lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar

Thread: Socialism Questions
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 02-23-2010, 06:36 PM   #1
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Socialism Questions

http://rawstory.com/2010/02/child-su...ized-medicine/
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/20...icine-victim.-
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.ac...59174697244816

Tripp's grandfather Todd is a descendant of the Yup'ik Eskimo, and thus, his children and grandchildren are registered with the Curyung Tribal Council, part of the Bristol Bay Native Association. Further, this means they are eligible for government-run health insurance through the Indian Health Service.

Bristol Palin's lawyers argued that exemptions claimed by Johnston's attorneys were invalid due to Tripp's health coverage by the IHS. On page eight of the court documents:

"There are two reasons why this request should be rejected. First, Levi has never paid for any health insurance. One cannot seek deduction for costs or support one has never paid. Second, this insurance is unnecessary. Tripp is an enrolled member of Curyung Tribal Council within the Bristol Bay Native Association consortium. Because the majority of Tripp's health care costs are already covered by IHS and the Alaska Native Medical Center, Mr. Johnston has no need to purchase additional health insurance and his deduction should not be allowed."

------

Federal Employees Health Benefits Program
http://public-healthcare-issues.suit...he_us_congress
http://www.opm.gov/insure/health/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal...nefits_Program

"As soon as members of Congress are sworn in, they may participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). The program offers an assortment of health plans from which to choose, including fee-for-service, point-of-service, and health maintenance organizations (HMOs). In addition, Congress members can also insure their spouses and their dependents."

"The FEBHP's cost is about $40 billion in 2010, including both premiums and out-of-pocket costs. It enrolls about 4 million employees and annuitants and, with their dependents, 8 million persons in total."

"Choices among health plans are available to employees during an "open enrollment" period, or "open season," after which the employee will be covered fully in any plan he or she chooses without limitations regarding pre-existing conditions."

“Members of Congress have their own pharmacy, right in the Capitol. They also have a team of doctors, technicians and nurses standing by in case something busts in a filibuster. They can get a physical exam, an X-ray or an electrocardiogram, without leaving work.”

"The employer* pays an amount up to 72 percent of the average plan premium for self-only or family coverage (not to exceed 75 percent of the premium for the selected plan), and the employee pays the rest."

*Note: The Employer being the Tax Payers

"In enacting the Medicare Modernization Act in 2003, the Congress explicitly modeled the reformed Medicare Advantage program and the new Medicare Part D Prescription Drug program after the FEHBP."

-------------

So... Socialist Health Care is evil then why are we allowing our government officials the option of socialist government-run health care? Shouldn't Sarah and the rest of us being trying our hardest to get Tripp out of a system that, she claims, is evil? If Dick Cheney hates Socialist Health Care so much, then why is he currently using his own to fix his latest heart attack?

If Socialist Health Care is so bad, then why did Rush Limbaugh praise Hawaii's progressive Health Care system after getting a heart checkup and then, when he was called out for it, turned around and said "no, wait, it does suck after all"?
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/dai...106.guest.html

Isn't the saying, "You can't have your cake and eat it too"? Can they go to the conventions and so on and rail on socialism and death panels while they ride the health care gravy train on my tax money? Can they say that socialist health care is evil, but be fine with their grandson using socialist health care right under their nose especially when they're a millionaire and a former federal official using government run health care?

Congress and governor Seats, sure, but then you've got police, firemen, street repair, road building, public schooling, and so on using tax money for socialist means. Hell, aren't taxes socialist by today's current political standards? Shouldn't we close down public schools since the teachers are running on socialist funding? How about the police force? They're paid in tax dollars and their Health Care is paid by the state. Do I really want to be driving on a freeway created by the socialist agenda? How about those socialist libraries?

Do I really want a military running almost entirely on socialism? Shouldn't the entire thing be capitalist? Are we not crippling our military by powering it with our tax dollars? And why are veterans whining about injuries? Shouldn't they pay for their own mistakes?

So, why the hypocrisy?

Seriously, I must be missing something because this just doesn't seem right at all. I'm not trying to be sarcastic, demeaning, etc. I'm genuinely curious at why we allow something that is apparently so incredibly evil. I know there are plenty of people on this board against socialism, so I'd like to hear your take.

Speaking of which:

To all citizens outside the United States running on Socialism:


How are your Death Panels run?
How many mentally disabled people do you execute on a daily basis?
Are older citizens given a choice, or are they killed on the spot?
How long was the longest you had to wait for care?
How crippling are your taxes overall?
How many dead people are in the clinic lobby's on average?
Are you allowed property?
How many kids are you allowed to have?
How long have you been a communist?
How long have you hated Jesus?

You think I'm joking? I listen to Glenn, Rush, Fox, and watch the Republican speakers so I'm straight faced asking you all how terrible your lives are. Feel free to correct me, but from my understanding those are all completely valid questions.

