lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar

Thread: (The) Intel Strikes Back? (smugly as usual too!)
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 09-19-2007, 11:11 AM   #1
Negative Sun
Death to all but metal!
 
Negative Sun's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tropical Scotland
Posts: 2,683
Current Game: NWN
Forum Veteran Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Helpful! 
(The) Intel Strikes Back? (smugly as usual too!)

A couple of things came up at the Intel Developer Forum recently:

Intel dismisses AMD's triple core threat
^ This guy cracks me up *unimpressed look*

Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (45nm) announced
^ Who's gonna want to buy that when you can O/C some of the lower and much cheaper ones to insane levels anyways?

Dual CPU Quad SLI motherboard revealed
^ Not exactly mainstream, but it certainly makes you drool (and want to buy a nuclear power plant!)

5.56GHz Penryn breaks three benchmark records in two minutes
^ That is quite cool in many ways!

Intel to make high-end GPUs
^ More competition can only mean less spendage



"I killed a man cause he killed my goat."
Negative Sun is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 09-20-2007, 05:11 AM   #2
Astrotoy7
A Face from The Past
 
Astrotoy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,284
Notable contributor Helpful! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member 
damnit AMD, I wish they could roll out their high end k10 45nm NOW ..... I want a benchie showdown !



What's the best is that I know about a dozen Lan tourney gamers who BRAG and BRAG about their QX6850..... theyre going to be do depressed that their uber chip has already been superceded... off to ebay boys !!

mtfbwya


Asinus asinum fricat
Astrotoy7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 09-20-2007, 08:08 AM   #3
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
^^^You should tell them that spending ~$1200.00 on performance that they could have gotten for approximately a quarter of the price by buying and overclocking a Q6600 is nothing to brag about.

Q6600s are selling for $270.00. Bump the FSB up from 1066MHZ to 1333MHZ and what do you have? A QX6850.

Anyone who buys a QX6850 is clearly missing the point as to what makes C2Q so great.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 09-20-2007, 09:46 AM   #4
Negative Sun
Death to all but metal!
 
Negative Sun's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tropical Scotland
Posts: 2,683
Current Game: NWN
Forum Veteran Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qliveur
Anyone who buys a QX6850 is clearly...
a m*r*n

^ Would you like to buy a vowel?



"I killed a man cause he killed my goat."
Negative Sun is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 09-20-2007, 07:01 PM   #5
Darth333
Administraterror
 
Darth333's Avatar
 
Status: Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In my secret dungeon...
Posts: 8,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qliveur
^^^You should tell them that spending ~$1200.00 on performance that they could have gotten for approximately a quarter of the price by buying and overclocking a Q6600 is nothing to brag about.

Q6600s are selling for $270.00. Bump the FSB up from 1066MHZ to 1333MHZ and what do you have? A QX6850.

Anyone who buys a QX6850 is clearly missing the point as to what makes C2Q so great.
Indeed! I don't quite see the point in buying a QX6850...

Also not only you pay 5x the price of a Q6000 but the CPU will be outdated as fast as the Q6600. I prefer to buy cheaper, get almost the same performance and replace more often (without too much guilt) : it's cheaper and offers a better overall performance in the long run.

And the 32nm chip is coming less than two years: http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archi...0918corp_a.htm
Darth333 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 09-20-2007, 11:15 PM   #6
Char Ell
Force Enlightened
 
Char Ell's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,368
Current Game: The Old Republic
LFN Staff Member Folder extraordinaire Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Negative Sun
Intel to make high-end GPUs
^ More competition can only mean less spendage
So Intel has at long last officially confirmed they will be entering the discrete graphics market. 'Twill be interesting to see how they do in the gaming graphics segment as this introduces a 3rd GPU that game devs would need to support. Not sure how that will work out.


Want to battle against cancer and other chronic diseases? Join Team LFN!


Char Ell is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 09-21-2007, 05:38 AM   #7
Negative Sun
Death to all but metal!
 
Negative Sun's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tropical Scotland
Posts: 2,683
Current Game: NWN
Forum Veteran Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Char Ell
So Intel has at long last officially confirmed they will be entering the discrete graphics market. 'Twill be interesting to see how they do in the gaming graphics segment as this introduces a 3rd GPU that game devs would need to support. Not sure how that will work out.
It would probably take more effort from Intel (me thinks they'll jump on the DX10.1+ bandwagon then) to release the necessary drivers and make sure they release them with full DX and OpenGL support...I don't think the devs should worry too much about it.



"I killed a man cause he killed my goat."
Negative Sun is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 09-21-2007, 07:41 AM   #8
Astrotoy7
A Face from The Past
 
Astrotoy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,284
Notable contributor Helpful! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth333
Indeed! I don't quite see the point in buying a QX6850...

Also not only you pay 5x the price [/url]
D333, power pc builders and owners are the tech equivalent to revheads(our word for an exuberant motoring enthusiast). ie. price is immaterial, and quite often functionality too Most of it is about showing off

These differ from "roll up your sleeves and pass me that coolant" overclockers, who will want to show off a 1337 clockspeed on an older/standard CPU.

@Q >> having helped build a few of those, I can tell you that not one of them payed anywhere near full price for one. But any further question you may not ask, especially when 'the law' is around *winks at D333*

I was offered one, but declined due to my thorough dislike of Intel, especially after recently reading they axed 5000 managerial staff..... taking total lay-offs to nearly 11,000 over the last 3 years(their target being 15,000 by circa 2009)

Doesnt that want to make you race off an buy an Intel product ?? Not me.

mtfbwya


Asinus asinum fricat
Astrotoy7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 09-21-2007, 07:01 PM   #9
Negative Sun
Death to all but metal!
 
Negative Sun's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tropical Scotland
Posts: 2,683
Current Game: NWN
Forum Veteran Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Helpful! 
Yet another reason to dislike Intel and root for AMD...You sure you're not on the latter's payroll Astro?



"I killed a man cause he killed my goat."
Negative Sun is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 09-22-2007, 08:58 AM   #10
Astrotoy7
A Face from The Past
 
Astrotoy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,284
Notable contributor Helpful! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Negative Sun
Yet another reason to dislike Intel and root for AMD...You sure you're not on the latter's payroll Astro?
lolz.... I like the fact that an international juggernaut like Intel has a gutsy competitor...who've got to where they are by hard work, and with enough business sense to achieve all that with a fraction of Intel's infrastructure.

But a company that likes to slice 15,000 jobs to make a prettier show at wall street doesnt deserve any support, IMO.

astro


Asinus asinum fricat
Astrotoy7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 09-22-2007, 09:33 AM   #11
Negative Sun
Death to all but metal!
 
Negative Sun's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tropical Scotland
Posts: 2,683
Current Game: NWN
Forum Veteran Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Helpful! 
Amen to that...



"I killed a man cause he killed my goat."
Negative Sun is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > Community Discussion > General LFNetwork Forums > General Tech Discussion > (The) Intel Strikes Back? (smugly as usual too!)

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 PM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.