lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar

Thread: Ubisoft plans to require constant net connection just to play their games
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 02-20-2010, 06:25 PM   #41
Lynk Former
internet hate machine
 
Lynk Former's Avatar
 
Status: Administrator
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,974
10 year veteran! The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer LF Jester 
I remember a time when Ubisoft was seen as "the good guy" and EA was "the bad guy"... the roles have kind of reversed since then.

Lynk Former is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-20-2010, 07:46 PM   #42
Hypnotiq
Rookie
 
Hypnotiq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 19
I still see EA as bad guys, in fact when Bioware and EA announced their partnership I almost cried, literally.

That being said, it is true, Ubisoft is now beginning to rival EA and in some aspects actually pass EA in terms of pissing off gamers. With retarded DRM moves like this I think it's safe to say soon they will pass EA for most retarded game comapny.


“Evil will always triumph over good because good is dumb.”
Dark Helmet, Space Balls
Hypnotiq is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-20-2010, 08:46 PM   #43
jrrtoken
Senior Member
 
jrrtoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,995
Every publisher is inherently evil; some are simply less. CD Projekt is probably the first to come to mind that actually tries to develop and maintain a transparent and benevolent relationship with the fans; the same could also be said about Atlus, and maybe even Nintendo, Sega, or Valve.

That being said, they all want your money, but the ones that truly have finesse are the ones that play nice. That excludes EA, Activision, Ubisoft, Atari, 2K Games - and, our favorite - LucasArts; we hate love them the most.
jrrtoken is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-21-2010, 01:29 AM   #44
Lynk Former
internet hate machine
 
Lynk Former's Avatar
 
Status: Administrator
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,974
10 year veteran! The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer LF Jester 
EA is still evil, but they've been releasing a lot of good games recently... plus did the buyout of BioWare really effect things for us? Their games are still awesome... All I know is that EA was responsible for Dead Space... and Dead Space is awesome.

I have never bought any EA games in my entire life until I bought The Godfather: Blackhand Edition for Wii and Dead Space for 360... and since then I've bought more titles from EA. They were a publisher I tried to ignore as best I could, and in the past I could do that pretty easily... but nowadays you can't ignore EA... they're releasing some damn good games...

Lynk Former is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-21-2010, 05:49 AM   #45
Astrotoy7
A Face from The Past
 
Astrotoy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,284
Notable contributor Helpful! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member 
Well said Lynktron

Its pretty easy for folks to say they hate EA if they aren't interested in any games that they make. Now that EA has moved out of simply making games(like their sports titles) and branched out into publishing and distribution at a global scale, they're becoming increasingly inescapable. Between EA, Ubi and Blizzard(and their subsidiaries) you are covering a heck of a lot of what is on the market.

For example, EAD(EA Distribution) is now responsible for Lucasarts and Square Enix distribution in US and Asia Pacific, so if you want to play TOR or Final Fantasy XIII, you *will be* putting some money in EA's pocket.

If someone fancies themselves as a bit of a Cyber-Che Guevara, and can't deal with that, then they can always play the awesome flash game DISCO BOWLING

That being said, this whole DRM thing with ubi had pi**ed on AC2onPC's parade in fabulous fashion. A lot of people with healthy broadband and bandwidth have been egged onto wait for a nefarious copy rather than submit to ubisoft's over compensating for the mess up that happened with AC1onPC

mtfbwya


Asinus asinum fricat

Last edited by Astrotoy7; 02-21-2010 at 05:54 AM.
Astrotoy7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-21-2010, 09:09 AM   #46
Drunkside
Satan´s little helper
 
Drunkside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The land of snow and sorrow
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mav View Post
Not like it wont be cracked anyway.
Exactly. And bs like this is going to drive even those who actually buy games nowadays like me to the world of piracy, its a goddamn kick in the face for honest folk. This is the worst decicion ever by ubisoft, and could actually be their last as well...


Saivo´s New demo, A Cruel Northern Land is out! Listen to it on our mikseri.net bandpage.

http://www.mikseri.net/artists/?id=117610

Last edited by Drunkside; 02-21-2010 at 09:21 AM.
Drunkside is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-22-2010, 07:47 AM   #47
JesusIsGonnaOwnSatan
ANTA BAKAAA?!
 
JesusIsGonnaOwnSatan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Over the bridge from Australia
Posts: 1,213



...



