #8
Salzella
areiK
 
Salzella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,135
Current Game: Portal, Half-Life 2.
Is it made of real dragon skin?
Salzella is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 03:44 PM   #9
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,912
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salzella View Post
Is it made of real dragon skin?
Your choice of green, purple, red, or shiny bad-a** black

@D_Y--weight is a very real issue for soldiers. Their packs already can weigh up to 60 lbs or more, and the guy who carries the M-60 has even more weight to carry beyond that. The last thing you want to do is encumber a soldier with a lot of armor weight. The ability to run from secure point to secure point very quickly is just as important as bullet-resistant armor. There are parts of the body that can't be covered with armor (armpit, back of knee, top of thigh/portions of hip, and so on), and the soldier has to be able to move quickly if he comes under, say, overwhelming fire,


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 04:07 PM   #10
Salzella
areiK
 
Salzella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,135
Current Game: Portal, Half-Life 2.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Onasi View Post
Your choice of green, purple, red, or shiny bad-a** black
hah, clearly a no-brainer
Salzella is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 03:20 PM   #11
Darth_Yuthura
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,585
Current Game: KOTOR III
This isn't about an issue that's yet to happen; this was about a year ago that DS was banned and since then, new contracts for interceptor armour have been awarded. If this had not been shot down by politics over a year ago, the US military could have instead awarded contracts to Pinnacle and not Point Blank for its inferior Interceptor.

Now instead of Dragon Skin, any new vests since it was banned was inferior to what could have been provided for them. The problem I present here is that if DS were superior to Interceptor, then any deaths that happened where DS could have protected them better would be depraved indifference to the lives of US troops.

IF Dragon Skin were banned because it was considered too heavy compared to the lighter Interceptor, then that might be valid enough to restrict its use; but politics has gotten in the way. And now DS armour has a false reputation for being inferior to other vests when even the inventor of Interceptor says its two steps ahead of his own design. That convinced me that was the best, but now the Army has banned it entirely for the wrong reasons.
Darth_Yuthura is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 03:44 PM   #12
Achilles
Dapper Chimp
 
Achilles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,204
Helpful! Veteran Modder Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
This isn't about an issue that's yet to happen; this was about a year ago that DS was banned and since then, new contracts for interceptor armour have been awarded. If this had not been shot down by politics over a year ago, the US military could have instead awarded contracts to Pinnacle and not Point Blank for its inferior Interceptor.
Okay. And how many armed services personnel currently have this armor?

(I notice that we're also assuming that the Interceptor armor actually is inferior).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
Now instead of Dragon Skin, any new vests since it was banned was inferior to what could have been provided for them. The problem I present here is that if DS were superior to Interceptor, then any deaths that happened where DS could have protected them better would be depraved indifference to the lives of US troops.
This seems an awful lot like a non sequitur. "If" (quotin' you) DS is superior to Interceptor, then that has absolutely nothing to do with the current body count, unless you can show that a certain percentage of current casualties were wearing the armor AND that their death(s) could have been prevented had they been wearing DS instead.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
IF Dragon Skin were banned because it was considered too heavy compared to the lighter Interceptor, then that might be valid enough to restrict its use; but politics has gotten in the way.
I'm sorry, I can't just accept this on your say-so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
And now DS armour has a false reputation for being inferior to other vests when even the inventor of Interceptor says its two steps ahead of his own design. That convinced me that was the best, but now the Army has banned it entirely for the wrong reasons.
Same for this. Citations, etc would go a long way toward building your case.
Achilles is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 04:46 PM   #13
Darth_Yuthura
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,585
Current Game: KOTOR III
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achilles View Post
I'm sorry, I can't just accept this on your say-so.

Same for this. Citations, etc would go a long way toward building your case.
Look up a few posts.

Go to youtube, type 'dragon skin,' and watch a few videos. If you don't have the time, then just watch 'The Shocking truth about DS' and this should just about cover it all.

Marine kernal, Jim Mcgee, says DS was way better than his own design of Interceptor. That is a source.

