lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar

Thread: Rancor kills General Veers' AT-AT in 4 hits...
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 02-09-2006, 04:04 PM   #1
DalamarS@
Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Rancor kills General Veers' AT-AT in 4 hits...

That is one mighty powerful Rancor. I hope that's just a "feature" of the Demo. The best part is "Target Maximum Firepower" took half the health of the Rancor.
DalamarS@ is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-09-2006, 05:10 PM   #2
Darth Phantom
Rookie
 
Darth Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 23
Eh...Rancors are powerful. What do you expect? Plus....it's a video game.


Darth Phantom is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-09-2006, 06:00 PM   #3
darthfergie
Q-38 Modulator
 
darthfergie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,254
LFN Staff Member 
lol, wow...that's a little odd.
then again, AT-AT's probably don't have anti-flesh bonuses as much as they have anti-armor bonuses.


darthfergie is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-09-2006, 06:06 PM   #4
Athanasios
Forumite
 
Athanasios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Posts: 561
And not only, it is invalnurable to bombs too
Athanasios is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-09-2006, 06:14 PM   #5
gswift
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lenexa, Kansas (suburb of Kansas City)
Posts: 264
Fear the Rancor

I wouldn't mind if that's the way it is in the release version. After all, the Rancor is neutral, just like the ____ tornado. Also, it's not as unrealistic as it first seems. (I know, it's a game based on a movie, so nothing about it is 'real') With that aside, think about how vulnerable the walkers' legs are and if the Rancor can wipe out an AT-ST or T2-B in one blow, then how long would it take to remove a walker leg. A three-legged walker wouldn't last long.

One more thing: If the Rancor was weak, it wouldn't be fun or worth wile baiting it into the middle of the enemy base. There's nothing more fun than watching him snack on enemy troops.


Gary Swift (aka gswift)
Lenexa, Kansas USA

You can try to monkey-proof your program, but you'll never monkey-proof the monkey.
gswift is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-09-2006, 06:17 PM   #6
Athanasios
Forumite
 
Athanasios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Posts: 561
...you may change your opinion about the "neutral" Rancor when you'll see it as the Emperor's puppy, strolling around in your base...
Athanasios is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-09-2006, 06:39 PM   #7
Thrawn
Grand Admiral
 
Thrawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 4,658
Force Corrupt is a wonderful thing


"Politicians campaign in poetry and govern in prose."
ThRaWn90,RAL_Thrawn,HPGR_Thrawn, Rogue 6
Born And Bred In XWA Country
Thrawn is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-09-2006, 06:50 PM   #8
gswift
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lenexa, Kansas (suburb of Kansas City)
Posts: 264
The Emperor's puppy

Good point. I didn't think about that one. I hope we can do that, and not just the Rancor, the Wampus is probably cool too. I wonder how many different creatures there are? Will swamp planets have droid-eating serpents for example?


Gary Swift (aka gswift)
Lenexa, Kansas USA

You can try to monkey-proof your program, but you'll never monkey-proof the monkey.
gswift is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-09-2006, 07:29 PM   #9
Jmaster3265
Forumite
 
Jmaster3265's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 560
What mod was this where it allowed you to have Veers land battle unit? As far as the rancor destroying him that is very odd. That has never happened to me. Then again i'm not dumb to bring my AT-AT to a rancor. (no offense) My advice is to STAY AWY from rancors.


Jmaster3265 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-09-2006, 08:50 PM   #10
popcorn2008
Little Green Friend
 
popcorn2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 1,239
Well rancors can follow you, ya know. It's not fun. But Jmaster is right, im pretty sure you purposfully moved the at-at to the rancor. At least, im hoping. But thats just anouther element of strategy, looking out for indigenous species.


> Lucas Forums Moderator
> Petroglyph Forums Moderator
> Unofficial Petroglyph Fan Forums Global Moderator
popcorn2008 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-09-2006, 10:03 PM   #11
Thrawn
Grand Admiral
 
Thrawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 4,658
And rocks. Rocks can throw your entire operation into chaos, because well, they're just in the way.


I have no idea where I was trying to go with that joke...