Last edited by True_Avery; 02-23-2010 at 08:07 PM.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-23-2010, 07:37 PM   #2
Pavlos
Scruffy Englishman
 
Pavlos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The real world/ivory towers
Posts: 1,974
Current Game: Viking Warrior Poets
Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
How are your Death Panels run?
Weekly meetings: there's a government target of three hundred deaths a week but the current average is unfortunately just shy of 200 (another New Labour failure, I say). We mostly pick from out of the white Anglo-Saxon middle classes, generally protestants. The board is unashamedly pro-Arab Catholics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
How many mentally disabled people do you execute on a daily basis?
Unfortunately, until the new NHS database is set-up we won't be able to get statistics on the daily operations of the Death Panel. I read somewhere that the number is generally around five.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
Are older citizens given a choice, or are they killed on the spot?
Of course they're given a choice. It's much harder to kill someone if their in hysterics over not having the right type of tea. That said, the government are trying to push a new "Tea Variety Card" bill through parliament, which is set to speed up the entire process. Yet I can't help but feel that having all that information on some super-computer, readily accessible by the execution staff dehumanises the whole affair somewhat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
How long was the longest you had to wait for care?
12 years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
How crippling are your taxes overall?
I am forced to have children just to have a cheap alternative to turkey at Christmas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
How many dead people are in the clinic lobby's on average?
None... why would you want dead people lolling around the lobby? What an absurd question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
Are you allowed property?
We have no desire for property. Property is simply a distraction from the work of the motherland.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
How many kids are you allowed to have?
Four at any one time, excluding those reared for Christmas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
How long have you been a communist?
Since I first hated Jesus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
How long have you hated Jesus?
Since I became a communist.


StarWarsKnights.com -- News and features will be returning shortly...

I 'gin to be a-weary of the sun,
And wish the estate o' the world were now undone.
Pavlos is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-23-2010, 07:39 PM   #3
Ping
Elementary.
 
Ping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 771
Roleplayer 
Are those last questions jokes? I know you said they weren't, but to me, they just seem, no offence, ridiculous.

And, in answer to your question about the hypocrisy going around...well, I don't really know why. Though, I will admit, after reading articles in Time magazine, I've come to the conclusion that the Republicans are, unfortunately, nothing but hypocrites in this time and age. They're trying to discredit Obama and the Democrats by whatever means possible, and I guess that means they're willing to become hypocrites in the process. The worst part is that it's working. Trust in the government is at an all time low, the Tea Parties are forming, and nobody seems to notice that the Repubs are just contradicting themselves. I really would like to believe that the Republicans are not trying to be hypocrites, I really do, but that is most definitely not the case at this point. George Washington was right - political parties don't make you loyal to your nation, it makes you loyal to your party.


"There is no such thing as coincidence, only inevitability" - xxxHoLiC

"Justice? But I don't serve justice, Watson, I serve the truth." - Sherlock Holmes
Ping is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-23-2010, 07:42 PM   #4
Darth InSidious
A handful of dust.
 
Darth InSidious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Eleven-Day Empire
Posts: 5,758
Current Game: KotOR II
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlos View Post
We have no desire for property. Property is simply a distraction from the work of the motherland.
Non-gender-exclusive, ethnic and non-prejudiced motherland. Evidently you need more time at the Ministry of Information, comrade 61528-P.



Works-In-Progress
~
Mods Released
~
Quid existis in desertum videre?
Darth InSidious is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-23-2010, 07:43 PM   #5
Samnmax221
I never Kipled
 
Samnmax221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: My hovercraft is full of eels
Posts: 5,784
Current Game: Sex with women
Forum Veteran LF Jester 
Sarah Palin should fall down a hole someplace and die.
Samnmax221 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-23-2010, 07:56 PM   #6
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ping View Post
Are those last questions jokes? I know you said they weren't, but to me, they just seem, no offence, ridiculous.
Every one of my questions I've asked are reasons against socialism given by Savage, Rush, Fox, and Republican speakers. If they are valid reasons given by speakers and politicians on why socialism is evil, then there must be something to them, especially when it is evident that people believe them because they state them at rallies in voice and on signs.

If these people take them as serious stances, then I'll use them as serious questions. As you say below, the Tea Party and so on have been gaining supporters by the day.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ping
And, in answer to your question about the hypocrisy going around...well, I don't really know why. Though, I will admit, after reading articles in Time magazine, I've come to the conclusion that the Republicans are, unfortunately, nothing but hypocrites in this time and age. They're trying to discredit Obama and the Democrats by whatever means possible, and I guess that means they're willing to become hypocrites in the process. The worst part is that it's working. Trust in the government is at an all time low, the Tea Parties are forming, and nobody seems to notice that the Repubs are just contradicting themselves. I really would like to believe that the Republicans are not trying to be hypocrites, I really do, but that is most definitely not the case at this point. George Washington was right - political parties don't make you loyal to your nation, it makes you loyal to your party.
Still, by being so heavily anti-socialism aren't they effectively trying to undermine their own socialist health care that they themselves use? Schooling? Military Funding? The public libraries in which Glenn Beck states he read books on why socialism and taxes are evil?

What is there to gain from it? Isn't that self destructive?

Last edited by True_Avery; 02-23-2010 at 08:07 PM.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-23-2010, 10:10 PM   #7
Ping
Elementary.
 
Ping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 771
Roleplayer 
Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
What is there to gain from it? Isn't that self destructive?
Yes, it is, but they're playing us for fools, meaning they think most Americans will believe anything, or not do the proper research.


"There is no such thing as coincidence, only inevitability" - xxxHoLiC

"Justice? But I don't serve justice, Watson, I serve the truth." - Sherlock Holmes
Ping is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-24-2010, 11:35 PM   #8
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,778
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ping View Post
And, in answer to your question about the hypocrisy going around...well, I don't really know why. Though, I will admit, after reading articles in Time magazine, I've come to the conclusion that the Republicans are, unfortunately, nothing but hypocrites in this time and age.
C'mon, Ping, are you implying that hypocrisy is only a republican problem?:

http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-dems-i...unders-intent/

And then there's this:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1477872/

If the Canadian system is as great as advertised, why would a Canadian pol come south of the border for his med treatment? One type of behavior for the rich/ruling class and another for the rest?

Face it, hypocrisy is human and indiscriminate......and in great abundance in politics. It's often wedded to condescension.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
So... Socialist Health Care is evil then why are we allowing our government officials the option of socialist government-run health care? Shouldn't Sarah and the rest of us being trying our hardest to get Tripp out of a system that, she claims, is evil? If Dick Cheney hates Socialist Health Care so much, then why is he currently using his own to fix his latest heart attack?

