lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar

Thread: Save our environment!
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 03-10-2008, 01:00 AM   #1
The Maverick
Lurker
 
The Maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2
Save our environment!

I recently read in a magazine that 56,000 garbage trucks full of solid waste would be eliminaed annually if all 110,000,000 American households paid their bills online instead of receiving paper bills and bank statements. I just thought that was an interesting fact. Is there an interesting fact or idea that you can share that could help save our environment?
The Maverick is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 01:17 AM   #2
Achilles
Dapper Chimp
 
Achilles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,204
Helpful! Veteran Modder Forum Veteran 
Many appliances draw electricity even when they aren't being used.
Achilles is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 01:17 AM   #3
DeadYorick
The Keeper of Peace
 
DeadYorick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,275
Current Game: Pheonix Wright
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Maverick
I recently read in a magazine that 56,000 garbage trucks full of solid waste would be eliminaed annually if all 110,000,000 American households paid their bills online instead of receiving paper bills and bank statements. I just thought that was an interesting fact. Is there an interesting fact or idea that you can share that could help save our environment?
There are a lot of weird facts about the environment. I know that every 30 seconds a child is born while every 2-5 seconds a child dies. Its how the population regulates itself


"There's gotta be a better way to make a living"
-Kyle Katarn
DeadYorick is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 01:18 AM   #4
Rev7
I'm a Mage
 
Rev7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,208
Current Game: CoD 5 WaW; Skate 2
Helpful! 
Erm... don't litter. There are lots of things that we can do...change the type of fuel that cars run off of...there are lots of things that we can do to try to "save our environment".

Rev7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 01:25 AM   #5
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,916
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
Switching from incandescent to flourescent bulbs saves energy. Driving somewhere in the vicinity of the speed limit, as opposed to driving like you're in the Indianapolis 500, saves gas.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 01:59 AM   #6
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Using less AC/heating also saves on fuel consumption (both at home and in the car), though it may be uncomfortable.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 02:36 AM   #7
Corinthian
Banned
 
Corinthian's Avatar
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,165
Why exactly do we need to save our environment? Aren't they always telling us that Mother Nature is a lot more powerful than Mankind?
Corinthian is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 02:46 AM   #8
DeadYorick
The Keeper of Peace
 
DeadYorick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,275
Current Game: Pheonix Wright
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corinthian
Why exactly do we need to save our environment? Aren't they always telling us that Mother Nature is a lot more powerful than Mankind?
Does global warming ring a bell. If we don't care about our environment Mother Nature is going to get so pissed off she is going to rub us off the face of the planet


"There's gotta be a better way to make a living"
-Kyle Katarn
DeadYorick is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 03:00 AM   #9
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achilles
Many appliances draw electricity even when they aren't being used.
Very true, and often overlooked. Even when "turned off" appliances in standby mode still draw electricity, and though it isn't much, when multiplied by several million such devices it equals a lot of wasted power. In most cases this could be rectified by using a battery.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Onasi
Switching from incandescent to flourescent bulbs saves energy.
Also true, but the quality of light that they produce pales (pun intended) in comparison to that produced by incandescent bulbs. Then there's the disposal issue, which presents its own environmental problem as flourescent bulbs contain mercury.

There is a solution, but I don't think that banning incandescent bulbs, as some governments are doing, is it. A good start would be the construction of nuclear power plants.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 03:34 AM   #10
MdKnightR
Senior Member
 
MdKnightR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Feeling Hosed By Your Governme
Posts: 1,859
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corinthian
Why exactly do we need to save our environment? Aren't they always telling us that Mother Nature is a lot more powerful than Mankind?

+1

Google The Planet is Fine by George Carlin

MdKnightR is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 04:17 AM   #11
Arcesious
Trolololololololololololo
 
Arcesious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NE
Posts: 1,876
Current Game: Mass Effect
Once we develope better space travel and advance far enough overall, perhaps we can mine the resources of other planets. That's pretty far off though.


Please feed the trolls. XD
Arcesious is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 04:20 AM   #12
Corinthian
Banned
 
Corinthian's Avatar
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,165
See, Arcescious is right. All we need to do is deploy Nanomachines to strip-mine other worlds. It's not like the rest of the Sol System is inhabited anyway. Well, as far as we know.

And, actually, I have not heard of this Global Warming phenomenon. It's actually at record low temperatures here. Are you sure about this?
Corinthian is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 04:30 AM   #13
Arcesious
Trolololololololololololo
 
Arcesious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NE
Posts: 1,876
Current Game: Mass Effect
Global warming has weird effects on other areas... Like a tornado in florida, and more snow in the rockies, but less ice in the poles. Edit: Oh yeah, and more/worse hurricaines.