I'm basically of the same opinion as Jae. I buy all my games because i like supporting the devs. I wanted to buy Assassin's Creed, but now im not so sure ill bother with the game... if i get 1, then i'll want to get 2. And i don't want this drm headache that comes with it.



mfw I read the Revan novel

it is not a cry of joy.
JesusIsGonnaOwnSatan is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-24-2010, 12:07 PM   #48
Ctrl Alt Del
Uncreative User
 
Ctrl Alt Del's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 3,814
Current Game: Dishonored
Forum Veteran 
That's an obvious inconvinience in so many levels. For instance, there are several PCs at home, and all of them share a single internet connection. The purpose of this arrangement is that no one will have to wait to use a terminal when another person is using it; they can just go and use another one. Needless to say this defeats this purpose, since I won't be able to play if the internet is already in use.


Inspiration

.Bioshock inspiration.
Ctrl Alt Del is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 04:12 AM   #49
Darth Avlectus
Your point?
 
Darth Avlectus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Attack on Titan
Posts: 4,254
Current Game: Soul Calibur 5
Ubisoft made "no more heroes" which to me looks like a cheap ripoff of Air Gear anime mixed with a horribly cliche ripping off of Star Wars.

Also, I just love how copyright is beginning to jeopardize privacy as a concept. This is the future of gaming. I already open equipment and see part numbers that cannot be looked up in a database like a normal integrated circuit like a "4066" IC or a "74HC688" IC. Proprietary parts.

Whadya bet soon for OEM replacements of older consoles (like NES, atari, sega), it will now have some kind of smart meter in it and require an internet connection just to play? I wouldn't put it out of the realm.


Year 2064: You are now required as a part of all contracts, to submit to a productivity schedule scaled hour-to-hour, and must submit to a check at an arbitrary party's sole discretion with or without sufficient prior warning.

( I imagine the contracts' disclaimers would read something like: )

These third parties may, in their sole discretion, exercise correctional disciplinary action to correct aberrant behavior deemed but not limited to the following categories: unproductive, counter productive, unhealthy, destructive, wasteful, obscene, indecent, dangerous [to any entities whatsoever], libelous, slanderous, derogatory, defaming, facilitating of violent tendencies, incitement to assembly of any and every kind arising from and out of use of said software and services purchased without prior written consent, deceitful, unsanitary, or in any other way considered to be "straying" from an individual's productivity schedule.

Neither third parties, nor service providers for gaming services originating this contract shall be held liable in the event that an error in evaluation has occurred, nor for any caused result in any way;shape;form related to errors made in said evaluations including but not limited to: bodily harm or death caused by immolation, police brutality, disembowelment, impaling, zombificaiton, disintegration, vehicular assault, freezing, electrocution, chemical poison, and possession.

Sign on the line with print below:

Customer signature:
______________________

Customer Print:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Have a nice day!
Darth Avlectus is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 05:57 AM   #50
Lynk Former
internet hate machine
 
Lynk Former's Avatar
 
Status: Administrator
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,974
10 year veteran! The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer LF Jester 
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA:SWcity View Post
Ubisoft made "no more heroes" which to me looks like a cheap ripoff of Air Gear anime mixed with a horribly cliche ripping off of Star Wars.
GTA... I've been meaning to tell you this directly for a long time now, but you have absolutely no idea what the hell you're talking about.

Ubisoft DID NOT make No More Heroes, they were just the US distributor for the game. Grasshopper Manufacturer led by Goichi Suda made No More Heroes. And if you actually knew anything about the game you'd know that it's about a gaming/anime/sci fi geek who becomes an assassin. A hell of a lot of gaming references, a hell of a lot of anime references and a hell of a lot of sci-fi references. All of these factors were put into the game for the purpose of making fun of it all in a parody format.

Lynk Former is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 07:19 AM   #51
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,912
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ctrl Alt Del View Post
That's an obvious inconvinience in so many levels. For instance, there are several PCs at home, and all of them share a single internet connection.
We have a single net connection at our house, and we're able to all log in to Guild Wars at the same time, and yesterday my son and I played STO together on the same connection, so it is possible. However, it requires multiple copies of the game to play it, which may be yet another reason why Ubisoft did this.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 10:51 AM   #52
ChAiNz.2da
Brony 4 Life. Yo.
 