"Politicians campaign in poetry and govern in prose."
ThRaWn90,RAL_Thrawn,HPGR_Thrawn, Rogue 6
Born And Bred In XWA Country
Thrawn is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 12:10 AM   #12
endurell
Rookie
 
endurell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 35
I think we need a video of Veers getting pwnt by a rancor....

...please?


------------------------------------------------------
Viva la Wisconsin!
endurell is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 05:41 AM   #13
Crazyviking03
Rookie
 
Crazyviking03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 16
"Yes my lord, I've reached the main power generators. The shield will be down in OH MY GOD! AGGGHHRLLR"

"General?"


-7th-Admiral Crazyviking03
Admiral of the 7th Fleet
ISD Bringer of War
http://www.freewebs.com/7th_fleet/
Forums: http://s15.invisionfree.com/7th_Fleet_Home_Base/
For the Empire
Crazyviking03 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 06:05 AM   #14
Dagobahn Eagle
First Strike Tester
 
Dagobahn Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 3,513
Current Game: First Strike
Quote:
Rancors are powerful. What do you expect?
Given that this is a modern-day SW game, not much. They threw accuracy, realism, and common sense out the window ages ago.

Quote:
Plus....it's a video game.
I hate worthless cliché "arguments".

Yes, it's a game, but it needs to make sense, too.

Quote:
After all, the Rancor is neutral, just like the ____ tornado.
And that's got what to do with how strong it is?

Quote:
Also, it's not as unrealistic as it first seems.
I know. It's worse.

Quote:
With that aside, think about how vulnerable the walkers' legs are and if the Rancor can wipe out an AT-ST or T2-B in one blow (...)
The AT-AT is blaster-proof, friend. What is more, it appears to be heavy laser-proof, too. It can't just be ripped apart by a three metres tall creature.

And the legs aren't more vulnerable than the rest of the thing. I don't see your reasoning for why it should be, at least, seeing they hold the thing up and thus need to be pretty strong, as they're what the enemy will target.

Oh, and the Rancor cannot wipe out a T2-B or AT-ST in one blow. In the game, maybe, but in "reality"? Come on, now. Maybe it could punch a hole in that pathetic AT-ST, but come on, use your reasoning.

Dagobahn Eagle is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 06:41 AM   #15
shadowsfm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 477
he means, the at-ats and sts are top heavy and easy to knock over
shadowsfm is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 08:08 AM   #16
jedi3112
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 500
Rancors aren't even large enough to avoid being squased by an AT-AT's heavy feet (At-Ats in the game are too small, but that shouldn't have any impact on their statistics). I even found it annoying that General Veers couldn't step on the guy. I expect the only thing to be able to actually damage an AT-AT would be shipturbolasers (and perhaps a T3-B with both it's rockets and duallasers, but you may still need a few of them, and it's the rebels best tank). Just take a look at the Battle of Hoth, none of the rebel cannons could do any damage to the AT-ATs, only the cables did anything.
jedi3112 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 11:21 AM   #17
gswift
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lenexa, Kansas (suburb of Kansas City)
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagobahn Eagle
The AT-AT is blaster-proof, friend. What is more, it appears to be heavy laser-proof, too. It can't just be ripped apart by a three metres tall creature.

And the legs aren't more vulnerable than the rest of the thing. I don't see your reasoning for why it should be, at least, seeing they hold the thing up and thus need to be pretty strong, as they're what the enemy will target.

Oh, and the Rancor cannot wipe out a T2-B or AT-ST in one blow. In the game, maybe, but in "reality"? Come on, now. Maybe it could punch a hole in that pathetic AT-ST, but come on, use your reasoning.
I can see some of the points you're making, however the rancor is at least six meters tall, perhaps more. Do we know how stong they are when not in captivity? I've never seen one on National Geographic and I can't find anything in my Encyclopedia. HeHe. Don't get mad, I'm just having fun.