Congress and governor Seats, sure, but then you've got police, firemen, street repair, road building, public schooling, and so on using tax money for socialist means. Hell, aren't taxes socialist by today's current political standards? Shouldn't we close down public schools since the teachers are running on socialist funding? How about the police force? They're paid in tax dollars and their Health Care is paid by the state. Do I really want to be driving on a freeway created by the socialist agenda? How about those socialist libraries?

Do I really want a military running almost entirely on socialism? Shouldn't the entire thing be capitalist? Are we not crippling our military by powering it with our tax dollars? And why are veterans whining about injuries? Shouldn't they pay for their own mistakes?

So, why the hypocrisy?

Seriously, I must be missing something because this just doesn't seem right at all. I'm not trying to be sarcastic, demeaning, etc. I'm genuinely curious at why we allow something that is apparently so incredibly evil. I know there are plenty of people on this board against socialism, so I'd like to hear your take.
Not quite sure how you jump to conclusion that govt employees receiving benefits, as do many in the private sector with their employers, is axiomatically socialist. Govt. by its nature is not automatically socialist or communist b/c it's govt.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman

Last edited by Totenkopf; 02-25-2010 at 04:29 AM.
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 09:14 AM   #9
Ping
Elementary.
 
Ping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 771
Roleplayer 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Totenkopf View Post
C'mon, Ping, are you implying that hypocrisy is only a republican problem?:

http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-dems-i...unders-intent/

And then there's this:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1477872/

If the Canadian system is as great as advertised, why would a Canadian pol come south of the border for his med treatment? One type of behavior for the rich/ruling class and another for the rest?

Face it, hypocrisy is human and indiscriminate......and in great abundance in politics. It's often wedded to condescension.
I wasn't implying that it was solely a Republican problem, what I was trying to say is that to me it's a bit more widespread, or just more obvious to everyone else. And I should also point out that I get the feeling that most of the party is doing it, too.


"There is no such thing as coincidence, only inevitability" - xxxHoLiC

"Justice? But I don't serve justice, Watson, I serve the truth." - Sherlock Holmes
Ping is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 01:15 PM   #10
Drunkside
Satan´s little helper
 
Drunkside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The land of snow and sorrow
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
Are you allowed property?
Is that really used as an argument by somebody? And people are buying it? Or you just raving ? Even the people of the soviet union were allowed to have property, they were allowed to own their houses, cars and a lot of other stuff. The only thing they werent allowed to own was industrial machinery. Shocking eh?


Saivo´s New demo, A Cruel Northern Land is out! Listen to it on our mikseri.net bandpage.

http://www.mikseri.net/artists/?id=117610
Drunkside is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 02:10 PM   #11
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,778
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ping View Post
I wasn't implying that it was solely a Republican problem, what I was trying to say is that to me it's a bit more widespread, or just more obvious to everyone else. And I should also point out that I get the feeling that most of the party is doing it, too.
Even if you change the word "only" to primarily, that's a very skewed view. It would be much like if you'd been reading The Weekly Standard and concluded that corruption and hypocrisy were mostly a glaring democrat problem. I'd say that if you're reading material that favors one side over the other that you're likely to walk away with such a cock-eyed view.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 02:25 PM   #12
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
I wasn't aware that something is automatically socialist in nature simply because it's financed by taxes. That would mean that all government is socialist in nature, which is completely untrue. I can certainly see the benefit to convincing everyone that it is true, however.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samnmax221 View Post
Sarah Palin should fall down a hole someplace and die.
And I'd help dig the hole, but what everyone needs to realize is that the best weapon to use against an attention whore like Sarah Palin is to stop paying attention to her. Without attention to absorb she'll dry up and blow away like any other piece of fecal matter.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker

Last edited by Q; 02-25-2010 at 03:06 PM. Reason: Thread keeps getting pruned. I'm so confused...
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 07:47 PM   #13
Darth Avlectus
Your point?
 
Darth Avlectus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Attack on Titan
Posts: 4,229
Current Game: Soul Calibur 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
So... Socialist Health Care is evil then why are we allowing our government officials the option of socialist government-run health care?
Actually, lots of US citizens dislike it intensely that gov't. officials are allowed it. We shouldn't. So, why does it happen? Suppose there are things we have no control over. Like this. Personally I'm sick of the lack of leadership and lack of good example provided. By both parties. They may be employed by the gov't, but that shouldn't mean they get any more privledge than we little people do. And if I get the ire of people in general who work for the government for holding my beliefs...so be it. We ought to fight it.

As well, we have a president that promised us transparency, afterall. However he is powerless to stop the senate members from shutting the door on the press. That's not even going into if whether or not he approves of whatever deals are made behind closed doors. So we'll have to just leave it at that. Point here is I don't necessarily blame the president b/c of a lack of transparency due to Reid and Pelosi--but he'd be remiss in his position if he didn't try to do something to correct it to keep his promise.

Quote:
If Dick Cheney hates Socialist Health Care so much, then why is he currently using his own to fix his latest heart attack?
Just because he is being a hypocrite doesn't mean anyone with the same leanings necessarily agrees with him or his actions.

It's on him.

Also I'd like to add: If a political conservative is for less government overall and protecting our freedoms and liberties then Cheney (no liberal votes notwithstanding) is a s***ty example of one. Why do I say this? Considering: the patriot act tripled the size of overall government, indiscriminantly, and took away many smaller freedoms and liberties. He FAILED to keep government down and to protect our freedoms.