Does anyone remember the thread about the world's supply of helium being almost gone? Well... Maybe we can dismantle all those nukes all over the place lying useless and use their uranium to produce some more helium. Or we could in the far future mine helium and other gases off of the sun and gas planets...


Please feed the trolls. XD
Arcesious is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 04:53 AM   #14
Corinthian
Banned
 
Corinthian's Avatar
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,165
That makes...no sense. Logically, if the globe were really heating up, then everything would be heating up. This implies a localized heating, so I'm guessing we've got some kind of Supervillain with his Arctic Heating Ray to blame.

Also, didn't you ever play Fallout, Arcescious? Everybody knows that uranium is going to be one of the resources that drives World War II, we can't afford to get rid of any of that stuff.
Corinthian is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 04:56 AM   #15
Ray Jones
[armleglegarmhead]
 
Ray Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: digital
Posts: 8,256
10 year veteran! LF Jester Helpful! Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcesious
Once we develope better space travel and advance far enough overall, perhaps we can mine the resources of other planets. That's pretty far off though.
Alright. Let's go out there and destroy other worlds, inhabited or not. Let's just behave as if we had learned absolutely nothing during our time on earth.


Ray Jones is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 06:10 AM   #16
Corinthian
Banned
 
Corinthian's Avatar
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,165
Hey, save the habitable worlds for agriculture and such, we can live on Space Stations. Everything else, like desert worlds, ice worlds, volcanic worlds, and dead worlds are suitable for strip-mining.
Corinthian is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 07:20 AM   #17
Ray Jones
[armleglegarmhead]
 
Ray Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: digital
Posts: 8,256
10 year veteran! LF Jester Helpful! Forum Veteran 
They may be future worlds full of life, just like it's here on earth, too.


Ray Jones is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 08:11 AM   #18
Tommycat
>^..^<
 
Tommycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,578
Current Game: Real Life 1.0(BETA)
Forum Veteran 
Hmph... I wish people would quit talking about global warming as if it is a fact that we are causing it. We dump far less contaminates into the atmosphere than mother nature does(I think the last I heard it was less than 1% of greenhouse gasses were caused by man, if someone has accurate figures NOT from a global warming alarmist page, I'd like to see it). I'm all for not trashing our planet. Keep it clean. Don't pollute the waters, and basically don't poop where we eat. I just think this alarmist crap is overboard. Why waste energy protecting against a global heat wave when we could be preparing for a global ice age. That is my reason for not doing anything for global warming. All it would take is a few large eruptions and it wipes out all the good we do by switching everyone to electric cars recharged with solar power.
Tommycat is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 09:40 AM   #19
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
I wholeheartedly agree. It seems like "going green" is the listerine of our time. Global warming is the new bogeyman. There's nothing wrong with trying not to be wasteful, but I refuse to turn my life upsidedown for some unproven artificially constructed crisis to make the Al Gore's of the world that much richer. For those that wish to drink the global warming koolaid, by all means do so......in your own personal life. Just leave the rest of us alone. Good link, btw, MdKnightR.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 10:09 AM   #20
Quanon
Senior Member
 
Quanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lost in my own unconsiciousens
Posts: 2,600
Forum Veteran Veteran Modder Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Totenkopf
I wholeheartedly agree. It seems like "going green" is the listerine of our time. Global warming is the new bogeyman.
True, still I don't think we should test if this artificial crisis can be true...
It would be like if you would put a gun to your head, only you just "heard" and shared thoughts on how this thing could/can kill.

Would you pull the trigger ?

All I learned is that our Planet has seasons of cold/ warmth, now these periods range +100.000 years.
Somehow where dissurpting or are at the start of messing with this system.
Which could turn to some bad bad things... or ofcourse if we're lucky we'll have a tropical paredises everywhere.

IMO, we better just be carfull and mindfull what we do with or resources, industry.
So that we don't end up like in DUNE=> Earth a nice scorchted ball of rock.
*thought those cyborgs where at it... *


TIQUILAAAAAAAA
Quanon is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 11:15 AM   #21
Samuel Dravis
 
Samuel Dravis's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corinthian
That makes...no sense. Logically, if the globe were really heating up, then everything would be heating up. This implies a localized heating, so I'm guessing we've got some kind of Supervillain with his Arctic Heating Ray to blame.
Not necessarily. For example, a change in climate could disrupt warm water currents in the ocean. Such currents are a significant part of the climate (Europe benefits from the Atlantic currents especially). If that happened, it's entirely possible that global warming could result in localized cooling.


