lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar

Thread: Political Orientation
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 02-27-2010, 06:11 AM   #1
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Political Orientation

While there have been 2 or three threads similiar to this in the last 3 years, I don't recall this system being used. It's a quick 10 question quiz. Where did you fall on this one and is it where you thought....

http://www.nolanchart.com/survey.php


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 07:15 AM   #2
The Betrayer
Forumite
 
The Betrayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 716
Current Game: The Godfather II
Helpful! 
Nolan Chart says I'm Centrist, moving slightly toward Statist and Liberal. Can't say I disagree, though most of those issues aren't here in my country.



OMNIA MUTANTUR NIHIL INTERIT.
The Betrayer is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 07:36 AM   #3
mimartin
TOR ate my KotOR
 
mimartin's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,052
Current Game: TOR/FO:NV
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Alderaan News Holopics contributor 
"Your answers suggest that you are a centrist"

Did not like the practically like the questions on the test either. For example: While I support individual gun ownership that does not change my interpretation of the Second Amendment. Also not really happy with the vague reply either of “mentally unstable people.” As defined by who? Same types of problems with Questions; 4. Foreign Policy, 5. National ID Card, 6 Corporate Welfare, 7 Trade and Money, 8 Social Security, 9 Health Care, 10 Taxes, Spending… Test just seems too short and restrictive to give an accurate result.


mimartin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 08:04 AM   #4
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
As I always do on these things, I'm centrist although, like most of these, I take issue with the wording of some of the answers. Particularly in this one there were a few answers that seemed to be more redundant and too similar.

Between Liberal and Conservative I hit dead center in the middle, but oddly enough my star was a little down to Statism. Now, to be honest, I knew the word but had no idea what that meant so I looked it up and, well, not too thrilled with the philosophy but, then again, I also dislike libertarianism as well so... there is that.

A few things to mention:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Speech
"Speech, assembly, press, and Internet should be free except when it comes to protecting against terrorism and other threats to public safety. Free speech zones can be established to protect the right of free speech while insuring security at public events. Eminent domain should be maintained in practice, but it should not be available merely as a means to enrich private developers via enforced land transfers."
Chose this simply because I think too much of a single thing can be harmful. I very much enjoy my "free" speech, but don't really have a problem with the FBI, for example, paying Hal Turner a visit when he posts the names and addresses of judges and tells his fans to kill them. Defamation in the wrong hands can also greatly ruin people's lives.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guns
In general, I support the right to bear arms. However, it is prudent to have government regulate arms via registration requirements and other regulations to ensure that mentally unstable people can't get guns and go on shooting rampages.
Pretty self explanatory and think this is probably the view of most. This particularly comes to mind when I was sitting in on a judge running through people and taking away wife beater's and drunk driver's right to bear guns in Cali for a few years. While it does infringe on their rights, I do think you give up certain rights when you prove yourself to be mentally unstable or misguided. I'm also not really for nukes being sold at wal-mart, so I'm pretty OK with most gun regulations as of now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homosexual Marriage
Undecided.
Anyone who knows me might find this a little out of character for me, but when I really sit back and think about it I'm basically torn between "Allow rights" and "it should be voted in".

I used to just ****ing snap at people when this topic was brought up, but when Prop 8 passed here in California it basically broke me on this topic. Sort of started to sink into depression after it passed, and particularly after something said by GTA:SWcity the topic basically went limp and fell over for me.

After a lot of soul searching and research I basically admitted defeat to myself and gave in. In a perfect world, I'd say "Absolutely yes" but this is reality and I'd prefer public approval over forced reformation. But, looking through history and studying in sociology I have also basically accepted that is never going to happen.

I answered Fully Supported, but really I stopped caring or hoping awhile ago.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foreign Policy
Undecided
In the end I finally chose "America should play an active role in world affairs", but I thought ever one of the answers was poorly written and even more poorly thought out for a test. I really only chose it because it was seemingly the only option that took public opinion into account.

However, I take particular issue with this answer:
"'Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none,' said President Thomas Jefferson in his first inaugural address. America's interventionist policies over the past 100+ years have done little or nothing to reduce international instability, have led us into an endless series of wars, and have cost us dearly in American lives and money. The best defense of our borders is to defend our rights and liberty, not to sacrifice them while constantly growing our gigantic military, led by a parade of Presidents who repeatedly stick our nose into other countries' affairs."

Thomas Jefferson's quote was a warning that would eventually come true with the alliances forged that eventually gave way to the two World Wars. It was not so much friendship but an obligation to ally with other countries. Entanglement if you will.

