lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar
View Poll Results: Would you like to build the Deathstar in EaW?
Yes 21 50.00%
No 7 16.67%
Need more game info first 14 33.33%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll


Thread: Wanna build the Deathstar? Whats your views?
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 02-18-2005, 01:28 AM   #1
DarthMaulUK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wanna build the Deathstar? Whats your views?

POLL OF THE WEEK
18-02-05

For those who haven't played Supremacy/Rebellion, it was set just after the destruction of the first Deathstar, with the galaxy in total turmoil.

However, playing as the Empire, once you've gathered enough mining resources, you were able to build a Deathstar. Superb to have in battle, and yes, rebel fighters could launch an attack on it - it certainly spread fear across the galaxy.

But if you destroyed a planet, support for you would fall sharply. Do you think we should be able to build a Deathstar in the new RTS: Empire At War?

DMUK
  you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-18-2005, 02:47 AM   #2
Jan Gaarni
Grand Moff
 
Jan Gaarni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,806
LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
I don't know if we could really fit a Death Star in the game.

I mean, as cool as it was in Rebellion, there were 200 planets in that game to reck havoc with, while Empire at War is reported to have somewhere around 10% of that (20 planets).

Also, I'm not totally sure how free we are to make history in this game, if it's as free as in Rebellion (which was very free ).

So:
Need more game info first




Empire At War Moderator
&
SWGalaxies Moderator

- What we do in life, echoes in eternity!
- May the pants be with you!

A smile is the shortest distance between people - Victor Borge!


Custom Avatar by Wraith 8
Jan Gaarni is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-18-2005, 03:41 AM   #3
lonepadawan
 
lonepadawan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 363
Well they mentioned attacking the deathstar itself in the initial preview. And theres a picture of it in the gameart on the Lucasarts mini-site... so who knows..


"Your life does flash before your eyes before you die..... the process is called LIVING"
lonepadawan is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-19-2005, 11:02 AM   #4
Darth Alec
Forumite
 
Darth Alec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Searching for the Death Star blueprints....
Posts: 591
If there were atleast 35+ planet's then it could destroy planet's but if not then it could be complete dominating in space battles but weak against X-Wings. But it would be mass money to make it.......


I am a High Admiral of the Imperial fleet.

Serving the Empire is my destiny, and only Sidious is my lord.

Two starwars parodys...

Starwars gangsta rap

Robot chicken
Darth Alec is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-19-2005, 12:48 PM   #5
Master_Cain
Rookie
 
Master_Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 89
I'm 100% sure that the DS will be in. You will probably have the posibility to build only one per Galaxy at one time.

Remouved - Edit


Last edited by Master_Cain; 03-09-2005 at 02:20 AM.
Master_Cain is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-20-2005, 12:28 AM   #6
Jan Gaarni
Grand Moff
 
Jan Gaarni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,806
LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
Here's to hoping they will make it as grand as Rebellion in size, only with better grafics and features.




Empire At War Moderator
&
SWGalaxies Moderator

- What we do in life, echoes in eternity!
- May the pants be with you!

A smile is the shortest distance between people - Victor Borge!


Custom Avatar by Wraith 8
Jan Gaarni is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-20-2005, 02:47 AM   #7
Master_Cain
Rookie
 
Master_Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 89
Edit - Removed


Last edited by Master_Cain; 03-09-2005 at 02:22 AM.
Master_Cain is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-04-2005, 07:47 PM   #8
jokemaster
The master of jokes
 
jokemaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,748
Roleplayer 
I say it depends on how it could be handled. Maybe singleplayer only?


Vader's wife was very pregnant when she died 19 years ago. All of a sudden a 19 year old who is very strong in the force and has a distinct resembalance to him in his younger days rolls in from Vader's home planet with his old Master Obi-Wan (Who was the ONLY other person preset at the time his wife died. And to boot, the kid's last name is Skywalker.

So in answer to your question, he knew Luke was his son because his name is Darth Vader, and not Darth Retard.


-Forum post on why Vader knew Luke was his son.
jokemaster is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-05-2005, 05:37 AM   #9
Heavyarms
The Buckeye Maneater!!!
 