ChAiNz.2da's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tennessee (USA)
Posts: 6,845
Current Game: Minecraft MP: PynCraft|Tekkit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Onasi View Post
We have a single net connection at our house, and we're able to all log in to Guild Wars at the same time, and yesterday my son and I played STO together on the same connection, so it is possible. However, it requires multiple copies of the game to play it, which may be yet another reason why Ubisoft did this.
I'm assuming broadband (cable/dsl) and/or router? Same here with my home network.

Dial-up would be an entirely different story.. of course, so would trying to game on such a connection.. hehehe

------

as for Ubisoft's idea.. it's a bit preposterous imo. Not everyone has access to broadband, or the finances to maintain one. Seems to me that cutting off a potential line of $$ is nothing short of shooting yourself in the foot. It isn't exactly the right kind of economy to be choosy about who your customers are.

Seems to be begging for people to crack it honestly

Though not the same situation, you'd think Ubisoft would've taken note of the fiasco that happened with BioShock's initial release and the entire "activate online & then, only so many times". Companies need to realize that strangle-holding options are only going to cause the pitchforks & torches to start coming out.


"Eagles May Soar, But Weasels Don't Get Sucked Into Jet Engines"


| Mods (FF) (DS) | Folding | SWK.com | FB: (LF) (Me) | Steam | The Herd |
ChAiNz.2da is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-25-2010, 04:01 PM   #53
TSR
Hoist the colours!
 
TSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, England, UK
Posts: 2,777
Current Game: Rift
Forum Veteran LF Jester Helpful! 
Come on, TSR, say something without dropping yourself in the s**t for once...

Here goes.

I can see the theory behind the lunacy, barely, and it is even more "facepalm-able" in the way they intend to execute it. This seems to be more of a publicity stunt to attempt to become some sort of Piracy fighting "front", or "celebrity" if you will. And as we should all be aware, so called celebrities often do very little to be heralded, so it seems to fit perfectly.

Onto the concept, the idea that you must maintain an internet connection is a double edged sword. While alot of people tend to have such connections nowadays (And i look to all the mmo'ers), there is still a vast amount of people who's only access to the internet and other online related things is probably their local library. There are still many villages/Hamlets in England that are not hooked up yet, and probably even more that are using the same infrastructure as when phone lines were initially installed, so merely getting a reliable connection is a challenge.

Reliability in England as far as i know, seems to be concentrated to the major cities, while the rest of the county all contend with eachother every evening waiting for 10 minutes for Facebook to load so they can see what people were doing yesterday. It is places like these that they are going to alienate, and from my limited consumer expertise, i can only assume that it is in said places that a major percentage of "offline" games are sold.

In short- A publicity stunt that has had the same thought applied to it as we did when we let you damm Americans take Hugh Laurie.


British By Birth. English By The Grace Of God

Dulce et Decorum Est Pro Patria Mori
Let Mercy Come
TSR is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 09:39 AM   #54
Liverandbacon
I'm only worth a piano?
 
Liverandbacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 651
Forum Veteran LF Jester Folder extraordinaire 
I was having a hard time deciding what upcoming games I'm planning to buy, and which to skip. Ubisoft just made it easier for me.

I wonder if Ubisoft realizes that they've just murdered laptop gaming (for their games), which is pretty common on commuter trains where there is obviously no internet access.



--Too Dumb to Quit--
Liverandbacon is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 10:23 AM   #55
swphreak
My cabbages!!!
 
swphreak's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,510
10 year veteran! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
The thing that really bugs me about this is that it will not work. Pirates will crack it, and nothing will have changed except that Ubisoft might lose legitimate customers because of the restrictions.

I eagerly await the launch day howlings and whining that people's games aren't working because Ubi's servers aren't up to the task and are getting DDOS'd by everyone.
swphreak is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 07:03 PM   #56
Astor
It's Thornhill!
 
Astor's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Warwickshire, UK
Posts: 3,631
Current Game: The Old Republic
LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liverandbacon View Post
I was having a hard time deciding what upcoming games I'm planning to buy, and which to skip. Ubisoft just made it easier for me.

I wonder if Ubisoft realizes that they've just murdered laptop gaming (for their games), which is pretty common on commuter trains where there is obviously no internet access.
They're not just murdering laptop gaming. This draconian DRM policy also has the potential to kill off the Submarine sim market - Ubisoft's Silent Hunter series has been the big daddy in those waters for a long time - and many veterans (it was about 80% last time I checked, but i'm not too active in that community much more) of the community have refused to play along.