Some say at the cost of those we are granted better security. Ok. Slippery as this slope is I think this question is worth asking: When we give up freedoms to the government, will we ever get them back? If so, when?

It should have been applied with checks and balances like time limits and laser slim focus on the areas of power allowed to the gov't. Just my opinion.

For ignoring all this, I really dislike him. I even mistrust him. Because of his and Bush's actions, this is what the opposition thinks of, EVERY TIME when anyone mentions their rightward leaning political views. Not that Keith Olberdouche would really care. But still...

Last note: I'm not altogether sure Dick Cheney is completely human anyways.

Quote:
(Rush Limbaugh) *brevity*
Same goes here with the pundits. If there are people who go with it when someone is being a hypocrite, let 'em defend themselves and each other.

You're only paying this much attention to it with these folks because you have such an obvious dislike of them. Come on, They all do it.

Quote:
*brevity*
So, why the hypocrisy?
Perhaps it's the times we live in. Nobody means just what they say.

All I can say is if anyone is truly open minded, they don't conflate the misguided actions of a leader (or of the few) under that banner to individuals who may agree with that banner in general. Nor should you assume that any such individuals necessarily agrees with those actions. It would not be right if, for example, I blamed my neighbors in NV for the hypocrisy of some butt-wipe senator in another state, no matter how much my neighbors loved that senator. However, I am well within my means to lambaste them for continuing going along with that senator's actions thereafter.

That same hypocrisy is not exclusively nor predominantly (EDIT: not permanently as though naturally ingrained, anyways) to one side or the other as though it were a (born in) trait. I'm not going to point the finger, but will say the left are just as guilty on hypocrisy as the right. It shifts around from time to time with both sides. (Depending on issues and people involved.) You could look for it on both sides and find it.

Hypocrisy itself: It is disappointing, yes. It is at least as disappointing if not moreso when one who strongly identifies with the right (being all about self governance and self reliance) decides to turn around and use government run services for their little things.

The turncoat actions of some in charge: I don't condone them, personally. Why would I? I'm only shooting myself in the foot if I did. And frankly neither should anyone else. While hypocrisy is frustrating, annoying, evil, and as I said before, disappointing, it is hardly a surprise.

It's wrong. You know this. So let's be real: It's nothing new. It happened since long ago, and will probably continue forever more until the human race can no longer make decisions for itself.

And since this hypocrisy largely seems to revolve around social issues of taxing and spending: While we cannot completely cut out government and we do need laws, it ought to be minimal, but strongly enforced.

Tax and spend...no financial, fiscal conservativism at all. Shame. So nice how no parties actually use that as a policy anymore.

We as a nation could really stand to just step on the brakes w.r.t. spending. Especially if cutting taxes. I'm not big on international dealings but it might actually help the U.S. if we weren't in the red all the time. Our creditors/lenders might relax a little more at least.

Last edited by Darth Avlectus; 02-25-2010 at 11:58 PM. Reason: apparent in parenthesis
Darth Avlectus is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 08:27 PM   #14
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
I'll respond to more later, but am low on time atm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
I wasn't aware that something is automatically socialist in nature simply because it's financed by taxes. That would mean that all government is socialist in nature, which is completely untrue. I can certainly see the benefit to convincing everyone that it is true, however.
Interesting Then what constitutes socialism?

–noun
1.
a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of productionand distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
2.
procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3.
(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfectimplementation of collectivist principles.

If a Library is being funded by Tax Dollars given by the community (via state), isn't it not a socialist building? Or, is it not because of a government medium?

Is not the road socialist because it is a "building" created by community money and not a capitalistic system? The police a government run, but socially/community funded group?

Indeed, a "government" does not need to be socialist in nature, but since our government is community funded is it not a socialist republic? Or, is it not socialist because the community doesn't have direct control? But, then what is voting?

So, again, either I'm missing something in translation or much that is funded by taxes/community is indeed socialist by definition. If "universal" Health Care is socialist because it is paid with tax money, then I currently fail to see how everything else paid for by taxes isn't socialist. Same goes for the bailouts being socialist. The current, political/media definition I see simply seems to paste "socialist" on anything with tax dollars next to it. Even put Tax Dollars aside and just look at churches and charities; are they not also socialist for being community funded?

I am not attempting to so much convince as I am trying to get my facts straight here, so if someone has a more solid definition of socialism I'd like to hear it.

Last edited by True_Avery; 02-25-2010 at 08:39 PM.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 08:50 PM   #15
Ping
Elementary.
 
Ping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 771
Roleplayer 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Totenkopf View Post
Even if you change the word "only" to primarily, that's a very skewed view. It would be much like if you'd been reading The Weekly Standard and concluded that corruption and hypocrisy were mostly a glaring democrat problem. I'd say that if you're reading material that favors one side over the other that you're likely to walk away with such a cock-eyed view.
Where the hell did that come from? I didn't use the word "only" at any point. Besides, the Repubs are being nothing but whining brats, and if there is one thing I can't stand, it's spoiled brats.


"There is no such thing as coincidence, only inevitability" - xxxHoLiC

"Justice? But I don't serve justice, Watson, I serve the truth." - Sherlock Holmes
Ping is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 11:27 PM   #16
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,778
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
I'd advise you to read what you wrote again. You didn't have to write either "only" or "primarily" as it is painfully obvious that you believe it anyway. Your words were "I wasn't implying that it was solely", ie. only, but in fact you were implying just that. Your last observation above merely reinforces that implication. But outside of coloring inside the lines of the OP, which addresses issues of "hypocrisy", this issue is ancillary to the main question of whether or not govt is, somehow by its nature, axiomatically socialist. But given that you claim to have a negative predisposition toward "whining brats", it's a wonder you can embrace the democrat party either. So, if you wish to provide any further evidence that one party is more full of whiny hypocrites than the other, you can always PM that info.