Heavyarms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: America, the Land of the Free, and the Home of the Brave!
Posts: 2,473
If you do it, you need it to be built REAL slow, and it can not force itself into hyperspace like the other ships. And the primary weapon must recharge for something like 5 minutes, with a timer showed to the other players so they can see how much time until it can fire. Any capital ship that gets close should be destroyed, but you can build the first one or the second one, with the second one much larger and takes a lot longer to build.


Proud to be an American.

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."-Edmund Burke
Heavyarms is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-08-2005, 07:11 PM   #10
Dagobahn Eagle
First Strike Tester
 
Dagobahn Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 3,513
Current Game: First Strike
It sounds to me like the Balrog in Battle for Middle Earth: It only stays for about a minute or so, but it flies, it can take a lot of damage, and it has a special attack which it can use freely(albeit only once), that levels everything within a pretty large radius.

So you can spend a good deal of time building a base and whoosh - every tenth minute from then on, your "command tower" and your walls - which cannot be repaired, as far as I know - along with half your base and most people inside, are dead.

Not a good idea. Middle Earth is an "everything is expendable" game where troops and units can be re-built in seconds, but it's still so dang annoying.

Top that off with the way the game only lets you build on specific spots, which, in the case of your home town, are very close together... (not a bad idea in itself, but very much so in the case of the Balrog).

My personal stance: I don't want to have nurtured a planet, its people, its army, and its defences for a whole game to have it destroyed in an instant by a battle station, nuclear bomb, or demon from Hell, or whatever else. In my opinion, there's no fun in that whatsoever, no matter how expensive the Death Star, B-29, or demon is in terms of research, production cost and time, and population/command points/upkeep/maintenance.

As for a Death Star battle (handled as an infantry and ground vehicle-free ground battle using the DS surface instead of a planet): Many of those were made for SWGB, and they all proved that such a battle is no fun for an RTS, I believe. It ruled in Galactic Conquest, but for an RTS... I don't think so.

So the only way to do it would be to make the Death Star a huge ship with a ton of hit points and weapons, or to have its destruction be automatic if you send a lot of fighters at it (as a mission outside of battle or something) and I don't want either of those ideas either.

And what would the rebels have to counter it? In Battlefront there was "Rebel Uprising", which gave you the whole planet. This, too, I'm against for the reason I provided above (see "my stance").

No offense to the Death Star supporters, but I do not like the idea.

Dagobahn Eagle is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2005, 10:28 AM   #11
Sabretooth
鬼龍院皐月
 
Sabretooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 9,364
Excuse me being so naive, but when was this "Rebellion" released?


Sabretooth is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2005, 10:51 AM   #12
Dagobahn Eagle
First Strike Tester
 
Dagobahn Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 3,513
Current Game: First Strike
Ages ago.

Dagobahn Eagle is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2005, 04:38 PM   #13
Jan Gaarni
Grand Moff
 
Jan Gaarni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,806
LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally posted by Sabretooth
Excuse me being so naive, but when was this "Rebellion" released?
If you're from the UK, I believe it was called Star Wars Supremacy there.

Don't ask me why.




Empire At War Moderator
&
SWGalaxies Moderator

- What we do in life, echoes in eternity!
- May the pants be with you!

A smile is the shortest distance between people - Victor Borge!


Custom Avatar by Wraith 8
Jan Gaarni is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2005, 10:55 PM   #14
FroZticles
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 774
Nah maybe in campaigns in singe player just to add to the story but not in multiplayer so you can just nuke your enemy in seconds.


Age of Empires 3
vs
Empire at War
vs
Rise of Legends
vs
Battle for Middle-Earth 2

Let the battle begin.....




FroZticles is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2005, 10:57 PM   #15
jokemaster
The master of jokes
 
jokemaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,748
Roleplayer 
Quote:
Originally posted by FroZticles
Nah maybe in campaigns in singe player just to add to the story but not in multiplayer so you can just nuke your enemy in seconds.
HEY! SOMEONE AGREES WITH ME!!
*Pours Fro a drink*


Vader's wife was very pregnant when she died 19 years ago. All of a sudden a 19 year old who is very strong in the force and has a distinct resembalance to him in his younger days rolls in from Vader's home planet with his old Master Obi-Wan (Who was the ONLY other person preset at the time his wife died. And to boot, the kid's last name is Skywalker.