"Words are deeds." - Wittgenstein
Samuel Dravis is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 01:06 PM   #22
Ray Jones
[armleglegarmhead]
 
Ray Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: digital
Posts: 8,256
10 year veteran! LF Jester Helpful! Forum Veteran 
Hence why global warming is a somewhat misleading term. However, it's shorter than "the climate is changing in a way it wouldn't without us being wasteful asshats".


Ray Jones is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 01:19 PM   #23
tk102
Well past expiration date
 
tk102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,766
Current Game: Dragon Age: Origins
Forum Veteran Helpful! Notable contributor 
^^
Agreed. The proper term is climate destabilization. More energy in the atmosphere means less stable weather patterns. Think laminar versus turbulent flow.


tk102 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 01:57 PM   #24
Arcesious
Trolololololololololololo
 
Arcesious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NE
Posts: 1,876
Current Game: Mass Effect
Okay... I've done some research. Not about global warming (climate destabilization) though, as that seems to have been answered about how it works. So... Earth. We should work hard to fix the enviroment on earth, and make earth mostly agriculural. First we must colonize the moon, and build industrial plants on the moon to replace the polluting ones on Earth, also, a little strip-mining the moon would help. We've got to be practical about gettign resources.
Next up, Mars.
Mars is pretty far away, but it has many oxide-rich rocks, and other resources. We can make tons of oxygen and water from those oxide-rich rocks. Also, mars has potential to become a habitable planet, however it's resources in things like iron are very great, so strip mining most of mars would be the most useful way to use Mars.
For now we should leave Venus and mercury alone though- to hot to mine either.
Jupiter- A gas planet. A great resource. All of those gases make jupiter a very valuable planet to mine. We just need to invent more pressure resitant alloys and strogner engines to resist it's gravity before we try to mine it. But before that, we can always mine the Asteroid belt near Jupiter. Jupiter has a lot of useful hydrogen and helium, and other gases we haven't found yet deeper in it's atmosphere.
Saturn- We can mine it's rings, and it's got a lot of hydrogen.
Neptune-more Hydrogen and Helium
Uranus-Even more hydrogen and helium... (Also to mention most of these planets planets have some methane, which is also useful)
Pluto, and all of the moons around different planets that were not mentioned can pretty much be for strip mining. Europa has lots of useful ice...
The Kuiper Belt. Lots of rocks there that we can mine, but we don't know much of what's beyond that, besides a few planetoids and the rest of the stars.


Please feed the trolls. XD
Arcesious is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 10:40 PM   #25
Tommycat
>^..^<
 
Tommycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,578
Current Game: Real Life 1.0(BETA)
Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tk102
^^
Agreed. The proper term is climate destabilization. More energy in the atmosphere means less stable weather patterns. Think laminar versus turbulent flow.
See the problem is that we're still making HUGE decisions based on speculation and assumptions. What the current global climate destabilization fanatics are having us do is the "Ready Fire Aim" approach. We're pulling the trigger on things that we have no way of knowing that they will affect positive change on little more than "feel good" measures. These changes are industry stifling, expensive, and dramatic, yet have little chance of affecting the global climate change. Especially when you consider that a volcanic erruption blows enough chemicals into the air that it would undo 10 years worth of our hard work.

I heard on CNN that Australia recently found that the only way to meet their 2020 requirements would be to completely stop using automobiles and start walking and riding bikes. The problem with this (at least as I see it) is that it means that more people have to live near their work to do this. That means if you don't live IN the city, you are pretty much unemployed.
Tommycat is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 11:00 PM   #26
Corinthian
Banned
 
Corinthian's Avatar
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,165
Arsescious, you forgot the various moons and the Asteroid Belt.
Corinthian is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-10-2008, 11:58 PM   #27
tk102
Well past expiration date
 
tk102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,766
Current Game: Dragon Age: Origins
Forum Veteran Helpful! Notable contributor 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommycat
See the problem is that we're still making HUGE decisions based on speculation and assumptions. What the current global climate destabilization fanatics are having us do is the "Ready Fire Aim" approach. We're pulling the trigger on things that we have no way of knowing that they will affect positive change on little more than "feel good" measures.
You're right, let's cross our fingers and hope that the scientists who've been studying all this for a living and reaching independent the same conclusions are just trying to get attention. Let's speculate that this is just the earth doing its thing. Let's assume we can't do anything about it. Let's feel good about global industry and its pollution.

