lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar

Thread: MORE VEHICLES AND BETTER GRAPHICS (duh)
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 12-21-2007, 09:36 PM   #1
darkjedimonkey
Rookie
 
darkjedimonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somewhere in Brazil. My plane crashed.
Posts: 212
MORE VEHICLES AND BETTER GRAPHICS (duh)

Vehicles


I feel limited on vehicles on both single and multiplayer....
I want more than 7 snowspeeders on Hoth. 17 would be more like it.
More than just two Republic Gunships and AT-TE's on Genoisis.
bigger hangars on spaceships
more at at more at st more at te more at ta etc etc

Graphics
In BF1 they managed to get plants on Theed etc
but on other maps there was barely any realness to the whole thing
more than just a painted sky please.
sort of like Halo graphics only better
darkjedimonkey is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 12-24-2007, 02:05 AM   #2
deathclone
Rookie
 
deathclone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 69
in other words for this to happen there gonna need WAY bugger maps


were back *droid guns load*
deathclone is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 12-24-2007, 11:18 AM   #3
darkjedimonkey
Rookie
 
darkjedimonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somewhere in Brazil. My plane crashed.
Posts: 212
not exactly
more vehicles would not mean bigger maps
graphics would though....
darkjedimonkey is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 12-27-2007, 04:49 PM   #4
GeneralPloKoon
Just a Time Traveller
 
GeneralPloKoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,532
Current Game: Borderlands (PS3)
How would graphics mean bigger maps??? More vehicles would equal bigger maps, imagine Hoth exactly the same with 17 snowspeeders, woah! I can't see anything in the sky!!!
GeneralPloKoon is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 12-27-2007, 10:16 PM   #5
darkjedimonkey
Rookie
 
darkjedimonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somewhere in Brazil. My plane crashed.
Posts: 212
hahahahahahahaha
i think 17 snowspeeders would be sweet along with the actual number of at ats.
of course more vehicles would turn the tide of battle with just 200 per army
so more units would have to be involved to equalize that battle
darkjedimonkey is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 01-06-2008, 09:20 PM   #6
dr.w
Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7
starfighters should be re-added to bf3 like in bf1. it isn't as cool with just hoth as the only place with flying vehicles. and they should have larger maps and more troops on each side (with certain advantages for each side like the empire having better weapons but the rebels having better soldiers)
dr.w is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 01-15-2008, 09:32 PM   #7
TKT101
Rookie
 
TKT101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: You don't want to know
Posts: 84
Yes I agree with more vehicles for certian maps.
TKT101 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 01-15-2008, 09:57 PM   #8
Bs|Rogue52
Rookie
 
Bs|Rogue52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 100
yes but for that many tanks/vehicles you might as well forget any soldier type, games have been succsesfull without so many vehicles, maybe expand on space, but i like the current number, anymore would be obnoxious and i would avoid servers with those maps, id rather they put there effort into better hit registry and realsitic enviroment.
Bs|Rogue52 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 01-17-2008, 04:54 PM   #9
darkjedimonkey
Rookie
 
darkjedimonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somewhere in Brazil. My plane crashed.
Posts: 212
true
darkjedimonkey is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-01-2008, 03:03 PM   #10
NL_Sudentor
Rookie
 
NL_Sudentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Holland
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bs|Rogue52
yes but for that many tanks/vehicles you might as well forget any soldier type, games have been succsesfull without so many vehicles, maybe expand on space, but i like the current number, anymore would be obnoxious and i would avoid servers with those maps, id rather they put there effort into better hit registry and realsitic enviroment.

Yes you are right, but maybe they can make vehicles optional. And the numbers too.
NL_Sudentor is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-05-2008, 08:02 PM   #11
Stormtrooper117
Lurker
 
Stormtrooper117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
I think that they should include vehicles but MAKE THEM ACTUALLY DESTROYABLE!!! It takes too long to destroy the jeep-like vehicles with a rocketlauncher. Small vehicles should only need one hit
Stormtrooper117 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-06-2008, 12:15 PM   #12
NL_Sudentor
Rookie
 
NL_Sudentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Holland
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormtrooper117
I think that they should include vehicles but MAKE THEM ACTUALLY DESTROYABLE!!! It takes too long to destroy the jeep-like vehicles with a rocketlauncher. Small vehicles should only need one hit
There aren't jeep like vehicles in the games!!!
They all have armor


The place where I was raised they didn't gave us names, they gave us numbers!
Mine was.... 47

--------Smoki'n weed everyday-------
NL_Sudentor is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-28-2008, 08:32 PM   #13
Micahc
Rookie
 
Micahc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: January
Posts: 238
I think it does only take 1 rocket to destroy a speeder....


Micahc is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-29-2008, 05:07 PM   #14
littleman794
Rookie
 
littleman794's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Inside your soul...
Posts: 189
ya, speeders cant have that much armor or else they wouldn't be so speedy...