The Army's limited tests that showed how the armor failed are quite difficult to locate. Here are some more sites that have some reading involved:

http://www.defensereview.com/pinnacl...t-at-aberdeen/

http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0607/060707cdam1.htm

http://www.ksee24.com/news/local/9207202.html


The lack of credible sources which verify that DS failed the ballistic tests and how it was blackballed from Army use before even being tested brings to question the actual results of their tests. There is reason to doubt the results of these tests because numerous 3rd parties have done their own and showed it to be vastly superior to the Army's current generation of Interceptor Armour. Many have seen for themselves how it withstood dozens of AK rounds and allowed no penetrations.

Last edited by Darth_Yuthura; 06-11-2009 at 05:46 PM.
Darth_Yuthura is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 03:53 PM   #14
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
The govt has long had a history of going with the lowest/best connected bidder. Remember seeing something on it where they said that though the Army had passed on it that many of the bodyguards for the various generals were using it in Iraq. Frankly, doesn't matter whether the troops are in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Mexico...they should get the best stuff they can. As Rumsfeld said, though, you go to war (wherever that might be) with the army you have. Would just be nice if the govt did it's best to make sure it had what it needed....both at the beginning and all along the "learning curve" of whatever conflict it finds itself in in the end. Still, costs can't be ignored. How expensive is the Dragon Skin if bought in bulk and how quickly can it be manufactured w/o cutting corners? It might just be that such armor is prohibitive in cost for your average line doggie, but that spec operators are a small enough group that the expenses wouldn't bust the budget.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman

Last edited by Totenkopf; 06-11-2009 at 04:29 PM.
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 04:28 PM   #15
CommanderQ
I should go.
 
CommanderQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,630
Current Game: Mass Effect
Forum Veteran Roleplayer Contest winner - Fan Fiction 
I would think Dragon-Skin would be an excellent form of protection for our troops. It's been tested, and has proved itself more then capable in ways of protecting, it can take AK rounds at point-blank, I was pretty dang impressed by that. I really don't know exactly why the Government canceled the project...


you very much
If a tree would fall in the woods.....would the other trees laugh at it?
CommanderQ is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 04:34 PM   #16
Achilles
Dapper Chimp
 
Achilles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,204
Helpful! Veteran Modder Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommanderQ View Post
It's been tested, and has proved itself more then capable in ways of protecting, it can take AK rounds at point-blank, I was pretty dang impressed by that.
To be fair, I've only seen one DS demonstration (and it was several months ago), however I would really need to see this independently verified before I accepted it.

An AK-47 will shoot through lots of things (like houses) from very far away. To stop a bullet at point-blank is truly impressive (if it's true).

Quote:
Originally Posted by CommanderQ View Post
I really don't know exactly why the Government canceled the project...
I'm guessing cost.
Achilles is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 04:51 PM   #17
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommanderQ View Post
...it can take AK rounds at (near) point-blank, I was pretty dang impressed by that.

View page
YouTube Video


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 05:16 PM   #18
Pho3nix
#rekt
 
Pho3nix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,370
Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Totenkopf View Post
View page
YouTube Video
Quote:
Originally Posted by pete108010
how do all u people kno so much stuff about guns and bullets gotta give you all props its pretty amazing u kno like which bullets penetrate more and like alot its crazie

Pho3nix is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 05:00 PM   #19
Darth_Yuthura
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,585
Current Game: KOTOR III
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommanderQ View Post
I really don't know exactly why the Government canceled the project...
They banned it because those who advocated against it had something at stake for killing off Point Blank's competition. Everyone who have 'seen' these tests where the armour failed can't be considered credible because they had something at stake for lying.

Those sites and videos performed by Pinnacle, likewise, would be subject to question. I can conceive the company showing it off on Mail Call and Future Weapons, but there are many 3rd party sources that verify the armour would be rated at level 5 ballistic protection. This is not an official term, but DS would qualify as level 5.
Darth_Yuthura is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 08:46 PM   #20
ForeverNight
nrgurt researcher
 
ForeverNight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 1,204
Current Game: q2
That still doesn't address the point made earlier, Cost-per-unit. What is the difference in cost between this kickass DragonSkin and the Interceptor armor? If this Interceptor can take a few less hits/provide less protection at a unit price that is very much lower as compared to the DS, then I have no problem using Interceptors.

Reason? Infantry aren't the valuable parts of an Army. Sure men go where vehicles can't, but you can throw away squads whereas you can't throw away tanks, APC's and other vehicles. However, I remember reading in article in Machine Design a little while back dealing with DARPA and some mechanized body suits... basically we're going to be developing Powered Battle Armor one of these years....