Secondly, the legs of a walker are their weakness. You said so yourself "as they're what the enemy will target". Remember the battle with the Ewoks? Just like with the tow cable on Hoth, they tripped AT-ST's with vines and rolling logs. AT-ST's are ray-shielded just like AT-AT's. That doesn't protect them from projectiles or crushing blows. Remember the head of an ST getting crushed by logs? I don't think the AT-AT was intended to be indestructable in the movie. They are just shielded from blasters. After all, they are only transports.

To make an analogy with real life engineering: You think something must be strong to hold a heavy load? Find the largest transport plane in the world. The wings hold it up, right? How hard do you think it is to poke a hole in the surface of the wing? How many holes would it take to make it crash?

Another analogy: Your legs hold you up. Try pushing sideways on your knee with the weight of your body. Did you hear something pop, crack, or snap? In fact, the heavier the load is on top, the more vulnerable the supports are.

Third, how do you know the rancor couldn't take out a light tank? There's no way to guess the actual strength of a rancor or the toughness of the tanks. Are the tanks made to resist lazer blasts, or physical blows? Since they hover, I'm guessing T2B's are constructed lightly. Remember how thick the door was in the rancor cage? Maybe it had to be that thick or the rancor would claw it's way through? Don't the rancor's claws resemble a can-opener?

Sure it may not be likely that a rancor would take out an ATAT, but it adds fun to the game.

I know, it's just imaginary stuff, but it's fun to theorise and debate. I'm a geek and proud of it!


Gary Swift (aka gswift)
Lenexa, Kansas USA

You can try to monkey-proof your program, but you'll never monkey-proof the monkey.

Last edited by gswift; 02-10-2006 at 12:04 PM.
gswift is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 11:35 AM   #18
Empirecitizen
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 57
Can we crush the rebels with the ATATs' legs? The should be able to crush things, even tanks. (not to mention those little infantry)
Empirecitizen is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 11:53 AM   #19
Admiral Raven
Rookie
 
Admiral Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 91
I am not so bothered about the amount of damage a rancor can do but the amount of damage they can take, I think surely one shot from an AT AT would kill one but as someone said the target maximum firepower attack only took half of the health off of it. I do however realise that there would be no fun to having it in the game if it was easy to kill but I think at the moment it may be a bit tough.
Admiral Raven is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 12:34 PM   #20
shadowsfm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 477
in glactic battleground they where too easy

in rotj it wasnt full grown
shadowsfm is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 12:49 PM   #21
Darth_Extas
Junior Member
 
Darth_Extas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On the Eclipse destroying anything in my way
Posts: 497
An AT-AT stands for All Terrain-Assault Transport, so in fact you could concider them equal to the Moldy Crow/Millenium Falcon/Imperial Star Destroyer. Since the AT-TE was pre-form of an AT-AT, the function of the AT-AT must be at least similar, the AT-AT is an invasion walker as well as a transport. A rancor could defenity do as much damadge or more like the Ewoks in the Battle of Endor. Have any of you seen a wampa attack a vehicle before, It would be interesting to see the wampa's power vs. a walker, it might actually be the same.



Sig made by Princess Lyla

http://gh.ffshrine.org?r=20872

The Sith will always be around as long as there is hate in the Galaxy.

Dark Hands of the Empire(Clan Member)
Darth_Extas is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 02:46 PM   #22
Crazyviking03
Rookie
 
Crazyviking03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 16
If I remember correctly, wasn't there a scene in Courtship, where they get captured, and the imperial patrol that has them is attacked by rancors, and the AT-ST's get whalloped. I know the agruement is about AT-ATs, but I am just saying, some people are forgeting how big those rancors are supposed to be if full grown. Is the one on Tatooine supposed to be full grown? Jabba's was not.