Well, I say 'kill' - which isn't true considering the Sub community is pretty active with both SH3 and 4, and backed up by a strong modding scene, but it'd be sad to see a series of excellent games end because of Ubisoft's stupidity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StarWarsPhreak View Post
I eagerly await the launch day howlings and whining that people's games aren't working because Ubi's servers aren't up to the task and are getting DDOS'd by everyone.
No doubt Ubisoft will moan that they hadn't anticipated such high demand, and will increase their server capacity or some nonsense. I can't see them abandoning their scheme so rapidly. Personally, I give it three months.






Astor is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 07:18 PM   #57
Tobias Reiper
Spah creepin' around here
 
Tobias Reiper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Right behind you.
Posts: 396
Current Game: Various Games.
LucasCast staff 
Oh, goody goody.
"Hey, when your internet gets shut off, do you want to play some games to pass the time until you can afford it?"
"Yea."
"WELL THAT'S TOO ****IN BAD, NOW GO OUTSIDE!"


"There is no way to be better than everyone else, but being kind and having a sense of humor certainly helps." -Me, my quote on life.
Tobias Reiper is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 10:03 PM   #58
Ctrl Alt Del
Uncreative User
 
Ctrl Alt Del's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 3,814
Current Game: Dishonored
Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Onasi View Post
We have a single net connection at our house, and we're able to all log in to Guild Wars at the same time, and yesterday my son and I played STO together on the same connection, so it is possible. However, it requires multiple copies of the game to play it, which may be yet another reason why Ubisoft did this.
We have broadband here, supposedly. And it used to be like that too. But now I think the company just cut that option off.


Inspiration

.Bioshock inspiration.
Ctrl Alt Del is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-04-2010, 12:07 AM   #59
swphreak
My cabbages!!!
 
swphreak's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,510
10 year veteran! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
It's rumored the DRM has already been cracked.
swphreak is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-04-2010, 12:55 AM   #60
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Excellent.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-08-2010, 12:01 PM   #61
Prime
Am I a truck or robot?
 
Prime's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cybertron
Posts: 12,345
Current Game: Skyrim, Macross PS2
10 year veteran! LF Jester Veteran Modder Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by StarWarsPhreak View Post
I eagerly await the launch day howlings and whining that people's games aren't working because Ubi's servers aren't up to the task
That didn't take long.

http://www.gossipgamers.com/ubisoft-...rvers-go-down/

http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/t...7481010838/p/1

Prime is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-08-2010, 06:05 PM   #62
Mav
8-Bit Code Monkey
 
Mav's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: A House
Posts: 4,043
Current Game: SWTOR
^^Yeh Ubi failed this weekend, quite hysterically.


"Women are like sunsets… they’re beautiful, but there will be a different one tomorrow." - Gilder
Mav is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-08-2010, 06:55 PM   #63
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,912
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
Yep, and Ubisoft is apparently alternating between the 'it's a DDOS attack' and 'due to exceptional demand, some people may have trouble logging in'.

What a surprise. I think I'll have heart attack and die from that surprise. /Iago the parrot


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-08-2010, 11:50 PM   #64
ForeverNight
nrgurt researcher
 
ForeverNight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 1,204
Current Game: q2
I've read about 3 pages of it, and it's very funny how everybody is saying that 'uhm, yea, you're DRM sucks.' and then the Ubi mods are going 'Well, duhr, post your system specs because that's where the issue is!' Followed by the party line... God, I haven't even played the first one and this pisses me off so badly..... Why do I have to have morals and not fire up ISOHunt and d/l it?!

Damn morals.


ForeverNight is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 03:07 AM   #65
Astrotoy7
A Face from The Past
 
Astrotoy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,284
Notable contributor Helpful! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member 
I bought the game and am playing without the 'DRM dropout danger' with a no-dvd patch.

I do not see anything in the documentation provided that says it is illegal for me to do this - though I am surely waivering support options if something weird happens from a software perspective.

[IMHO] Those who want to properly protest ubi corporate's decisions should best do so by giving the game a miss entirely, or until(or if) the DRM is lifted. If you seek a pirated copy, you are harming the pc gaming community just as much as ubi's idiotic decisions are.