So, basically, what's the Cost-Per-Unit?

@Jae, I'll take a little bit of every variant.... with double Black of course.


ForeverNight is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-12-2009, 12:07 PM   #21
Darth_Yuthura
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,585
Current Game: KOTOR III
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverNight View Post
That still doesn't address the point made earlier, Cost-per-unit. What is the difference in cost between this kickass DragonSkin and the Interceptor armor? If this Interceptor can take a few less hits/provide less protection at a unit price that is very much lower as compared to the DS, then I have no problem using Interceptors.
Dragon Skin isn't marginally better; it's a leap beyond Interceptor. Where you had four ridged ceramic plates that didn't provide full torso protection, Dragon Skin's flexibility can ensure as much protection around the shoulders as every vital organ.

And in regards to cost, I have seen prices at $5000 last year that could drop to under $1600 per vest if Pinnacle had been awarded a military contract. When you mass produce vests, the price goes down, so it would compare to Interceptor at about $1000. I think they spend more arming US soldiers than armoring them.

If mobility is the concern, then DS would be great for those who man turrets where the soldier is completely exposed to enemy fire.
Darth_Yuthura is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 09:35 PM   #22
ironheart
Rookie
 
ironheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 57
Having spent way too many ridiculously long hot days in my Kevlar, not too fond of the stuff. especially when it's just those big old plates shoved into the IBA vest. (I've heard there's better, more flexible stuff but the guard doesn't see it. Hmph.) But it does do it's job. most of the time. Assuming you don't get shot in the small side area that the IBA doesn't cover. Yeah.

It's a price thing. The Army's cheap. They want it in bulk and they want it affordable. So long as it's moderately functional, phhhaaah, the higher ups don't care. In their view, men are easier and cheaper to replace than equipment.
ironheart is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 10:58 PM   #23
Aash Li
Speak nerdy to me! ;P
 
Aash Li's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Some boring hole in Michigan..
Posts: 1,918
Current Game: LotRO, EQ2 & RoM
Hot Topic Starter 
I wish we could avoid having to send out our loved ones to protect us from the various people that want to kill us too. No one really wants war. No one wants to go and get maimed or killed, or end up blinded.
But unfortunately you can only have true lasting peace if both you and the enemy want it. If you go over "there" (being a general term, not just the mid-east) and claim that were not at war, we dont have anyfight with them. Then were just going to get bombed or have more innocents murdered by hijacked planes...

And Ironheart, its not the military thats cheap, its Congress. They hold the financial purse-strings of the military in general.

My comment seems off topic, but I was just responding to other bits of conversation I didnt quote. Sorry... and since I dont have any feedback on the armour issue, Ill leave with this:

I want what ever sort of armour that will help keep our soldiers alive. We fund the military to keep ourselves safe. We cant spend our taxpayers money on "green" nonsense or education or whatever if we are just a smoking crater...
Aash Li is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-11-2009, 11:43 PM   #24
swphreak
My cabbages!!!
 
swphreak's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,510
10 year veteran! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
<- not an expert

The Interceptor thingy is modular and can swap out plates and stuff right? It doesn't look like Dragon Skin can be switched out. Instead of replacing a damaged DS vest, a soldier can just replace their damaged plate in the Interceptor one. I bet that was a factor in the Army's decision to drop Dragon Skin.

Though my money is on that Interceptor body armor is cheaper.
swphreak is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-12-2009, 09:22 AM   #25
Rogue15
Reconnaissance Specialist
 
Rogue15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 18,561
Current Game: The Old Republic
Roleplayer 10 year veteran! 
from what i read at goarmy.com it doesn't hold up so well in the desert.


Battle is a pure form of expression. It is heart and discipline, reduced to movement and motion. In battle, the words are swept away, giving way to actions-- mercy, sacrifice, anger, fear. These are pure moments of expression.
Rogue15 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-12-2009, 11:41 AM   #26
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Yeah, I've read that prolonged exposure to heat will make the ceramic layers that make up the "scales" separate because whatever substance is used to bond them together breaks down.