-7th-Admiral Crazyviking03
Admiral of the 7th Fleet
ISD Bringer of War
http://www.freewebs.com/7th_fleet/
Forums: http://s15.invisionfree.com/7th_Fleet_Home_Base/
For the Empire
Crazyviking03 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 04:28 PM   #23
wswordsmen
Rookie
 
wswordsmen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by gswift
Good point. I didn't think about that one. I hope we can do that, and not just the Rancor, the Wampus is probably cool too. I wonder how many different creatures there are? Will swamp planets have droid-eating serpents for example?
Wampa isn't nearly as powerful (attack at least speed might make it more useful) look at the damage in projectiles in B&G2.6 mod. The damage ratio is like 20 to 1
wswordsmen is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 07:04 PM   #24
Jabbas WhOr3
 
Jabbas WhOr3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 331
As per the www.starwars.com databanks say, a fully grown rancor can get to 10m tall while an AT-AT is listed at 15.5M. So there is a possibilty that it could inflict some damage, but I think that the laser cannons on the AT-AT would blow that thing to bits in one hit.
Jabbas WhOr3 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 10:48 PM   #25
Rok_stoned
Junior Member
 
Rok_stoned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Too close for comfort.
Posts: 402
Current Game: Life.
Quote:
The AT-AT is blaster-proof, friend. What is more, it appears to be heavy laser-proof, too. It can't just be ripped apart by a three metre tall creature.

And the legs aren't more vulnerable than the rest of the thing. I don't see your reasoning for why it should be, at least, seeing they hold the thing up and thus need to be pretty strong, as they're what the enemy will target.
Awesome points! Also dont forget were talkin' 'bout futuristic metals and stuff. Plus the larger animals are, the more I find that their strength-size ratio goes down (ants can lift up to 50 times their weight, lemurs are pretty strong, I can lift twice my body weigth without breaking a sweat, I doubt elephants can lift their body weigth and I know for a fact that whales cannot lift theirs). so I doubt a rancor can destroy something made a s dense as metals, particularly ones stronger than steel. Although I must say, rancors are taller than 3 metres tall; although, they still shouldn't be able to kill a walker.


Rok_stoned is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-10-2006, 11:37 PM   #26
Jmaster3265
Forumite
 
Jmaster3265's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Extas
An AT-AT stands for All Terrain-Assault Transport, so in fact you could concider them equal to the Moldy Crow/Millenium Falcon/Imperial Star Destroyer. Since the AT-TE was pre-form of an AT-AT, the function of the AT-AT must be at least similar, the AT-AT is an invasion walker as well as a transport. A rancor could defenity do as much damadge or more like the Ewoks in the Battle of Endor. Have any of you seen a wampa attack a vehicle before, It would be interesting to see the wampa's power vs. a walker, it might actually be the same.

Are you sure? if i remember correctly it was All-Terrian-ARMORED Transport.

Edit: Found proof =)

http://www.starwars.com/databank/veh...tat/index.html


Jmaster3265 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-11-2006, 12:48 AM   #27
Admiral Sith
Junior Member
 
Admiral Sith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 375
Also, in X-Wing "Isards Revenge" a squadron of X-Wings destroyed 4 AT-ATs with only their laser cannons and implied that a single Proton Torpedo could have finished each. You have to remember that at Hoth the rebels only had very outdated weapons for their Snowspeeders and defenses, the only notable defence they had was the Ion Cannon.



"It may be that the old astrologers had the truth exactly reversed, when they believed that the stars controlled the destinies of men. The time may come when men control the destinies of stars." -Arthur C. Clarke

"Ideals are like stars: you will not succeed in touching them with your hands, but like the seafaring man on the ocean desert of waters, you choose them as your guides, and following them, you reach your destiny." -Carl Schurz
Admiral Sith is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-11-2006, 05:47 PM   #28
Rok_stoned
Junior Member
 
Rok_stoned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Too close for comfort.
Posts: 402
Current Game: Life.
Okay well for those of you who think a rancor could kill a AT-AT consider this: How many of you can destroy a motorcycle with your fists only? (No taking apart, rancors arn't that smart). And on top of that, add two shot guns and two pistols to the bike. And add James Bond (gotta have an experienced pilot) driving the bike. Now add 15 metres between you and the bike; and, you should be dead by now.


Rok_stoned is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-11-2006, 06:35 PM   #29
Jan Gaarni
Grand Moff
 
Jan Gaarni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,806
LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabbas WhOr3
As per the www.starwars.com databanks say, a fully grown rancor can get to 10m tall while an AT-AT is listed at 15.5M. So there is a possibilty that it could inflict some damage, but I think that the laser cannons on the AT-AT would blow that thing to bits in one hit.
That listing is incorrect.