However, the rest of that answer takes that quote and spits on its face. I find the rest of it to be both an offense to the quote, and an offense to history. The idea that there has been no change in international stability in 100+ years is the stupidest ****ing thing I've read in awhile.

While the last two sentences are reasonable, adding the Jefferson quote and the "no change in 100+ years" makes me question the validity of this test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by National ID Card
What?
Ok, this one actually had me double take. What is the idea of a National ID Card? Isn't that what a passport sort of is? State License? Car License?

Could someone fill me in?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corporate Welfare
Government involvement is necessary where private industry can't do the job all by itself. As an example, agricultural subsidies should continue to support small farmers.
While I do not support the bailing out of the Banks or the Big 3, keeping a net under things like agricultural is a good investment. The agricultural crash in the Great Depression is a good example of why having no net can be devastating.

The rest of the questions... meh, nothing worth mentioning. My issues with the test may be self explanatory in my Centrist outcome, though.

Overall, I've seen better tests and thought this was poorly written and restrictive.

Last edited by True_Avery; 02-27-2010 at 08:12 AM.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 08:55 AM   #5
jonathan7
Exiled Jedi...
 
jonathan7's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ivory Tower
Posts: 3,676
Contest winner - Modding LFN Staff Member Veteran Modder Helpful! 
I broke the test... It continually had a problem loading the page for my result.

I think your American software couldn't handle the liberalness of the European



"Love is the only reality and it is not a mere sentiment. It is the ultimate truth that lies at the heart of creation." - Rabindranath Tagore

"Many a doctrine is like a window pane. We see truth through it but it divides us from truth." - Kahlil Gibran
jonathan7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 11:08 AM   #6
Ping
Elementary.
 
Ping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 786
Roleplayer 
The thing said I'm a liberal, and I seem to be closer to the statist side of the chart, too.


"There is no such thing as coincidence, only inevitability" - xxxHoLiC

"Justice? But I don't serve justice, Watson, I serve the truth." - Sherlock Holmes
Ping is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 11:48 AM   #7
Web Rider
Senior Member
 
Web Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: here
Posts: 1,768
I generally kind I'm moderate with socialist leanings. But yeah, test is borked.


"So if you go to Washington, it's buildings clean and nice. Bring a pack of matches...and we'll burn the White House twice!"

"Nobody's talking about extermination. No one ever does. They just do it." - Magneto

"Don't solicit for your sister, that's not nice, unless you get a good percentage of her price."
Web Rider is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 12:23 PM   #8
Litofsky
Galaxial
 
Litofsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,546
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathan7 View Post
I broke the test... It continually had a problem loading the page for my result.

I think your American software couldn't handle the liberalness of the European
I regret to say that I couldn't access the test, either. Though, Jon, it might be equally afraid of what happens if a 'Southerner' takes the test as a Brit.
Litofsky is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 12:26 PM   #9
mimartin
TOR ate my KotOR
 
mimartin's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,052
Current Game: TOR/FO:NV
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Alderaan News Holopics contributor 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathan7 View Post
I broke the test... It continually had a problem loading the page for my result.

I think your American software couldn't handle the liberalness of the European
No, I can no longer load it either, but the test was broke even before the page went down.


mimartin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 01:44 PM   #10
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,916
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
See, I would have pegged Web Rider as pretty liberal, jonathan7 as very liberal on some things but conservative on others, True_Avery as very liberal and me as centrist-right (very conservative on some things, liberal on some others). I didn't get a chance to see the test yet, however.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 02:14 PM   #11
Astor
It's Thornhill!
 
Astor's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Warwickshire, UK
Posts: 3,632
Current Game: The Old Republic
LFN Staff Member Forum Veteran Helpful! 
I tried the test earlier, apparently i'm a centrist liberal libertarian (at least I think that's what it said), although I couldn't see the chart and where I was in relation to other viewpoints.






Astor is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 02:36 PM   #12
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Onasi View Post
True_Avery as very liberal
One of the only things I consider myself very liberal with is same-sex marriage. I'm pretty moderate/indifferent on most everything else, mainly because most issues don't affect me directly. If I'm reacting to something its either out of my own confusion on the topic, or more an issue with the person and not the topic.

Very liberal people go out on marches, have stickers on their car, and are pro-choice/pro-same-sex/anti-death penalty/anti-torture, etc. See, that is my mother.

I, however, am only strictly pro-same-sex with almost no drive to defend the position anymore.