For a game I plan to spend hours on and am really enjoying, I personally can't bring myself to go out and leech a copy - it would be unfair to the folks that put a lot of effort into the game. These people don't have any say over how their work is being represented in this instance.

Quite frankly, if it weren't for the piraters leaking AC1 in the first instance, this **** may not have happpenned to this game

All in all, it's a bit of a mess for everyone concerned, both ubi and the pc gaming community.

I really love the game I must say, and looks and plays great if you have some decent kit.

mtfbwya


Asinus asinum fricat
Astrotoy7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 03:25 AM   #66
The Seeker
Senior Member
 
The Seeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,324
The war is between the companies and the pirates. The rest of us are the one's caught in the middle and the only ones that either side is truly harming. Back in the day, I remember being passionate enough about gaming to just take whatever the publisher shells out and work around the inconvenience. These days, I'm content to truly boycott. Not say I'll boycott then break down. Not pirate the game to "show the developers what's what" but truly not partake in their product at all.

That's really the only way to get through to them. Not to steal from them which just exacerbates the problem, but to deprive them of their money; my money in any form. That's just me though, but I live under the rule that changing the world is impossible. I can only change myself. If more people did that rather than resorting to piracy, we'd see a decline in draconian DRM policies.


And Shepherds we shall be
For thee, my Lord, for thee.
Power hath descended forth from Thy hand
Our feet may swiftly carry out Thy commands.
So we shall flow a river forth to Thee
And teeming with souls shall it ever be.
In Nomeni Patri Et Fili Spiritus Sancti.

OMG Jedi Knight 4!!!
The Seeker is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 04:38 AM   #67
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
To pose an opposite opinion, I think pirating may do as much to add data to possible sales as it would to hurt them.

One way to look at it is to say that pirating harms the community by causing DRM.

I pose the idea that DRM creates pirates in a form of morally questionable boycotting, and is closer the the heart source of what is harming the community.

DRM shows a definite distrust in the consumer. Even if it is right, it still shows it. It is a terrible PR problem. It shows distrust to gamers of all ages and an attitude of "we'll harm as many people as possible if it means sales". True or not, that is what it can translate to. Why do you think Steam and Valve have so much support, yet one of the best DRM systems available? Because, even though there is DRM, Valve updates their games, upgrades their games, and throws their community bones as often as possible. They share a sense of humor with the community, and at least give the illusion they care.

Why?

Gabe Newell gave an address to the gaming community years ago that increased DRM only hurts game sales and shows distrust and showed data of Steams own systems on how their sales were affected on what they did. It consistently showed that when they threw the community a free bone, their sales grew incredibly. He told them that treating the consumer like, well, a faceless, mindless sack of money to be bought would only hurt them in the end. Half-life games remain some of the less torrented games because of Steams DRM, but maintain health sales while torrenting has risen to incredible levels over the years with other games, especially on games with DRM. Nobody listened to him. They heard "you all need better DRM", and not "you need to trust and listen to your customers".

Gabe's main point was this: Pirates are not criminals. They are potential customers that you are losing. When you stop seeing them as criminals and instead as someone to win over, you'll make money and, frankly, have as much support as Valve does. Games with heavy DRM make torrenting records. The problem is exacerbated by a distinct distrust and mean spirited attitude towards fans and consumers. If anything, pirating is the big "f*** you" to the publisher. A number that says "this is the money you could of made, but now aren't".

A toaster that you threw out and then had pictures conveniently posted to you outlining how much toast you could of had if you respected the toaster. I say this because I can guarantee you sales would go up and pirating down if these games were just released and ADVERTISED as not having DRM. Because, truly, it is sad that the first thing asked about an upcoming game is "how much DRM will there be"? Because it is sad to look on the forum and see people unable to play a game they bought and actually having the balls to tell developers, on their own forum, that they are just going to go ahead and pirate the game.

I base this idea not on stealing vs buying, but on the age old capitalistic idea that the consumer knows best. Do not see Piratebay as a criminal haven, but as another company run like any other. This then becomes Ubisoft vs PirateBay or, rather, Target Vs. Wal-Mart. If Target begins to put huge, hulking tags on their shirt that remain there at all times and will burst into flames if the shirt is not used as intended... guess what? People will then buy the shirt at Wal-Mart. PirateBay offers the same product without the ball and chain with just as much, if not sometimes, more functionality. As a business, PirateBay is making more sales by the day because the Ubisoft consumer is unhappy.

