|
|
 |
01-17-2004, 10:09 PM
|
#1
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 118
|
One question...
Is this game going to be Single-player or Multi-player? This may seem to be a dumb question, but I haven't seen it referenced to anywhere, so please don't make funno me. Thx.
I am master of Tokyo.
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-17-2004, 10:38 PM
|
#3
|
|
vs. The World.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: on a highway to hell
Posts: 1,319
Current Game: On the top of it.
|
but if you have a slow internet connection, you can always play against bots.
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-18-2004, 07:30 AM
|
#4
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 898
|
Here's hoping that the Single Player will be better than that of BF1942. The sheer dumbness of the bots is depressing, leaving it almost an MP only game.
So if the bots are as dumb as BF1942's, then it'll be MP only (for me, that is).
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-18-2004, 05:07 PM
|
#5
|
|
A peppermint nightmare.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 4,132
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Excelsion
Here's hoping that the Single Player will be better than that of BF1942. The sheer dumbness of the bots is depressing, leaving it almost an MP only game.
So if the bots are as dumb as BF1942's, then it'll be MP only (for me, that is).
|
Same her...
Damn you BF 1942 bots, you win this time!  (or not  )
Just have to convince my dad to upgrade our internet connection, since we have 4 PCs sharing 512 kb/sec... Probably never gonna happen though... 
Pondering the mystery of rainbows, UFOs, and ****ing magnets.
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-18-2004, 05:35 PM
|
#6
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 898
|
Ouch! I have four PC's sharing 1Mbps. BF1942 works fine for me.
I reckon that the Single Player for SWBF will be much better than BF1942. We'll just have to see if it can beat BF: Vietnam.
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-18-2004, 05:49 PM
|
#7
|
|
Retro KFC
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Mercer Island,WA
Posts: 1,341
|
I cant wait for the MP, its supposed to be awesome. Im not sure if there is a single player though. Could be, i wouldnt be suprised.
And lets just hope the it doesnt have the same loading time as BF:1942. It would ruin the game.
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-18-2004, 05:57 PM
|
#8
|
|
Not the brightest cookie.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom, Abingdon
Posts: 4,550
|
Lets just Single-Player isn't like Battlefield 1942's cannon fodder single player bots. They ruined my liking for that game after I saw them in action, I felt like I was fighting an ugnaught in Jedi Academy.
Oh well lets just hope that Battlefront can improve on Battlefields weaknesses.
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-18-2004, 06:01 PM
|
#9
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 898
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Father Torque
And lets just hope the it doesnt have the same loading time as BF:1942. It would ruin the game.
|
I recently upgraded to 1 Gig of RAM. BF1942 runs (and loads) incredibly fast.
Quote:
|
Oh well lets just hope that Battlefront can improve on Battlefields weaknesses.
|
Battlefront's going to have to improve on any weaknesses that Battlefield Vietnam has (if any).
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-18-2004, 06:04 PM
|
#10
|
|
Not the brightest cookie.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom, Abingdon
Posts: 4,550
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Excelsion
I recently upgraded to 1 Gig of RAM. BF1942 runs (and loads) incredibly fast.
Battlefront's going to have to improve on any weaknesses that Battlefield Vietnam has (if any).
|
If it doesen't improve on those weaknesses then Battlefront will be over before it began. But we can't give up hope, Lucasarts will come through for us. :P
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-18-2004, 06:04 PM
|
#11
|
|
Octavarium
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 10,915
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Father Torque
I cant wait for the MP, its supposed to be awesome. Im not sure if there is a single player though. Could be, i wouldnt be suprised.
And lets just hope the it doesnt have the same loading time as BF:1942. It would ruin the game.
|
It'll be both SP and MP. 
Last.FM - Ow, give up the funk
Let the truth of love be lighted
Let the love of truth shine clear
Sensibility
Armed with sense and liberty
With the heart and mind united
In a single perfect sphere
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-19-2004, 07:03 PM
|
#12
|
|
In hiding
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 3,880
|
Even if the bots in BF 1942 would be smarter etc than humans in MP I still wouldn't consider it SP but just a MP server with bots.. I hope the SP will have some different levels, and especially things like 'meet luke skywalker here' to give it a SP feeling
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
01-19-2004, 07:42 PM
|
#13
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 898
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Alegis Gensan
Even if the bots in BF 1942 would be smarter etc than humans in MP I still wouldn't consider it SP but just a MP server with bots.. I hope the SP will have some different levels, and especially things like 'meet luke skywalker here' to give it a SP feeling
|
Yeah,that would be good. They've already added stuff that makes SP differ from MP, which is also good. Perhaps if you were Imperial you could meet Darth Vader instead.
|
|
you may:
quote & reply,
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Forum Jump
|
|
|
|
|
|