As has been pointed out above, Dragon Scales is not modular and costs roughly twice as much as Interceptor. And as Jae indicated, hauling 35 pounds around is not practical and can be more of a liability than an asset in a combat situation. New materials will have to be invented before the weight issue can be properly addressed, though.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-12-2009, 03:02 PM   #27
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,912
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
So, it currently costs 5 times more than the interceptor, weighs more, has had a history of not holding up under field conditions, isn't reparable with the same ease as interceptor, and looks like it takes longer to make.

I don't care how good it is at stopping bullets in the lab. If it fails in the field and can't be repaired easily, you may as well put these soldiers in no armor at all. It's a $5k useless pile of crap if it falls apart in the middle of battle, and it leaves the soldier at far greater risk than if he'd been given the interceptor armor. Now I understand why they weren't awarded the contract, and agree that this was an appropriate decision.

If the makers of DS can fix the problems with failure in the field and address the repair issues, then they might have a viable product worthy of consideration.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-12-2009, 04:17 PM   #28
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
I'd agree that if the price can be brought down to less than 2x the cost of the other product and that any remaining performance issues are resolved, that DS would be a worthy addition to ballistic protection, even if it's use is limited to certain types of units. As I recall, even in 'Nam, the heat often resulted in many troopers not always using their vests. When you consider that many of these soldiers are moving around w/ gear that weighs as much as a small child in 110+ degree heat, the weight issue is not insignificant. What problems dose the DS have in temperate or cold climates? Perhaps it might prove more useful in Korea and other more temperate environments.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-12-2009, 04:36 PM   #29
ironheart
Rookie
 
ironheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Totenkopf View Post
I'd agree that if the price can be brought down to less than 2x the cost of the other product and that any remaining performance issues are resolved, that DS would be a worthy addition to ballistic protection, even if it's use is limited to certain types of units. As I recall, even in 'Nam, the heat often resulted in many troopers not always using their vests. When you consider that many of these soldiers are moving around w/ gear that weighs as much as a small child in 110+ degree heat, the weight issue is not insignificant. What problems dose the DS have in temperate or cold climates? Perhaps it might prove more useful in Korea and other more temperate environments.
The lightest ruck I've ever seen was 50 pounds. Usually they're more than that. So yeah, weight is a factor. And if it can't hold up to the heat, it's pretty much useless for the soldiers running around out there in Iraq. There's not enough action going on in places like Korea to justify getting special armor just for them. I've heard from my buddies that depending on where you are over their the hardest job you have is baby sitting the border. Which incidentally , hehe, is why it's where most of the privates want to get stationed. Lots of, ah, "night life".
ironheart is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-12-2009, 11:15 PM   #30
CommanderQ
I should go.
 
CommanderQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,630
Current Game: Mass Effect
Forum Veteran Roleplayer Contest winner - Fan Fiction 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ironheart View Post
The lightest ruck I've ever seen was 50 pounds. Usually they're more than that. So yeah, weight is a factor. And if it can't hold up to the heat, it's pretty much useless for the soldiers running around out there in Iraq. There's not enough action going on in places like Korea to justify getting special armor just for them. I've heard from my buddies that depending on where you are over their the hardest job you have is baby sitting the border. Which incidentally , hehe, is why it's where most of the privates want to get stationed. Lots of, ah, "night life".
I wouldn't exactly say that there isn't enough going on in places like Korea....recent events have been pretty tense, especially with the Nuclear Tests, and Kim Jong-Il declaring that NK no longer acknowledged the Peace Treaty that ended the major part of the Korean war.

If war should erupt against North Korea, our troops would need everything we can give them, US forces would be greatly outnumbered {having only a some ought 25,000 to the entire army of North Korea, which is pretty big} , technology would be one of our few advantages, if not one of the only ones.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Onasi View Post
Well, a good friend of mine almost got knifed to death in the DMZ by a North Korean, so the 'night life' he saw wasn't the warm cozy kind.
Weren't there a few other events similar that happened in the past 20 years or so? I heard about a few border skirmishes and knifings...


you very much
If a tree would fall in the woods.....would the other trees laugh at it?
CommanderQ is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-12-2009, 11:09 PM   #31
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,912
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
Well, a good friend of mine almost got knifed to death in the DMZ by a North Korean, so the 'night life' he saw wasn't the warm cozy kind.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-12-2009, 11:52 PM   #32
JediAthos
Senior Member
 
JediAthos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,438
Current Game: Defiance
Forum Veteran Contest winner - Fan Fiction 
One of the common sayings in the military is: "Remember, your weapon was made by the lowest bidder."