Cry me a river, build me a bridge and get over it.
Music is like candy, it is only good without the rapper.
When all is said and done, too many people keep on saying and doing.
littleman794 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 05-01-2008, 03:54 PM   #15
NL_Sudentor
Rookie
 
NL_Sudentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Holland
Posts: 97
Yeah but speeder isn't a jeep like vehicle


The place where I was raised they didn't gave us names, they gave us numbers!
Mine was.... 47

--------Smoki'n weed everyday-------
NL_Sudentor is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 05-05-2008, 12:11 PM   #16
littleman794
Rookie
 
littleman794's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Inside your soul...
Posts: 189
no, it is more like a dirt bike type vehicle....except faster with guns....


Cry me a river, build me a bridge and get over it.
Music is like candy, it is only good without the rapper.
When all is said and done, too many people keep on saying and doing.
littleman794 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-16-2008, 05:20 PM   #17
darkjedimonkey
Rookie
 
darkjedimonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somewhere in Brazil. My plane crashed.
Posts: 212
ok. more vehicles.
darkjedimonkey is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 06-17-2008, 04:40 AM   #18
DeathKnight23
Rookie
 
DeathKnight23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ryloth
Posts: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkjedimonkey View Post
ok. more vehicles.
yeah we get the point


There's something that lurks in the shadows... Its not me, but i wish it was.

"I think we lost something"
"Not to worry, we're still flying half a ship"

"All is lost untill it is found"


Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?
Final Fantasy 7
DeathKnight23 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 07-19-2008, 06:19 PM   #19
darkjedimonkey
Rookie
 
darkjedimonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somewhere in Brazil. My plane crashed.
Posts: 212
yeah but.... more vehicles means all kinds of vehicles. even gigantic battleships. god. i hope bf3 doesnt suck


good day to you.......

meet my little friend.....

HIS NAME IS DEATH
darkjedimonkey is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 07-20-2008, 07:03 AM   #20
Gemini_Thunder
Rookie
 
Gemini_Thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: -Britannia-
Posts: 48
More vehicles would have to equal larger maps. You wouldn't want a bunch of vehicles on a tiny map would you?


“Watch your thoughts, for they become words. Watch your words, for they become actions. Watch your actions, for they become habits. Watch your habits, for they become character. Watch your character, for it becomes your destiny.”
Gemini_Thunder is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 07-21-2008, 07:53 PM   #21
darkjedimonkey
Rookie
 
darkjedimonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somewhere in Brazil. My plane crashed.
Posts: 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralPloKoon View Post
How would graphics mean bigger maps??? More vehicles would equal bigger maps, imagine Hoth exactly the same with 17 snowspeeders, woah! I can't see anything in the sky!!!
actually some one already talked about that problem.


good day to you.......

meet my little friend.....

HIS NAME IS DEATH
darkjedimonkey is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 07-28-2008, 12:32 AM   #22
RC-1183
Junior Member
 
RC-1183's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 470
Current Game: Halo Reach, KotOR II
ya i say more vehicles but not to many like depending on the map size would determine the amount of vehicles same with troops think about it if u had a HUGE map and only 200 troops it would be too easy to get killed cuz they r spread out to far but more troops would be cool and make it more realistic but wat if they added a RTS type thing too were u could buy more troops if u felt u had insuffeciat numbers but there would have to a limit say 2000??? but u have to remember if they added all this it would take a lot longer for the game to come out




Ordo-"If only there was a manuel on females.."
Kal- "If there is i never got my copy"
RC-1183 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 07-28-2008, 04:15 PM   #23
jawathehutt
Its 5 o'clock somewhere
 
jawathehutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,636
Current Game: Age of Empires II
this is not an rts, or rts hybrid game, from now on, lets just ban rts related ideas.



"Everyone that posts here is aware of the game, thanks though." ET
"It is Lucasarts"~ LordJhredmo
jawathehutt is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 07-28-2008, 06:38 PM   #24
Bs|Rogue52
Rookie
 
Bs|Rogue52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by jawathehutt View Post
this is not an rts, or rts hybrid game, from now on, lets just ban rts related ideas.

I agree, please go to the EAW forums for those ideas.


Acta Non Verba
Bs|Rogue52 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 07-30-2008, 05:26 PM   #25
GeneralPloKoon
Just a Time Traveller
 
GeneralPloKoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,532
Current Game: Borderlands (PS3)
Indeed.
GeneralPloKoon is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-03-2008, 12:05 AM   #26
shukkoku
Rookie
 
shukkoku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: BC
Posts: 125
Current Game: Uncharted 2
I think that they will have to WORK to meet our expectations with graphics, but it can be done. If they have mediocre graphics the fans will tare them apart so they are really put on the spot.
and I'm just going say this now. I think that the vehicles are too powerful. half the time I'm getting mowed down by a tank, so that being said I think they should have more vehicles but make them weaker.
Also I think they're should be a mode with No vehicles what so ever.
shukkoku is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-03-2008, 09:05 AM   #27
Bs|Rogue52
Rookie
 
Bs|Rogue52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by shukkoku View Post
I think they're should be a mode with No vehicles what so ever.
I agree.