The customer knows best, and if DRM is a reflection of customer opinion then customer opinion is this: The consumer wants their product when they buy it with as little restriction as possible.

With two real businesses, if this data came back to them then they would do what was in their power to copy or improve upon the idea and buy customers back. It is how a business is run, and how the top businesses remain.

Ubisoft and all these companies problem is that they do not view PirateBay as a competitor. They view them as a criminal organization and the pirates not as potential customers but as lost causes.

For this mindset alone, they deserve to be put out of business by the more profitable PirateBay. That is capitalism, and that is how things work.

Valve realized this years ago. This is why they have a gaming distributor system, are 1# with indie developers, and have the largest consistent non-mmo gaming community ever.

In summary: Bad DRM drives piracy, not the other way around. This is consumer opinion through the filter of capitalism at work. Quite frankly, you wouldn't call people who turn from Target to Wal-Mart criminals if Target put bombs on shirts that stayed on their shirts after market and would explode if they were not connected by wireless to the internet at all times.

View PirateBay as another company and pirates as other consumers and not criminals, and Ubisoft's justification suddenly looks a lot less thought out. In any other business this would be seen as anything from a deliberate handicap to economic suicide.

Last edited by True_Avery; 03-09-2010 at 09:35 AM.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 04:52 AM   #68
Lynk Former
internet hate machine
 
Lynk Former's Avatar
 
Status: Administrator
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,974
10 year veteran! The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer LF Jester 
The basic premise is, if business is good, you still shouldn't do anything that may piss off your customers. The only reason business is good is because the customers are happy with you. If they're not happy, then you're not going to have as many customers as you used to.... then business won't be so good...

Lynk Former is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 07:40 AM   #69
igyman
Tension!
 
igyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: White City
Posts: 3,408
Current Game: Trine Enchanted Edition (PC)
Forum Veteran Helpful! Contest winner - Fan Fiction 
Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
To pose an opposite opinion, I think pirating may do as much to add data to possible sales as it would to hurt them.

I pose the idea that DRM creates pirates in a form of morally questionable boycotting, and is closer the the heart source of what is harming the community.
Precisely. I'd just like to add (knowing some people who use pirated software) that the presence of DRM, while very important, is not the only reason for not buying an original copy. Part of the problem is the very high price of software.

If we talk about games only, when you compare most of today's games length/price/replayability/other you might conclude that a lot of them aren't worth the $30, $40 or even $60 you gave for them. That doesn't mean you wouldn't be willing to pay for a game, but simply that you aren't willing to give that amount of money for it.
The solution right now is to simply wait a year or two until the price drops, but most gamers aren't that patient and they'd rather pirate a game to play it now and perhaps eventually buy it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
Gabe's main point was this: Pirates are not criminals. They are potential customers that you are losing. When you stop seeing them as criminals and instead as someone to win over, you'll make money and, frankly, have as much support as Valve does. Games with heavy DRM make torrenting records. The problem is exacerbated by a distinct distrust and mean spirited attitude towards fans and consumers. If anything, pirating is the big "f*** you" to the publisher. A number that says "this is the money you could of made, but now aren't".
I think you nailed the point with this one. Like I said, people are willing to pay, but they want to be completely sure they'll get their money's worth.

igyman is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 09:13 AM   #70
JediAthos
Senior Member
 
JediAthos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,438
Current Game: Defiance
Forum Veteran Contest winner - Fan Fiction 
Avery I agree with your point completely. The same could be be said for the record and movie industries as well.

Frankly, I would think by now that Ubisoft has to realize they've dropped the ball on this one. I suppose that maybe they still think they can bounce back and maintain their ridiculous system, but someone, somewhere within the company has to be thinking "damn maybe we shouldn't have done this."


"You'll find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view."

JediAthos is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 09:38 AM   #71
Astrotoy7
A Face from The Past
 
Astrotoy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,284
Notable contributor Helpful! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member 
Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
In summary: Bad DRM drives piracy, not the other way around.
Oh cmon...it's not that single faceted! Human nature drives piracy. Heavy handed DRM can indeed goad the pirates along - as in this case.

The "why pay for it if I can get it for free(and dont get caught)" is at the crux of a lot piracy.