Quote:
–noun
1.
a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of productionand distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
The current system in America doesn't do just that b/c there is private ownership of the means of production and distribution. Last I saw, the govt still has to make use of private contractors to supply it with the resources it needs to carry out it's responsibilities under law. While the US has become quasi-socialist, thanks to FDR, it's still not socialist (nor is much of Europe ACTUALLY socialist, just much closer--or perceived as such--than America).


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-26-2010, 12:49 AM   #17
Samnmax221
I never Kipled
 
Samnmax221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: My hovercraft is full of eels
Posts: 5,784
Current Game: Sex with women
Forum Veteran LF Jester 
Mixed markets markets are at work in all the "nice countries" of the world, Sarah Palin is a dumb bitch, and teabaggers are insane. AAnnd thread.
Samnmax221 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-26-2010, 12:54 AM   #18
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,778
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Lighten up Sam, someone might think you're that dbag Levi Johnston.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-26-2010, 08:43 AM   #19
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
Interesting Then what constitutes socialism?
Put simply, it's government ownership of all production and complete government control of commerce and distribution of wealth, with no private ownership at all. We don't have that here, at least not yet. Obama and his flunkies are working on it, though. The recent government takeover of GM and its giving of a controlling interest to the UAW as a reward for driving the corporation into the ground is a poignant example of this and the corruption that accompanies it.

A government service isn't socialist by default. It would only qualify as such if it somehow supported the above. So while the police, fire and highway departments are not inherently socialist in nature, I'd have to say that the public school system most definitely is.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker

Last edited by Q; 02-26-2010 at 11:33 AM.
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-26-2010, 05:57 PM   #20
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
Put simply, it's government ownership of all production and complete government control of commerce and distribution of wealth, with no private ownership at all. We don't have that here, at least not yet. Obama and his flunkies are working on it, though. The recent government takeover of GM and its giving of a controlling interest to the UAW as a reward for driving the corporation into the ground is a poignant example of this and the corruption that accompanies it.

A government service isn't socialist by default. It would only qualify as such if it somehow supported the above. So while the police, fire and highway departments are not inherently socialist in nature, I'd have to say that the public school system most definitely is.
Ohhh, ok, so since we have private security, firefighters, and so contractors who build the highway they aren't fully socialist since there is competition?

Ok, that actually makes a good deal of sense. But, in that case, public schooling wouldn't be socialist because of private schooling being an option, right?
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 11:19 AM   #21
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
For what percentage of school-aged children is private schooling a realistic option?


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 02:41 PM   #22
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
For what percentage of school-aged children is private schooling a realistic option?
Not asking if it is a realistic option. Asking if the very fact the option exists as even low level competition means that public schooling isn't socialist according to your guidelines. Private Firefighters aren't seen very often, but you seem to consider government paid firefighters to not be socialist in nature.

Also, my former High School went charter and has control over the spending of its own money so, even though it is public, the charter public schools have private control and also don't seem to fit your guidelines.

Last edited by True_Avery; 02-27-2010 at 02:56 PM.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 04:57 PM   #23
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
Private Firefighters aren't seen very often, but you seem to consider government paid firefighters to not be socialist in nature.
Probably because, last time I checked, firefighters aren't pushing the socialist agenda. The public school system, on the other hand, is notorious for doing just that, which is why I called it socialist.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 08:08 PM   #24
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
Probably because, last time I checked, firefighters aren't pushing the socialist agenda. The public school system, on the other hand, is notorious for doing just that, which is why I called it socialist.
I've asked before and I'll dare another ask:

What is the "socialist agenda", and how it the public school "socialist"?

Gonna be honest here and say that, right now, "socialist agenda" just looks like a red herring label for something you disagree with.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 09:07 PM   #25
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
I probably would have done better to use wording that didn't sound like propaganda, but it fits in this case. The public school system is the greatest exponent of socialism in this country because it indoctrinates children at a young age to the ideals of socialism by encouraging conformity while discouraging individuality. Conformist children are groomed for success while individuals are groomed for failure by being singled out, persecuted and harassed to the point of suicide (or murder) by the conformist students while the faculty either turns a blind eye or even joins in. Conformists are far easier to govern and control by the mere threat not fitting in, and I happen to regard them as something less than human.

Go ahead and think that I'm throwing out "red herring labels for something (I) disagree with" if you wish. I know better because I've lived it and experienced it first-hand. Needless to say, I hate conformity with a purple passion.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker

Last edited by Q; 03-02-2010 at 09:13 PM.
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 09:17 PM   #26
jrrtoken
Senior Member
 
jrrtoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,995
I wouldn't say that conformity within society is a trait of socialism, but of pseudo-capitalism. Conformity allows for more "team-players", which are essential components of mega-corporate ideology: More agreement, more productivity.

The principle has been present in American society since the late-1800's when industrialism was in full swing, but I think that the modern phase has been forged in post-WWII suburbia. It's social-oriented, yes, but not directly for state or government, but for corporate prosperity.
jrrtoken is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 09:20 PM   #27
Ping
Elementary.
 
Ping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 771
Roleplayer 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
I probably would have done better to use wording that didn't sound like propaganda, but it fits in this case. The public school system is the greatest exponent of socialism in this country because it indoctrinates children at a young age to the ideals of socialism by encouraging conformity while discouraging individuality. Conformist children are groomed for success while individuals are groomed for failure by being singled out, persecuted and harassed to the point of suicide (or murder) by the conformist students while the faculty either turns a blind eye or even joins in. Conformists are far easier to govern and control by the mere threat not fitting in, and I happen to regard them as something less than human.