However good gameplay > good graphics.


Acta Non Verba
Bs|Rogue52 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-03-2008, 05:40 PM   #28
GeneralPloKoon
Just a Time Traveller
 
GeneralPloKoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,532
Current Game: Borderlands (PS3)
Or an option to turn off vehicles. Custom settings!
GeneralPloKoon is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-05-2008, 05:30 AM   #29
NL_Sudentor
Rookie
 
NL_Sudentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Holland
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by shukkoku View Post
I think that they will have to WORK to meet our expectations with graphics, but it can be done. If they have mediocre graphics the fans will tare them apart so they are really put on the spot.
and I'm just going say this now. I think that the vehicles are too powerful. half the time I'm getting mowed down by a tank, so that being said I think they should have more vehicles but make them weaker.
Also I think they're should be a mode with No vehicles what so ever.
Indeed, but that is the meaning of an tank he.

They should ban the boost option with tanks and they alson need to make them slower.

Or AT missiles need to be stronger and maybe (like the battlefield 2 concept)
place some bazooka stations so u don't have to be only rocket unit


The place where I was raised they didn't gave us names, they gave us numbers!
Mine was.... 47

--------Smoki'n weed everyday-------
NL_Sudentor is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-05-2008, 04:02 PM   #30
GeneralPloKoon
Just a Time Traveller
 
GeneralPloKoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,532
Current Game: Borderlands (PS3)
Rocket Turrets! Thats what we need!
GeneralPloKoon is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-05-2008, 05:17 PM   #31
Bokken
Wizard of Yendor
 
Bokken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 566
Current Game: Abandoned Realms
They'd just go boom after AT-AT missiles hit them...


Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJhredmo
It is LucasArts.
Bokken is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-05-2008, 06:21 PM   #32
jawathehutt
Its 5 o'clock somewhere
 
jawathehutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,636
Current Game: Age of Empires II
so dont put atats on every map then



"Everyone that posts here is aware of the game, thanks though." ET
"It is Lucasarts"~ LordJhredmo
jawathehutt is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-06-2008, 06:52 PM   #33
GeneralPloKoon
Just a Time Traveller
 
GeneralPloKoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,532
Current Game: Borderlands (PS3)
A AT-AT on Endor would be funny they would get caught on a tree and explode!
GeneralPloKoon is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-06-2008, 08:37 PM   #34
Bokken
Wizard of Yendor
 
Bokken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 566
Current Game: Abandoned Realms
I didn't only mean AT-ATs, that was a mis-type. Most tank missiles destroy turrets of any type by the second missile launch.


Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJhredmo
It is LucasArts.
Bokken is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-06-2008, 10:55 PM   #35
GeneralPloKoon
Just a Time Traveller
 
GeneralPloKoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,532
Current Game: Borderlands (PS3)
But it would be funny....to blow the turrets up!
GeneralPloKoon is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-06-2008, 11:39 PM   #36
jawathehutt
Its 5 o'clock somewhere
 
jawathehutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,636
Current Game: Age of Empires II
But if the tanks health was lowered, then a good ambush could destroy the tank before it knew what hit it



"Everyone that posts here is aware of the game, thanks though." ET
"It is Lucasarts"~ LordJhredmo
jawathehutt is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-09-2008, 11:48 AM   #37
RC-1183
Junior Member
 
RC-1183's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 470
Current Game: Halo Reach, KotOR II
exactly just like tht but he has a point wat if they put at ats on a map where they couldnt opperate all that well but they could still use their turrets but if they moved they blew up




Ordo-"If only there was a manuel on females.."
Kal- "If there is i never got my copy"
RC-1183 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-10-2008, 10:48 AM   #38
NL_Sudentor
Rookie
 
NL_Sudentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Holland
Posts: 97
And I don't know if its difficult to make but why don't make the vehicles on a way that every part on it could be destroyed!!

For example: If u shoot rocket on the gun turret that it can't be used any longer because it is destroyed but the tank stil go's on and is less effective in battle


The place where I was raised they didn't gave us names, they gave us numbers!
Mine was.... 47

--------Smoki'n weed everyday-------
NL_Sudentor is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-10-2008, 05:40 PM   #39
GeneralPloKoon
Just a Time Traveller
 
GeneralPloKoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1,532
Current Game: Borderlands (PS3)
Very good idea.
GeneralPloKoon is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-12-2008, 03:38 PM   #40
RC-1183
Junior Member
 
RC-1183's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 470
Current Game: Halo Reach, KotOR II
ya exactly why not or if u shot on of the 6 legs on a at-te then it couldnt move but it could shoot




Ordo-"If only there was a manuel on females.."
Kal- "If there is i never got my copy"
RC-1183 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > SWBattlefront.net (SWBF I & II) > Star Wars: Battlefront (DICE) > General Discussion > MORE VEHICLES AND BETTER GRAPHICS (duh)

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 PM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.