According to the movies themselfs they appear to be around 23 meters tall.




Empire At War Moderator
&
SWGalaxies Moderator

- What we do in life, echoes in eternity!
- May the pants be with you!

A smile is the shortest distance between people - Victor Borge!


Custom Avatar by Wraith 8
Jan Gaarni is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-12-2006, 03:58 PM   #30
Jabbas WhOr3
 
Jabbas WhOr3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan Gaarni
That listing is incorrect.

According to the movies themselfs they appear to be around 23 meters tall.

OH MY GOD!
You disagree with starwars,com databank! Blasphemy!

Quick someone get the holy water and purge this demon from from the forum..
Jabbas WhOr3 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-12-2006, 05:06 PM   #31
Jan Gaarni
Grand Moff
 
Jan Gaarni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,806
LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
They (StarWars.com) also claimed that the Executor was only 8,000 m long too, then 12,600 m, which really was just a change in the unit used for the 8,000 meters to 8,000 miles (which is 12,600 meters).

Guess what, they did some better research and measurements some time in the third quarter of last year, and got to 19,000 meters, which is about 1,500 meters too much, but a hell of alot closer to the truth.
Something I've known for about 6-7 years now, and others even longer.




Empire At War Moderator
&
SWGalaxies Moderator

- What we do in life, echoes in eternity!
- May the pants be with you!

A smile is the shortest distance between people - Victor Borge!


Custom Avatar by Wraith 8
Jan Gaarni is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-12-2006, 05:07 PM   #32
Atomus
Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5
I think it would be more original if they put a krayte dragon on the tatooine map if you do not mind me suggesting. Rancors I would expect to be on a more harsh planet like Dathomir. Though I myself think they are somewhat overpowered.
Atomus is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-12-2006, 05:09 PM   #33
Jan Gaarni
Grand Moff
 
Jan Gaarni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,806
LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
Krayts would have been much better indeed. It's actually big enough (or atleast the ancient ones can be) to knock an AT-AT down.




Empire At War Moderator
&
SWGalaxies Moderator

- What we do in life, echoes in eternity!
- May the pants be with you!

A smile is the shortest distance between people - Victor Borge!


Custom Avatar by Wraith 8
Jan Gaarni is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-12-2006, 06:24 PM   #34
Jmaster3265
Forumite
 
Jmaster3265's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomus
I think it would be more original if they put a krayte dragon on the tatooine map if you do not mind me suggesting. Rancors I would expect to be on a more harsh planet like Dathomir. Though I myself think they are somewhat overpowered.

They probably will if you remb while you were looking at the loading map for Tatooine you saw a short description of the planet. And if you noticed all the creatures it mentioned were in that map. Tuskens, Rancors, Sarlaccs, all except the dragon which might be shown and in the full version. Although it wasn't mentioned in the creatures list at the official site.


Jmaster3265 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-12-2006, 08:00 PM   #35
Rok_stoned
Junior Member
 
Rok_stoned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Too close for comfort.
Posts: 402
Current Game: Life.
IMHO, the rancor should be replaced by a rancor becase a rancor, in my opinion, should be easy to kill by normal tanks multiple AT-STs; also, if they change it to krayt dragon, it would be okay to keep the stats the same way and maybe on dathomir they could have many (severely nerfed) rancors and (maybe a matriarch one).

Just my thoughts.


Rok_stoned is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-12-2006, 11:12 PM   #36
gswift
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lenexa, Kansas (suburb of Kansas City)
Posts: 264
Sure, the rancor is too resistant to blasters, however the AT-AT is geatly overfeared. The legs are surely resistant to blaster bolts, but it's likely they are not very strong, otherwise a small cable wouldn't take them down. Someone argued that the legs must be strong, however I ask you to stand the core of you toilet paper roll on end on your desk. Push down on it and it will take great weight, push on it's side and it crumples easily.