That aside, this link is from the ArmyTimes website. I found it with a quick google search.

http://www.militarytimes.com/static/...00121may07.pdf


"You'll find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view."

JediAthos is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-12-2009, 11:57 PM   #33
EnderWiggin
Sine Amore Nihil Est Vita
 
EnderWiggin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,395
Forum Veteran LF Jester 
View page
YouTube Video

_EW_



Hello, Pot? This is Kettle. You're black. ~ Prime

Yes, I hate you.

J7 - thanks for accepting me as part of the 'family.'
EnderWiggin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-13-2009, 12:04 AM   #34
Darth_Yuthura
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,585
Current Game: KOTOR III
^^^

What does that have to do with anything?

DS is the best of the best, but the only technical issues are heat tolerance and weight. Beyond that, it's perfect.

And the Army banned it for political, not technical reasons. I don't know about you, but I would want the ones responsible for the ban to face the consequences for what they've done.
Darth_Yuthura is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-13-2009, 12:10 AM   #35
EnderWiggin
Sine Amore Nihil Est Vita
 
EnderWiggin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,395
Forum Veteran LF Jester 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
What does that have to do with anything?
I'll explain it to you when you're older.

_EW_



Hello, Pot? This is Kettle. You're black. ~ Prime

Yes, I hate you.

J7 - thanks for accepting me as part of the 'family.'
EnderWiggin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-13-2009, 12:27 AM   #36
Achilles
Dapper Chimp
 
Achilles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,204
Helpful! Veteran Modder Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
DS is the best of the best, but the only technical issues are heat tolerance and weight. Beyond that, it's perfect.
Could you please provide us with your expert qualifications? I don't believe that one need be an expert to speak intelligently on a subject, but since you insist that we accept your opinion as though you were an authority on the subject, I really must insist.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
And the Army banned it for political, not technical reasons.
This is opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
I don't know about you, but I would want the ones responsible for the ban to face the consequences for what they've done.
Were you think tea and cake or death?
Achilles is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-13-2009, 01:52 AM   #37
Tommycat
>^..^<
 
Tommycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,577
Current Game: Real Life 1.0(BETA)
Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
^^^

What does that have to do with anything?

DS is the best of the best, but the only technical issues are heat tolerance and weight. Beyond that, it's perfect.

And the Army banned it for political, not technical reasons. I don't know about you, but I would want the ones responsible for the ban to face the consequences for what they've done.
Wait, You have proof that the army banned it for political and not technical reasons?

35 lbs doesn't sound like much when you are ONLY carrying that 35 lbs. Carry a full pack, an M60, and ammo. 120+ extra lbs starts to make you tire out rather quickly. Many troops would just not wear the armor.

Cost: 5,000,000 for 1000 units. THAT'S A LOT. Cutting it down to 1,000,000 per 1000 is a savings of 4 million per 1000 units.

Reliability: The military doesn't like things that break down on them. If it breaks down in hot weather, that would be a bad thing. Our military operates in a variety of climates. Hot climates are one of them.

Army test results (Please note 2006 date)
excerpt:
Quote:
Pinnacle SOV 3000 level IV Dragon Skin suffered catastrophic failure of
the ceramic disc containment grid adhesive at -60º F, 120º F and 160º F.
• SOV 3000 design is sensitive to extreme temperatures and failed to
maintain ballistic integrity at temperatures below summer ambient in OIF.
This failure mode caused discs to delaminate and accumulate in the lower
portion of the armor panel, thus resulting in exposing the spine, vital
organs, and critical blood vessels to lesser ballistic threats.


Pinnacle SOV 3000 level IV Dragon Skin vests suffered 13 first or second
shot complete penetrations, failing 4 of 8 initial subtests with ESAPI
threat baseline 7.62 x 63mm APM2 Armor Piercing (AP) ammunition
.
I think the US Army had some PRETTY DANG GOOD reasons not to keep Dragon Skin


"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by Tommycat; 06-13-2009 at 02:01 AM.
Tommycat is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-13-2009, 08:54 AM   #38
Darth_Yuthura
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,585
Current Game: KOTOR III
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommycat View Post
Wait, You have proof that the army banned it for political and not technical reasons?