Last edited by True_Avery; 02-27-2010 at 02:51 PM.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 03:16 PM   #13
jrrtoken
Senior Member
 
jrrtoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,995
Labeling others is arrogant... but the fact that I'm even saying this would probably place me as a liberal sodomite.
jrrtoken is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 03:19 PM   #14
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,916
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
You can be liberal without being the activist that your mother is, however. I'm pretty liberal on environmental issues (on the theory that if we pollute ourselves so much that we die off, there won't be anyone left to do business). However, the only thing I do activist-wise is feed the wild birds in my backyard and do backyard bird counts and then submit the data to eBird so Cornell University and the Audubon Society can use the data for research. I'm very conservative on pro-life issues, but I don't get activist about it. I think it's far more useful to just help the women who are in a situation of an unexpected pregnancy with practical things like diapers and baby clothes.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 03:40 PM   #15
jonathan7
Exiled Jedi...
 
jonathan7's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ivory Tower
Posts: 3,676
Contest winner - Modding LFN Staff Member Veteran Modder Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PastramiX View Post
Labeling others is arrogant...
Isn't that a self defeating statement as you've just labelled others



"Love is the only reality and it is not a mere sentiment. It is the ultimate truth that lies at the heart of creation." - Rabindranath Tagore

"Many a doctrine is like a window pane. We see truth through it but it divides us from truth." - Kahlil Gibran
jonathan7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 04:00 PM   #16
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
Quote:
....but the fact that I'm even saying this would probably place me as a liberal sodomite.
Well, you know those liberal sodomites, Jon, they just can't control their urges.

RE the quiz, I thought it a bit short and somewhat unsatisfactory also. Just like mimartin's doubts about the issue of "mental instability", I have problems with ambiguous terms like "other threats to public safety". As defined by? Also, the foreign policy question seemed to leave you with 3 basic choices: being a total busy-body in the name of national interests--no matter the cost, caving in to the UN or a form of isolationism. I think they should have refined that first answer at the very least and that to argue that America's interventionism over the last 100 years has done little or nothing for international stability is dubious at best.

Also, this rationale
Quote:
Government involvement is necessary where private industry can't do the job all by itself. As an example, agricultural subsidies should continue to support small farmers
could be used to justify a natioanl healthcare system that would end up as a govt single-payer entity. Even Barney Frank has conceded that that is the ultimate goal of the progressives in govt via a "public option" camels' nose-in-the-tent approach.


The Nolan Chart website has experienced a major server crash.
Please check back with us in a day or two, to give us time to recover from it.
Thank you for your patience and support.


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman

Last edited by Totenkopf; 02-27-2010 at 06:02 PM.
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 08:48 PM   #17
Web Rider
Senior Member
 
Web Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: here
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Onasi View Post
See, I would have pegged Web Rider as pretty liberal, jonathan7 as very liberal on some things but conservative on others, True_Avery as very liberal and me as centrist-right (very conservative on some things, liberal on some others). I didn't get a chance to see the test yet, however.
That's because we never discuss anything here that I lean to the (american)right on. It's not real easy to see my conservative side as there are few issues that bring it up. EX: I'm very pro-gun rights, I'm big on personal freedoms, and I'm quite in favor of the death penalty, among other forms of corrective punishment.


"So if you go to Washington, it's buildings clean and nice. Bring a pack of matches...and we'll burn the White House twice!"

"Nobody's talking about extermination. No one ever does. They just do it." - Magneto

"Don't solicit for your sister, that's not nice, unless you get a good percentage of her price."
Web Rider is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 09:47 PM   #18
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Hm. Linky no worky.
But I was deemed slightly left of center in the last "political compass" test. But, then again, according to the questions asked by that test, anyone right of center is a bigoted "we don't want their kind around these here parts" neo-nazi, so I'm guessing that I'd be slightly right of center with this one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
Anyone who knows me might find this a little out of character for me, but when I really sit back and think about it I'm basically torn between "Allow rights" and "it should be voted in".

I used to just ****ing snap at people when this topic was brought up, but when Prop 8 passed here in California it basically broke me on this topic. Sort of started to sink into depression after it passed, and particularly after something said by GTA:SWcity the topic basically went limp and fell over for me.