Go ahead and think that I'm throwing out "red herring labels for something (I) disagree with" if you wish. I know better because I've lived it and experienced it first-hand. Needless to say, I hate conformity with a purple passion.
I wouldn't go so far as to label it socialism, but I do see your point. I've personally been through similar experiences. Finally, someone I can relate to.


"There is no such thing as coincidence, only inevitability" - xxxHoLiC

"Justice? But I don't serve justice, Watson, I serve the truth." - Sherlock Holmes
Ping is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 09:21 PM   #28
urluckyday
Up all night to get lucky
 
urluckyday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Beautiful USA
Posts: 2,754
Current Game: Red Orchestra 2
10 year veteran! Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
I probably would have done better to use wording that didn't sound like propaganda, but it fits in this case. The public school system is the greatest exponent of socialism in this country because it indoctrinates children at a young age to the ideals of socialism by encouraging conformity while discouraging individuality. Conformist children are groomed for success while individuals are groomed for failure by being singled out, persecuted and harassed to the point of suicide (or murder) by the conformist students while the faculty either turns a blind eye or even joins in. Conformists are far easier to govern and control by the mere threat not fitting in, and I happen to regard them as something less than human.
You do make an interesting point...



If I die today, I'm happy how my life turned out
urluckyday is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 09:46 PM   #29
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,778
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
The nail that sticks up gets hammered down. But, frankly, conformism has less to do with any economic ideology and everything to do with social control for whomever is in charge.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 10:24 PM   #30
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
I probably would have done better to use wording that didn't sound like propaganda, but it fits in this case. The public school system is the greatest exponent of socialism in this country because it indoctrinates children at a young age to the ideals of socialism by encouraging conformity while discouraging individuality. Conformist children are groomed for success while individuals are groomed for failure by being singled out, persecuted and harassed to the point of suicide (or murder) by the conformist students while the faculty either turns a blind eye or even joins in. Conformists are far easier to govern and control by the mere threat not fitting in, and I happen to regard them as something less than human.

Go ahead and think that I'm throwing out "red herring labels for something (I) disagree with" if you wish. I know better because I've lived it and experienced it first-hand. Needless to say, I hate conformity with a purple passion.
If I agree with you, I'll be a conformist for conforming to your opinion. If I try to refute any of your above points, I'm a conformist because you know better. If I try to bring any sociology into this and explain conformity to you the way I understand it, I'll be a conformist for going to school. If I try to share any life experiences and relate, you'll just tell me I had it easy and in what ways I'm a conformist. If I try to understand your beliefs more in depth, you'll just explain to me how I need to be saved from my conformist ways and be an individual. If I try to explain myself, I have to step on the landmines of people you know who've been affected by conformity. If I do, I'm conformist. If I don't, I'm conformist.

I've been staring at your post for an hour and there is absolutely no way I can respond in any way that wont get you to hate me more
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 11:02 PM   #31
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
I had a good teacher.

But I don't hate you, Avery, or anyone else here. I hate the system and its effects; not its products. I am, after all, just as much a product of the system as you are, but I'm part of the opposite demographic.

EDIT: I see what you did there.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker

Last edited by Q; 04-19-2010 at 07:28 PM.
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 11:27 PM   #32
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Well, either here or in this thread (http://www.lucasforums.com/showthread.php?t=202944), could you at least explain how it could be fixed? I'm not really sure there is a way to stop conformity, but you may have some ideas.

But, as far as conformity goes, isn't that more of a problem with human nature and social norms instead of socialism? I was under the impression that socialism is supposedly the economic ideology, while straight communism deals with more of the social aspects.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-03-2010, 08:30 PM   #33
Ctrl Alt Del
Uncreative User
 
Ctrl Alt Del's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 3,814
Current Game: Dishonored
Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
I probably would have done better to use wording that didn't sound like propaganda, but it fits in this case. The public school system is the greatest exponent of socialism in this country because it indoctrinates children at a young age to the ideals of socialism by encouraging conformity while discouraging individuality. Conformist children are groomed for success while individuals are groomed for failure by being singled out, persecuted and harassed to the point of suicide (or murder) by the conformist students while the faculty either turns a blind eye or even joins in. Conformists are far easier to govern and control by the mere threat not fitting in, and I happen to regard them as something less than human.

Go ahead and think that I'm throwing out "red herring labels for something (I) disagree with" if you wish. I know better because I've lived it and experienced it first-hand. Needless to say, I hate conformity with a purple passion.
I think you got it backwards. Conformity is something that can only exist towards the ruling system. Regardless of what may have been said, we've got Capitalism running the show on the US, as it always have been. Now, I did never study on a North American public school so I can't check first-hand on your allegations regarding indocrination, but if one is led to think on the collective before thinking on himself, well that's excellent, isn't it?

Yes, off with the disguise, I'm by no means a sympathizer of Capitalism and most of it's damaging byproducts. By saying someone ought to think on others rather than just look out for himself and those that suround him and are in some fashion profitable to have around, does not equal to discouraging the belief on the individual's potential. In fact, there's a lot an individual can do in terms of self-improvement that'll only benefit society afterwards.

When one is born and educated in a place that demonizes differences - and we're talking especifically about the socioeconomic side - then there's little hope for individualism to actually blossom on him or her. I believe in the honest option of having an minimally unbiased choice betwixt what the general consensus is and what you wish to believe.