It verges on the point of ridiculous when games/apps that are available as budget titles are still available for leeching. Even if it costs $5, there is still someone out there who wont want to pay $5 for it!

There are software companies that go nowhere near any type of DRM implementation that have their stuff hacked and spread around on torrents. The demand for their product is the driving factor for their appearance on p2p sites.

As far as ubi are concerned, the cause is quite clear - the one month early leak of the pc dvd of Assassins Creed 1 burnt them badly. They weren't targeted because of their DRM back then - it was pirates/p2p folk wanting to get in on a game that everyone was so excited about following its console success.

The once 'good guys' of the publishing world were dealt a low blow by pirates, and this this flawed solution was the only way they could think of that will fix it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avery
The problem is exacerbated by a distinct distrust and mean spirited attitude towards fans and consumers. If anything, pirating is the big "f*** you" to the publisher.
It is also a massive f*** you to the people who worked on the game. If a title makes less money, the same talented people will not get together to make a pretty sequel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynky
The basic premise is, if business is good, you still shouldn't do anything that may piss off your customers. The only reason business is good is because the customers are happy with you. If they're not happy, then you're not going to have as many customers as you used to.... then business won't be so good...
One can imagine ubi had some number crunchers run the digits on projected impact on sales of their new DRM, and were still pleased enough with the profit to go through with it - mostly riding on the success of AC1 and the glowing reports AC2 has received on the console. If Ubi does loosen the DRM restrictions, it could be just as much due to the fact that their infrastructure couldn't deliver what they were promising (which seems to be the case so far).

One thing that is clear - whatever happens with this over the next few weeks/months could be hugely influential on policies adopted on other games and by other publishers. You can bet EA is watching with great interest.

mtfbwya


Asinus asinum fricat

Last edited by Astrotoy7; 03-09-2010 at 09:53 AM.
Astrotoy7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 10:17 AM   #72
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,912
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
I would like to see game companies do what iTunes has done for music. Make it cheap enough that people are willing to buy from you (an entire album for the cost of a cup of Starbuck's fancy coffee isn't bad), make it incredibly easy and fast to download, add features like playlists and all the other bells and whistles iTunes has (or whatever mp3 Player system you use), and make it secure. I buy music from iTunes because it's cheap there, the site is secure--I'm not going to get a virus from iTunes like I might from a torrent--and I'm not going to get harassed by RIAA.

Steam and Direct2Drive have it right. I recently d/l'd a digital copy of Kotor and Psychonauts from Steam and a VtMB copy from D2D. Why? For VtMB, it was because I was away from home at a conference, and I'd forgotten my game at home. Internet access was blocked in the conference hall itself, so I couldn't play LOTRO. The games were cheap (I got Psychonauts on the $2 sale), and it's a good backup for when my game discs do die. Trying to find a hard copy of VtMB and Kotor is becoming increasingly difficult. If my hard drive craps out, I can d/l another copy at no charge. I viewed it as game insurance.

If the devs went to the Steam/D2D versions, or had their own d/l system without draconian DRM, and lowered the prices on the game, I think they'd make more money and see less pirating. The challenge is to make it so attractive to buy it legally that more people want to go to the dev's site (or store, or Steam or other legal outlet) as their first choice rather than a torrent site. It's pretty bad when Ubisoft's DRM system has managed to make me even think about considering torrenting the game instead of buying it just to avoid the authentication problems, considering how I feel about how wrong theft is--and let's face it, torrenting is theft. Instead of buying the PC game which I'd rather have, I may just rent it for the 360. I'd like to play the game itself since the Renaissance is one of my absolute favorite historical time periods, but I sure don't want to support this DRM policy with my dollars.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 10:25 AM   #73
Samuel Dravis
 
Samuel Dravis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrotoy7 View Post
One thing that is clear - whatever happens with this over the next few weeks/months could be hugely influential on policies adopted on other games and by other publishers. You can bet EA is watching with great interest.

mtfbwya



It was necessary! xD


"Words are deeds." - Wittgenstein
Samuel Dravis is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 11:18 AM   #74
Lynk Former
internet hate machine
 
Lynk Former's Avatar
 
Status: Administrator
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,974
10 year veteran! The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer LF Jester 
Okay things are getting convoluted in here now... so I'll just put out a question.