Cost: 5,000,000 for 1000 units. THAT'S A LOT. Cutting it down to 1,000,000 per 1000 is a savings of 4 million per 1000 units.
Here's some proof right there that the Army will sacrifice the safety of its troops to save money.
Darth_Yuthura is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-13-2009, 03:47 PM   #39
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,912
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Yuthura View Post
Here's some proof right there that the Army will sacrifice the safety of its troops to save money.
Tommycat's second part of his post quotes a source saying the thing falls apart when the temprature hits 120 degrees. There's proof right there that they weren't willing to sacrifice troop safety on something that doesn't work. It gets up to and over 120 degrees in the summer in Iraq and other deserts. As the wife of a soldier who is on active duty and could end up in Iraq any time the Army wanted, I'm very glad that some general looked at the reliability data and decided that it would not be intelligent to buy something that would have a critical and potentially life-threatening failure in conditions that we fight in on a regular basis right now. So the scales fall down in the bottom of the vest at 120 degrees? Great. We'll have excellent beltline protection from bullets while other little things like the heart, lungs, liver, and spleen are without any protection except cloth.

It would be a completely irresponsible use of our money and soldiers to put them in substandard armor. It is not perfect, as DY claims, if it falls apart in the middle of battle on a hot summer day. If they solve the delamination problem, then it can be re-assessed, but we shouldn't buy and use the DS armor before the problem is fixed.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-13-2009, 04:44 PM   #40
Darth_Yuthura
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,585
Current Game: KOTOR III
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Onasi View Post
Tommycat's second part of his post quotes a source saying the thing falls apart when the temprature hits 120 degrees. There's proof right there that they weren't willing to sacrifice troop safety on something that doesn't work.
So they did give Dragon Skin to all the armed forces? I remember that it was banned before it was even confirmed that it was prone to failure in hot conditions. Third party sources had tested the vests and brought serious question to the Army's tests, even under optimal conditions. If the Army manipulated tests under optimal conditions, then how can we be sure they didn't alter DS under unfavorable conditions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Onasi View Post
So the scales fall down in the bottom of the vest at 120 degrees? Great. We'll have excellent beltline protection from bullets while other little things like the heart, lungs, liver, and spleen are without any protection except cloth.
Yeah, while those wearing Interceptor will always leave some of their vital organs exposed under any circumstances. Yeah, DS fails in extreme heat, but it's not like it completely breaks down... did you notice that virtually all those penetrations of which the Army claims landed only on the areas where a disc was missing? Of course, if you know where to fire, then that might make it easier to penetrate the vest. If you aimed only at where the Interceptor plates don't cover the torso, it would fail every time.

If you have a gap in the mesh that exposes the heart, there is still a LOT of the vest that still works properly. Notice in the X-rays that the test shots were made at the locations where the discs left the body exposed? I don't believe our enemies had X-ray vision to know where to shoot. If you fired at it with an Ak, I wouldn't put it past there being a few hits at the exposed areas, but the majority of the shots would still have been stopped in the areas that hadn't been compromised. Pepper an Interceptor vest and the same thing would happen. Fire at an uncompromised DS vest, and it would outperform Interceptor in every way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Onasi View Post
It would be a completely irresponsible use of our money and soldiers to put them in substandard armor.
Then why are there instances when the Army does equip special forces with this substandard vest? Why would they classify so much about their tests if DS doesn't stand a chance against Interceptor? Why would they distort statistics and deliberately modify statements of witnesses to something completely different than they recalled? How could so many third-party sources come to such different conclusions about the same tests?

I would assume there's more to this than the Army wants to admit. I call it irresponsible and depraved indifference to human life if they have distorted tests in order to keep a contract with Point-blank for an inferior product. Pinnacle has come up with a brilliant design in body armour and if they haven't been given a fair trial, then that's not irresponsible; that's a criminal act against life.

Last edited by Darth_Yuthura; 06-13-2009 at 05:16 PM.
Darth_Yuthura is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > Knights of the Old Republic > Community > Kavar's Corner > Dragon Skin in the Military

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 AM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.