Sorry man that argument cuts both ways.


tk102 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 12:06 AM   #28
mimartin
TOR ate my KotOR
 
mimartin's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,055
Current Game: TOR/FO:NV
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Alderaan News Holopics contributor 
Why should I believe anything the scientist from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration say?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommycat
I heard on CNN that Australia recently found that the only way to meet their 2020 requirements would be to completely stop using automobiles and start walking and riding bikes.
By my count, it is 2008, so in 12 years there will be no technological advances in this area. (I believe it is time to sell my technology stock.) If I recall my history correctly, we took less time to come up with the technology to put two men on the moon and return them back to earth safely. So according to CNN the Australians only alternative is to go back in time 100 years?


mimartin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 12:12 AM   #29
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Though I try to take anything said by anyone these days with a grain of salt, I'd rather err on the side of caution where this subject is concerned.

I think that a lot of people would be more easily persuaded if environmentalism didn't have the polarizing political agenda attached to it.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 12:38 AM   #30
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TK
You're right, let's cross our fingers and hope that the scientists who've been studying all this for a living and reaching independent the same conclusions are just trying to get attention. Let's speculate that this is just the earth doing it's thing. Let's assume we can't do anything about it. Let's feel good about global industry and its pollution. Sorry man that argument both ways.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimartin
Why should I believe anything the scientist from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration say?
You guys aren't suggesting we accept their current conclusions simply on their "authority"? You don't believe these people would never lie to us? Problem is, there is no hard and fast concensus and the debate isn't anywhere near over yet, Al Gore's pronouncements notwithstanding.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 12:55 AM   #31
tk102
Well past expiration date
 
tk102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,766
Current Game: Dragon Age: Origins
Forum Veteran Helpful! Notable contributor 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tot
You guys aren't suggesting we accept their current conclusions simply on their "authority"? You don't believe these people would never lie to us? Problem is, there is no hard and fast concensus and the debate isn't anywhere near over yet, Al Gore's pronouncements notwithstanding.
No I don't believe any scientist with their fancy-dancy scientific methods, numbers, and stuff. They have so many good reasons to lie to us and oppress us with their "theories".

I instead believe in my gubbermint, the oil industry, and the power of the once mighty dollar. They would would never lie to me. No sir.


tk102 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 01:17 AM   #32
Tommycat
>^..^<
 
Tommycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,578
Current Game: Real Life 1.0(BETA)
Forum Veteran 
You assume too much when you make those statements. These scientists have a vested interest in proving that there is global warming(or global climate destabilization, whatever makes you feel better). Keep in mind these same organizations stated in the 70's that we were headed for a global ice age. Give it a few more years and we'll be hearing the same thing again. Perhaps that's why I am a bit skeptical. They are given grants for researching global warming. Several of the scientists the UN used as supporting global warming have actually come out AGAINST man made global climate change.

We're still going on shoot first aim second. Since we have no idea what the real problem is as of yet, making drastic changes is a bit like slamming on your brakes at the first sign of trouble. Sure it might be a good idea, but not on ice. I say hold off on drastic changes until we can be sure of what we need to do.
Tommycat is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 01:52 AM   #33
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tk102
No I don't believe any scientist with their fancy-dancy scientific methods, numbers, and stuff. They have so many good reasons to lie to us and oppress us with their "theories".

I instead believe in my gubbermint, the oil industry, and the power of the once mighty dollar. They would would never lie to me. No sir.
Now, now, TK. Never said the other side was above such behavior. Still, I no more put blind faith in the "priests of the new age" than you would want to in those (religious types) of days gone by (almost anyway it seems).


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 02:26 PM   #34
mimartin
TOR ate my KotOR
 
mimartin's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,055
Current Game: TOR/FO:NV
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Alderaan News Holopics contributor 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommycat
These scientists have a vested interest in proving that there is global warming
Yet, the non-scientists that insist that global warming is a myth have no vested interest in keeping the status quo. Oh, you are correct, the NASA scientist do have a vested interest, in the form of pressure to keep their mouth shut. The New York Times

If you believe in global warming or the tooth fairy does not mean anything. The point is spewing toxic chemicals into the air is not the best of ideas for those of us that actually breathe the air or is there a debate about these chemical being harmful to the human species?


mimartin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 02:46 PM   #35
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,916
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
I've lost all faith in anything the New York Times publishes now after multiple journalist scandals involving fake stories, plagiarism, false leads, and stories making insinuations with little proof to back them up.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 03:01 PM   #36
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Well, you'd be one of many. Seems the paper of record has little record left to run off of anymore. Circulation numbers being but one critical indicator. The problem with changing the status quo is that it's very long on rhetoric and extremely short on viable solutions, especially in the time frame that's being forced on everyone. Demanding draconian cutbacks in some parts of the world, while effectively ignoring other parts (the basic flaws of Kyoto and Rio(?) ) point toward collectivist redistribution of global wealth schemes. Fact is, non scientific types aside, there is NO consensus in the scientific community currently on this topic.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 10:49 PM   #37
Tommycat
>^..^<
 
Tommycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,578
Current Game: Real Life 1.0(BETA)
Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimartin
Yet, the non-scientists that insist that global warming is a myth have no vested interest in keeping the status quo. Oh, you are correct, the NASA scientist do have a vested interest, in the form of pressure to keep their mouth shut. The New York Times

If you believe in global warming or the tooth fairy does not mean anything. The point is spewing toxic chemicals into the air is not the best of ideas for those of us that actually breathe the air or is there a debate about these chemical being harmful to the human species?
You also make the assumption that the people coming out against global warming(man-made global climate change) are non-scientists. In fact quite a few scientists are opposed to the insinuations of global warming(man-made global climate change). The problem is that many institutions shun those scientists as soon as they say they disagree with it.

Then when you look at how poorly the data is being collected(there goes the whole scientific experiment thing) it is difficult to judge how well the scientists can accurately judge the data. I mean there are a number of temperature recorders set up near burn barrels, in the middle of black-tops, near exhaust vents. Those kinds of things can make the data collected useless. Yet they do not dismiss those.

Again, I'm all for keeping the air clean. I'm all for keeping our waters clean. I'm all for having lush forests and places to hunt/fish/hike/camp/whatever, but the measures that are being proposed may in fact cause more harm than good. I mean electric cars produce ground level Ozone. Which sounds all spiffy, but it actually kills plants.
Tommycat is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 10:57 PM   #38
Arcesious
Trolololololololololololo
 
Arcesious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NE
Posts: 1,876
Current Game: Mass Effect
I used to believe global warming was entirely true, but after reading this thread I'm starting to question the validity these scientists' results... However I do admit the we have messed up the world considerably, and need to do soemthing about it.

Tommycat, do electric cars really produce ground-level ozone? I just want proof to clarify it is all, I'm not trying to say it isn't true, because if that is true, then that issue needs to be addressed, since many people are putting faith in the 'age of electric cars' that apparently is coming in the near future, without knowing what consequences there may be.


Please feed the trolls. XD
Arcesious is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 11:11 PM   #39
mimartin
TOR ate my KotOR
 
mimartin's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,055
Current Game: TOR/FO:NV
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Alderaan News Holopics contributor 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommycat
You also make the assumption that the people coming out against global warming(man-made global climate change) are non-scientists.
Is that the same kind of assumption that states all scientists that believe in global warming are liars or alarmist? Alternatively, is it the same kind of assumption that human are small and the earth is large, so there is no possible way that we can affect the environment on such a scale? I apologize for my exhibited assumption; I actually know some scientists do not believe in global warming. I do not even know if I believe in global warming, however I do believe in protecting humankind and Americans. Thus, I believe in cutting back on emissions and Middle Eastern oil. In one case, we will breathe better and in the other, we continue to breathe.


mimartin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-11-2008, 11:15 PM   #40
Tommycat
>^..^<
 
Tommycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,578
Current Game: Real Life 1.0(BETA)
Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcesious
I used to believe global warming was entirely true, but after reading this thread I'm starting to question the validity these scientists' results... However I do admit the we have messed up the world considerably, and need to do soemthing about it.

Tommycat, do electric cars really produce ground-level ozone? I just want proof to clarify it is all, I'm not trying to say it isn't true, because if that is true, then that issue needs to be addressed, since many people are putting faith in the 'age of electric cars' that apparently is coming in the near future, without knowing what consequences there may be.
EVERY electrical device produces a small amount of ozone. It's that smell from the electric motors. The more prominent the smell, the more ozone is being produced.

Actually, I'm not too proud to admit I was wrong. Actally I was wrong about the levels of ozone(well I guess I hadn't explained fully) An electric car would produce much less ozone than the standard 1970's era car. However compared with modern cars, it produces about 98% of the level of ozone. Plus when you offset that with power generation, lead acid batteries that need to be replaced, chemicals used in the creation of the power storage(batteries), non-reusable parts that will be tossed out, it kinda makes the gasoline car a nicer option.

@mimartin:
Trust me, I'm all for our independance from middle-eastern oil, but we only get around 10% from them. We get most from Venezuela.

As far as your other comment regarding the scientists being liars, I believe the CATO Institute(yeah I know... hardly without bias) found that several of the scientists were pressured to change their results to be more in line with current expectations regarding global climate change. They may not be the ones who want to lie, but many of the grant holders aren't as honest as many scientists.
Tommycat is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > Knights of the Old Republic > Community > Kavar's Corner > Save our environment!

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 AM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.