There's always going to be piracy in some form as long as we have to pay for any sort of media. No matter what kind of DRM is put into a game, there'll be someone around the world who will be able to bypass it and then spread it to the rest of the world which means that all that effort to add the DRM into the game was a wasted effort in the first place. So, after that happens, why is it still necessary to shackle down and punish the rest of the audience who haven't pirated their game?

@ Astro: DRM is like the Rudd governments futile attempts to censor the internet.

Lynk Former is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 12:13 PM   #75
Astrotoy7
A Face from The Past
 
Astrotoy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,284
Notable contributor Helpful! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynk Former View Post
@ Astro: DRM is like the Rudd governments futile attempts to censor the internet.
ubisoft is trying to protect our children from pedophiles!

but yes, the 'poorly implemented' part of that analogy is on the money

@Samuel Dravis If only EA was EP, that would be so much cooler!! XP

mtfbwya


Asinus asinum fricat
Astrotoy7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 01:24 PM   #76
swphreak
My cabbages!!!
 
swphreak's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,510
10 year veteran! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran 
I wonder how much it costs to implement these DRM solutions. I can't imagine Ubi's new system is cheap - 24x7 servers, bandwidth, employees to monitor the DRM. If they didn't have any DRM, they could have just saved their money.

Piracy is unstoppable and resisting it is futile.
swphreak is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 02:07 PM   #77
Alexrd
Senior Member
 
Alexrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,150
Current Game: UEFA Euro 2004
Forum Veteran LF Jester 
Quote:
Originally Posted by StarWarsPhreak View Post
I wonder how much it costs to implement these DRM solutions. I can't imagine Ubi's new system is cheap - 24x7 servers, bandwidth, employees to monitor the DRM. If they didn't have any DRM, they could have just saved their money.

Piracy is unstoppable and resisting it is futile.
And those who get the game legally have to pay for those who get it on alternative ways...

And it's not just in games. All those warnings on DVD's too.
Alexrd is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 03:03 PM   #78
Prime
Am I a truck or robot?
 
Prime's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cybertron
Posts: 12,345
Current Game: Skyrim, Macross PS2
10 year veteran! LF Jester Veteran Modder Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynk Former View Post
Okay things are getting convoluted in here now... so I'll just put out a question.

There's always going to be piracy in some form as long as we have to pay for any sort of media. No matter what kind of DRM is put into a game, there'll be someone around the world who will be able to bypass it and then spread it to the rest of the world which means that all that effort to add the DRM into the game was a wasted effort in the first place. So, after that happens, why is it still necessary to shackle down and punish the rest of the audience who haven't pirated their game?

@ Astro: DRM is like the Rudd governments futile attempts to censor the internet.
On put out console releases?

Prime is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 04:42 PM   #79
Revan 411
Forumite
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrotoy7
You can bet EA is watching with great interest.
I personally think E.A's method of fighting piracy is better then any other methods of DRM that I can think of. Cerberus Network = FTW. Ubisoft lost all their brain-cells when they started developing their own unique piracy resistances. We should applaud them for making a successful pricey resistance's method that has absolutely no flaws and is 100% perfect.

Yeah, I'm done being sarcastic.

In all seriousness though, I think every PC game out there should use a combination of E.A's and Valve's method. Release free DLC to first hand copy owners and have people activate the game online via Steam. That way, you not only stop piracy, but you also have the legitimate consumers more happier with their products. Although, I seriously hope that developers don't release PC games online only for purchase. Unlike most of you, I prefer owning a retail copy. At least I can buy those.

Because.. I'm under 18. And don't have a credit card to buy online.



Last edited by Revan 411; 03-09-2010 at 09:02 PM.
Revan 411 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-09-2010, 06:37 PM   #80
Lord of Hunger
Hunger, The Lord Of
 
Lord of Hunger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Korriban, Sith Empire
Posts: 1,022
Current Game: Shogun 2: Total War
In terms of DRM, Steam is the only functional system. It actually rewards gamers for using it by giving them the ability to preserve their game indefinitely online. All you need is a Steam account and a credit card.


As of 3/14/10, TSL is restored. The Sith Lords Restored Content Modification by Stoney and Zbyl has been finished and can be downloaded here.

Lord of Hunger is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > Knights of the Old Republic > Community > Ahto Spaceport Cantina > Ubisoft plans to require constant net connection just to play their games

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.