Inspiration

.Bioshock inspiration.
Ctrl Alt Del is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-03-2010, 09:12 PM   #34
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,778
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ctrl Alt Del View Post
.. if one is led to think on the collective before thinking on himself, well that's excellent, isn't it?
Depends on the nature of the "collective", unfortunately.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-03-2010, 11:23 PM   #35
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Yeah, it's really excellent when the idiotic collective gets convinced by some manipulative lunatic in a leadership position that thousands or even millions of people should be exterminated simply because they're somehow different from the members of the collective.

How many times has that happened in the past century? I can count half a dozen just off the top of my head. How many more times will it have to happen? Call me "selfish", but the collective can collectively kiss my ass.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-04-2010, 01:55 AM   #36
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
Yeah, it's really excellent when the idiotic collective gets convinced by some manipulative lunatic in a leadership position that thousands or even millions of people should be exterminated simply because they're somehow different from the members of the collective.

How many times has that happened in the past century? I can count half a dozen just off the top of my head. How many more times will it have to happen? Call me "selfish", but the collective can collectively kiss my ass.
Warning: Going to abuse a metaphor this entire post.

I think its more of a love/hate thing. I mean, without a "collective" I doubt society would hold together very well. A country of individuals sounds... difficult to manage. A collective can vote, create law and "order" or sorts, come together to form enforcement, business, parties, etc.

The side effect of this is that individuality becomes a minority and, strictly and non-offensively speaking, almost like an odd cog in the machine. The cog can stray off the pattern and cause the machine to do something new, or it can strip gears and drag other cogs into its basement and eat them.

But, cogs really all flow and spin together, stripped or skewed off regardless. Even if you and I view ourselves as "individuals" or "different", we're still a cog in the end. We conformed to language, customs, traditions, beliefs, etc of our machine. If your catholic upbringing was against the spin of your cog, you then spin the other way, moving other cogs in the process.

Our parties, religions, viewpoints, etc all seem to form working "collectives" of cogs, working together to at least some degree through the, well, centrist cogs I guess.

I think my point is, an "individual" cog on the side of the machine that just runs by itself is effectively doing nothing at all. It is, in a way, just a waste of energy. This cog, in reality, could only really be approximated to a non-English speaking... I dunno, asian man being dropped in the middle of new york with no idea of customs, language, ect of the country. He's a cog that sort of works, but at the moment has nothing else to grip onto to make him a functioning part of the system. This may also apply in some fashion to anarchists or, well, straight criminals although, while they strip some gears they are probably more apart in moving the machine than the "individual" on the side.

The concept of an "individual" is hard for me to define. While you or myself may call ourselves individuals, me may just be cogs in the middle, or off to the side working while the main gears and cylinders work away. Maybe its gears that didn't hook in right with the collective heart and were relegated to other points, etc. I dunno.

In thinking so, the "collective" seems to be, in many ways, just a perspective issue. Cogs at the bottom look up and see a mountain of cogs, and those at the top look down and see and sea of cogs. The Republicans see an overwhelming and destructive sea of cogs, while the Democrats see a raging volcanic mountain of cogs. Those in the perceived middle see both, and those to the side, or perceived side, watch the rest of the cogs work merrily.

What you may see as a collective, they may consider themselves a bunch of individuals doing their part. Are you conservative/liberal? Do you vote conservative/liberal? Well, you may see yourself as an individual, but chances are you're still spinning with the cogs all around you but you just don't care to bother with who you're spinning with.

Point is, the machine is there and we're mostly all apart of it.

Sometimes one shifts drastically and causes a bunch to spin backwards with it. While, say, Germany got a bunch to spin with the Nazi party, there were still a great deal that didn't exactly approve. Maybe it is fear that keeps them quiet, honor, or something else. Slowly, more cogs went with the changer and those that didn't turn got stripped and thus major parts of the machine either stop working, or are forcible turned.

Who's "collective" can kiss your ass is up for question. As Toten says, it entirely depends on the nature. While I bet you'd take offense to it, you probably fit into more of an anarchistic collective branch of the machine. That, or the "libertarian" collective. Take your pick. You belong somewhere because you aren't an Asian man with no knowledge of America's language, customs, etc.

While the idea of some leader coming forth and moving a collective absolutely disgusts you, it again may come down to perspective. You're a hill of cogs watching another hill of cogs saying "[insert here]". But, what if someone, or a group, were to come forth with the legitimate idea of throwing power back to the people, dissolving most of the government, and, well, [insert your belief here].

Would you follow that "party", or those cogs? Would you follow Jefferson's influential cog on government?

Or, do you truly believe you are just a cog that sits outside the rest of the machine looking on? In all honesty, what use are you then? Are you not just then a cog that, well, wastes space and energy on the machine? While you would indeed be sticking it to the collective, what use are you?

I don't believe that. I believe you fit in somewhere because we're talking. But, by fitting in somewhere, I also believe that, under the right circumstances, either a major cog could move you by mechanics, or maybe you'd even be one of those major cogs. I don't know.

Essentially what I'm saying is I don't see how a "collective" can be pointed out as a whole. You can look from your spot and see a horizon of cogs, but you're still apart of the machine no matter how rusty you try to get.

I've talked to you. I have a basic understanding of a lot of your beliefs, and I find it hard to imagine that you would refuse a following that built itself upon your beliefs. If not that, then you're at least apart of some part of the machine trying to affect the collective. Essentially, by sticking it to them and resisting you're trying to move the collective itself and effectively becoming the "manipulative lunatic" that changes course.

I'm being brutally honest here with my opinion, but the only way you're going to be an "individual" is if you move out to a lone island somewhere or fall off and die. Everywhere else you're still apart of some machine, and some collective.

Conformity is human nature. How our social dynamics work. No matter what, you're going to conform to something somewhere. Whether that be "anarchy", rebellion, etc they are all still stances and pieces especially in a society as big as ours.