Another person said that the advanced metals would be stronger than steel. Have you seen what a Stealth Bomber is made of? Composites. Graphite composites are light and strong, but can't take physical damage. They are brittle. A simple hammer will make short work of composite structures. The periodic table is what it is, and I don't think the Star Wars universe is so different from ours.

The legs of a walker are also laden with moving parts and joints, and they are long. Long, thin supports are easy to break. The walker is an all-terrain transport, designed to work on many worlds. It's not an indestructable behemoth. It's just a little much for the blasters on a speeder, or anything smaller. Walkers seem to be quite nimble for their size, supporting my theory that they are constructed lightly.

This must be a good debate. It's drawn more interest than most other threads. I must ask why the walker is thought to be so strong. I would think that a tank would be smaller but stonger than an armored transport. Does that not make sense?


Gary Swift (aka gswift)
Lenexa, Kansas USA

You can try to monkey-proof your program, but you'll never monkey-proof the monkey.
gswift is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-13-2006, 08:28 AM   #37
boc120
Rookie
 
boc120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 27
I'm pretty sure that our periodic table rarely, if ever, applies to the Star Wars Universe. They are always talking about things like Tibanna gas, and plastisteel, or transparisteel, and a bazzillion other random minerals that each planet mines for whatever reason. Authors just make up a new one when it fits their need. I'm all for it though, there are a lot of planets in the Star Wars galaxy.
boc120 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-13-2006, 09:25 AM   #38
Darth Alec
Forumite
 
Darth Alec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Searching for the Death Star blueprints....
Posts: 591
AT-ATs are the strongest semi-artillery pieces in the galaksy. But, as someone here pointed out, a toiletpaper roll snaps easily if pushed on the side, but strong if you stand on it.


I am a High Admiral of the Imperial fleet.

Serving the Empire is my destiny, and only Sidious is my lord.

Two starwars parodys...

Starwars gangsta rap

Robot chicken
Darth Alec is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-13-2006, 09:33 AM   #39
jedi3112
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 500
I agree with boc120, I haven't seen any material that comes even close to bacta or kolto. Unless any of you have seen some sort of healing fluid. I bet that would put medics out of business real soon, so they might just keep the fluid a secret. I know I would.

Now AT-ATs are extremely tough. Quite honestly they are the most powerfull thing seen on the ground. Rancors may be tough, but they are still nothing compared to an AT-AT. A single shot from an AT-AT should be more than enough to kill a Rancor (unless it can survive with a really big hole in it's body), and the AT-AT in the game even fires 2 bolts at once. Now a Rancor is not nearly as armored as a shield generator, and in ESB, at maximum firepower the rebel shield goes down in 1 shot, and in the game, the Rancor only loses half it's health. Besides the Rancor will be kicked by the AT-AT when it comes within melee contact. Rancor on it's back, AT-AT walks on, steps on Rancor and there you have it, 1 crushed Rancor. Rancors may be powerfull, but an AT-AT is even stronger. And an AT-TE would be even stronger against one, due to the shorter legs. At some points the AT-TE is better then an AT-AT.

Besides a Crayt Dragon would be more fitting to Tatooine, the may not be as high as an AT-AT, but they are longer in the head to tail. And they are a lot stonger than a Rancor. They eat Banthas and I doubt a bantha fits in a Rancor.
jedi3112 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-13-2006, 09:34 AM   #40
wedge2211
Commander, Rogue Squadron
 
wedge2211's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 2,320
We still have Luke yelling, "that armor's too strong for blasters!" Plus there was that sequence of a Rebel turret firing a ginormous blaster bolt that struck an AT-AT in the knee (the weakest point of the leg) and did no visible damage. The things are strong--certainly not invincible, but very strong against conventional weapons. Certainly they're much stronger than a rancor; and much bigger, too, if you just watch the Return of the Jedi scene in Jabba's dungeon and the Battle of Hoth, watching Luke for scale. The door that slams down on the rancor's head is probably approximately equivalent to an AT-AT's leg squishing it, and the high-grade blasters on the Imperial Walker would probably obliterate the rancor.


wedge2211 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > Empire At War > EaW General Discussion > Galactic Discussion > Rancor kills General Veers' AT-AT in 4 hits...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 AM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.