So in answer to your question, he knew Luke was his son because his name is Darth Vader, and not Darth Retard.


-Forum post on why Vader knew Luke was his son.
jokemaster is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2005, 12:37 AM   #16
Master_Cain
Rookie
 
Master_Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally posted by Sabretooth
Excuse me being so naive, but when was this "Rebellion" released?

1998

Master_Cain is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2005, 08:54 AM   #17
Dagobahn Eagle
First Strike Tester
 
Dagobahn Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 3,513
Current Game: First Strike
Dang:
Quote:
Rather than relying on scripted missions and story points, the developers have decided to let the story develop dynamically. There are no missions here; players will simply fight from planet to planet in a freeform galaxy. The persistence of units and bases will give a sense of continuity to the whole affair. So while the game doesn't feature a Death Star attack on Yavin or the Rebel's fighting retreat from Hoth, those scenarios can come up as a result of how you and your opponent are playing the game.
Sounds like there'll be a Death Star to me.

No forced "gameplay", though. That's one of the things I liked the most about Galactic Conquest.

Quote:
Nah maybe in campaigns in singe player just to add to the story but not in multiplayer so you can just nuke your enemy in seconds.
Something we agree on, finally.

Want a glass of Coca-Cola with ice, Frozt? Finish that first drink first, though.

Dagobahn Eagle is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-12-2005, 11:54 AM   #18
lonepadawan
 
lonepadawan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 363
Quote:
Nah maybe in campaigns in singe player just to add to the story but not in multiplayer so you can just nuke your enemy in seconds.
Well obviously not in single battle matches. But they've hinted at being able to play multiplayer campaigns. In which case the death star should be perfectly feasable.

-It'd be hugeley expensive and take a long time to build
-would be vunerable without a planetary shield
-Capturing a planet is always better than simply destroying it.


"Your life does flash before your eyes before you die..... the process is called LIVING"
lonepadawan is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-12-2005, 12:07 PM   #19
Darth Alec
Forumite
 
Darth Alec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Searching for the Death Star blueprints....
Posts: 591
how bout destroying it while it's being constucted, unlike the second Deathstar this one probebly woulden't have a gun until complition, and finding it isent a problem either since rebels have a spy network in the game. Think, all those wasted resources on one station and you didn't even get to try it.


I am a High Admiral of the Imperial fleet.

Serving the Empire is my destiny, and only Sidious is my lord.

Two starwars parodys...

Starwars gangsta rap

Robot chicken
Darth Alec is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-12-2005, 04:52 PM   #20
Dagobahn Eagle
First Strike Tester
 
Dagobahn Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 3,513
Current Game: First Strike
Quote:
-It'd be hugeley expensive and take a long time to build
-would be vunerable without a planetary shield
Even so, it'd be perfectly buildable. The Atomic bombers, V-2 cruise missiles, and Wonders in Empires: Dawn of the Modern World, are also hugely expensive, take a long time to build, and are vulnerable. Still, they get built.

Quote:
-Capturing a planet is always better than simply destroying it.
Not always. If you can't for the life of you take a planet, blow it up. Once in Battlefront, by the way, I was playing as the Empire and I had two planets left to capture. I had initiative and 3 out of 4 victory points. I captured one planet and used the 4 Victory points to build the Death Star - with which I blew up the last enemy planet.

Resource-wise, it's better to capture planets, of course. But there are other reasons to conduct conquest than resources. If you have the choice between wiping out a major enemy stronghold with no casualties taken, and capturing it and taking casualties, sometimes it's better to wipe it out. Especially if you have all the resources you need.

Dagobahn Eagle is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-12-2005, 09:08 PM   #21
FroZticles
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 774
Sorry I don't drink coke since I got highly addicted and had to stop drinking it :P

Nice point about destroying instead of capture. I'm sure the US could have just nuked Iraq instead of going in and wiping out terror strongholds but it brings up to many ethical questions.