In this sense, "non-conformity", "individualism", "anarchy" may all be illusions and dreams just as elaborate and far fetched as communism. While some cogs stick, rust, sheer, pop out, the machine often keeps running, compensating for the lost cog. Its why "communism" may, in the end, just be a utopia lie since it would imply a machine that never rusts, never stutters, never changes. An movable god. But, a true "individual" cog just spins, connecting to nothing, changing nothing, wasting space, time, and energy until it finds it niche and runs with the rest.

Personally, I think you run with the rest by some capacity. We all do. You're not posting porn, speaking in Japanese, and generally doing everything in your power to ruin this forum or doing anything in your power to ruin every cog here so, in some capacity, you're at least moving, even if grudgingly, along with this forum's collective.

Even if a cog is skewed, running slow or fast, etc, the machine can still compensate and, in doing so, may change many parts of it. It is why mutations, individuals, etc are important for the function and "evolution" of the machine... but, if changing, even by their own unique factor... they're still connection, spinning with others, and, in the end, still very much apart of the mass "collective", or the "machine".

This isn't a "side effect" of capitalism, socialism, schools, business, etc. Calling it a "side effect" seems to almost be a denial of the existence and function of any society, no matter how small. If anything, it is a "side effect" of the meeting and communication of 2 or more humans. They can either go at it and both die like savages, alone, or they can communicate and find common ground on something as simple as being a fan of some fashion of Star Wars. Once that connection is made, conformation begins. Boundaries are made between likes and dislikes. Rules, and such are made and then you have the foundation of a society, even if only 2 people. And, possibly, even if it is only 1 person that person still "conforms" in some fashion to the world around him, finding boundaries, limits, etc to animals, trees, weather, etc.

In summary, I believe a true "individual" in society exists about as much as absolute true communism.

Last edited by True_Avery; 03-04-2010 at 02:10 AM.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-19-2010, 07:43 PM   #37
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
^Hm, I'd be willing to bet that I could sum up that entire post's worth of reverse psychology in three words:

"Resistance is futile."



"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-19-2010, 08:26 PM   #38
Salzella
areiK
 
Salzella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,135
Current Game: Portal, Half-Life 2.
Why do you equate socialism with loss of freedom? economic big state/small state issues are very different to ideas of conformity and 'freedom' (a word i don't like using). Also, do you consider yourself an anarchist? the things you say sound like anarchist ideas but you're very cynical about it if they are. maybe they're not, maybe i'm misinterpreting. also, do you consider socialism a bad thing compared to neoliberalism? if you do, then i would say that it's an odd thing to take that from socialism and capitalism, the former emphasising the common good whilst maintaining individual freedom, and the latter being individual concerns at the expense of the common good which always strikes me as frankly incredibly selfish.
Salzella is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-19-2010, 10:07 PM   #39
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,778
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Quote:
if you do, then i would say that it's an odd thing to take that from socialism and capitalism, the former emphasising the common good whilst maintaining individual freedom, and the latter being individual concerns at the expense of the common good which always strikes me as frankly incredibly selfish.
Seems a bit naive. Neither capitalism nor socialism really have anything to do with the common good. Socialism puts the "burden" of charity on govt (and ultimately the private sector via heavy taxation), whilst capitalism largely leaves it to individuals to decide. I'd say that the way both are practiced currently could be more or less described as such: capitalism is about equality of opportunity and socialism about equality (NOT quality, mind you) of outcome. This is even more pronounced in "communist" nations, where everyone that's not important (pretty much entire populations) has crappy quality of life. I'm thinking it's equally selfish of one to expect govt to pick up the tab for your miserable existence and does nothing to foster personal responsibility.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 04-19-2010, 10:28 PM   #40
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salzella View Post
Why do you equate socialism with loss of freedom?
Because, in a nutshell it is the taking, by force, of money from people who've earned it and then giving it to those who haven't. It's slavery.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salzella
economic big state/small state issues are very different to ideas of conformity
They go hand in hand as far as I'm concerned. Conformists are far easier to deceive, oppress and enslave. It is easier to convince conformists that they aren't really slaves when, in fact, they are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salzella
and 'freedom' (a word i don't like using).
Why not? I know that it's become clichéd and perhaps even unfashionable, but I wasn't aware that it had become a dirty word.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salzella
Also, do you consider yourself an anarchist?
No. I'm well aware of the need for the rule of law. The problem is that the law has been corrupted to the point that we are now under the rule of an oligarchy of sorts, which is precisely what the founding fathers wanted to avoid when they wrote the constitution and its amendments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salzella
the things you say sound like anarchist ideas but you're very cynical about it if they are. maybe they're not, maybe i'm misinterpreting.
Explained above, and, yes, I'm very cynical, especially in certain situations. Who isn't at my age?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salzella
also, do you consider socialism a bad thing compared to neoliberalism? if you do, then i would say that it's an odd thing to take that from socialism and capitalism, the former emphasising the common good whilst maintaining individual freedom,
When and where has it ever managed to do that? I'm fairly certain that socialism sacrifices individual freedom on the altar of "the common good".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salzella
and the latter being individual concerns at the expense of the common good which always strikes me as frankly incredibly selfish.
I'm sure that's what you've been taught. It is my belief that a system designed around the way people actually are here in reality is going to work better than a system that forces people to conform to an ideal and destroys the people who can't or won't. Or at least it will as long as the government doesn't try to sabotage it for its own ends. Yes, people should give more, but they should be encouraged to do so voluntarily, and not at gunpoint. Voluntary altruism is charity. Involuntary altruism is slavery. I'd rather live in a society that gives me a choice, be it charitable or selfish.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > Knights of the Old Republic > Community > Kavar's Corner > Socialism Questions

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.