Age of Empires 3
vs
Empire at War
vs
Rise of Legends
vs
Battle for Middle-Earth 2

Let the battle begin.....




FroZticles is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-27-2005, 11:40 AM   #22
General Nitro
Junior Member
 
General Nitro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Korriban
Posts: 300
No. The Deathstar is too big.
General Nitro is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-31-2005, 10:59 PM   #23
Aeson Seth
Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2
Yeah, i think fitting a true to scale sized Deathstar into the battle would be hard considering its enourmous size.

I think it would be great to have in the game if it was balanced, ie needs planetary shields.. whenever it moves out it becomes highly vulnerable to attack ect.
Aeson Seth is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-01-2005, 02:03 AM   #24
BeBop
Rookie
 
BeBop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Section 9 Public Security
Posts: 221
Quote:
Originally posted by Darth Alec
how bout destroying it while it's being constucted, unlike the second Deathstar this one probebly woulden't have a gun until complition, and finding it isent a problem either since rebels have a spy network in the game. Think, all those wasted resources on one station and you didn't even get to try it.
I'm with Darth Alec and FroZticles. Don't have it in MP. SP it would be fine with me if it took a long time to build, cost alot (cost even more to give it a planetary based shield), could be discovered and attacked while under construction (which depending on how far it was into production would determine how vulnerable it itself was, going along with Darth Alec don't give it a main gun till it's complete or at least 90% complete.) And maybe if you have some sort of super long range sensors built on the planet it is a attacking, you could launch an attack before it came into firing range. Course these are just ideas.


Tackle Cuddle!
BeBop is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-02-2005, 03:36 AM   #25
Darth Straker
Forumite
 
Darth Straker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: City 17
Posts: 503
Would be amazing if we could build the DEATH STAR.


Death Comes To He Who Crosses Me

Download my Sith Armada Mod for KOTOR I:
http://www.pcgamemods.com/5551

Get my other Mods at:
http://www.pcgamemods.com/u/3626/
Darth Straker is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-19-2005, 09:15 AM   #26
Whimseyboy
 
Whimseyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jedi temple
Posts: 47
Screw planets yavin 4 will finally be destroyed along with the rebel scum. Ohhh and any other planet that gets in my way will be destroyed like dantooaine(I think that is how you spell it?)


Whim
Whimseyboy is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-19-2005, 11:03 AM   #27
Jan Gaarni
Grand Moff
 
Jan Gaarni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,806
LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
To my knowledge, Dantooine were never destroyed.




Empire At War Moderator
&
SWGalaxies Moderator

- What we do in life, echoes in eternity!
- May the pants be with you!

A smile is the shortest distance between people - Victor Borge!


Custom Avatar by Wraith 8
Jan Gaarni is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-19-2005, 11:19 AM   #28
BeBop
Rookie
 
BeBop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Section 9 Public Security
Posts: 221
Perhaps he was referring to the movie where Leia tricks the Imperials into thinking the Rebel base is on Dantooine. Just saying he'd blow it up anyway. I think.


Tackle Cuddle!
BeBop is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-19-2005, 11:29 AM   #29
Jan Gaarni
Grand Moff
 
Jan Gaarni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,806
LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
Hmmm, perhaps you're right.




Empire At War Moderator
&
SWGalaxies Moderator

- What we do in life, echoes in eternity!
- May the pants be with you!

A smile is the shortest distance between people - Victor Borge!


Custom Avatar by Wraith 8
Jan Gaarni is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-21-2005, 09:39 AM   #30
Lex
 
Lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 56
Well, I think Deathstar as in Rebellion is a good idea, it just belongs to Star Wars!
Of course, it has to be well balanced, and if there are really only 20 planets i would actually make it unable to target planets, just ships. Of course it as well has its quadrillions of turbolasers ect. ect.
And of course, a group of Rebel X-Wings can destroy it -_-


As long there is gravity, ride on....
Lex is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > Empire At War > EaW General Discussion > Galactic Discussion > Wanna build the Deathstar? Whats your views?

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.