After a lot of soul searching and research I basically admitted defeat to myself and gave in. In a perfect world, I'd say "Absolutely yes" but this is reality and I'd prefer public approval over forced reformation. But, looking through history and studying in sociology I have also basically accepted that is never going to happen.
As someone who was conscious of his surroundings during the 1980s I can say with a fair amount of confidence that you should probably not be so depressed about this. Homosexuals were regarded as something less than human back then. I know, because I was there.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-27-2010, 11:34 PM   #19
mimartin
TOR ate my KotOR
 
mimartin's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,052
Current Game: TOR/FO:NV
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Alderaan News Holopics contributor 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
As someone who was conscious of his surroundings during the 1980s I can say with a fair amount of confidence that you should probably not be so depressed about this. Homosexuals were regarded as something less than human back then. I know, because I was there.
Very true, during the starts of the HIV crisis people were even talking serious about sending homosexual males to an island somewhere.

While the first cases of AIDS were discovered in 1981, President Ronald Reagan never addressed the subject until May 31. 1987 after 36,058 Americans had been diagnosed with disease and 20,849 had died of AIDS. According to Reagan’s Surgeon General, Dr. C. Everett Koop, the white house belived "because transmission of AIDS was understood to be primarily in the homosexual population and in those who abused intravenous drugs…They were only getting what they justly deserved”

That kind of narrow minded thinking cost my best friend his father. His dad got a blood transfusion in 1984 during open heart surgery. Died a few years later of AIDS, thanks to the forward thinking of Reagan and the bean counters that thought it was too expensive and would bankrupt the blood banks to test the blood supply. Funny it seems the blood banks are not bankrupt since we started testing the blood.


mimartin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 03:26 AM   #20
True_Avery
Banned
 
Status: Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Q View Post
As someone who was conscious of his surroundings during the 1980s I can say with a fair amount of confidence that you should probably not be so depressed about this. Homosexuals were regarded as something less than human back then. I know, because I was there.
Indeed, I can't deny that there are times and places where thinks would be worse.

But, in my own subjective experiences it depressed me. I put a lot of vestment into the people, and threw a lot of hope into the result especially since I had just helped two friends marry after 15 years together. The results came in and it wasn't a land slide, but it was still pretty crushing.

It was a heavy topic in the schools, the news, the forums, and I got into my fare share of debates and even led a debate on the subject. It grated on my nerves enough that I perhaps put too much investment into the final result; I honestly cared about the outcome of Prop 8 more than the Presidential Election or anything else on the card. My "No On 8" signs were being stolen left and right, there was not a street corner without at least 5 Yes signs in the ground, and all over the country Yes was getting incredible amounts of funding and backing.

It passed, and it knocked the wind out of me. For the moment, my friends had just had their marriage nullified and It had been made a constitutional amendment in the state I planned to spend most if not the rest of my life in (partly due to my career track). I had held back a lot of feelings from school on the subject, and this was just finally the last straw for me.

Couldn't comprehend why. So, I did some soul searching and delved into history and tried to educate myself best I could on the history of LGBT rights to try to get a firmer, better understanding, this time with some basic knowledge of sociology to help decipher, as well as trying to understand more of the psychology behind sexuality.

After soul searching with the info and with plenty of comments in and out of the forum I decided to give up on the subject. Its a dead-end topic with a predictable outcome that repeats and shows itself everywhere, with the end result basing a "rational" aversion. After delving into the psychology of the topic I found that the positions I thought were dead wrong before were probably more dead on than I realized.

I lost my drive to support the topic. Does that make me naive, ignorant, and spoiled of the experiences those before me had? Yes, and I probably have little right to be depressed. If anything, I'm a coward.

I fully expect a strong conservative/religious movement to undo what has been done so far so, from my point of view, I don't really have any reason not to see myself as an abomination and the support of the topic to be anything other than pointless. I'm a defeatist on this, so sue me.

Last edited by True_Avery; 02-28-2010 at 05:22 AM.
True_Avery is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 05:58 AM   #21
mur'phon
Whale eating vegetarian
 
mur'phon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southier than thou
Posts: 1,537
Forum Veteran 
My political views are so all over the place and context sensitive (I like to pretend this is due to me being a pragmatist) that tests tend to place me all over the place. The exeption being privacy issues, where I want the government far far away. As an example I support a massive carbon tax in just about every western country, while at the same time opposing it in most of the LDC countries.


Checking out seems not to do much.
mur'phon is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 08:30 AM   #22
The Betrayer
Forumite
 
The Betrayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 716
Current Game: The Godfather II
Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by True_Avery View Post
Ok, this one actually had me double take. What is the idea of a National ID Card? Isn't that what a passport sort of is? State License? Car License?

Could someone fill me in?
A National ID System is very different from a passport or a driver's license, True_Avery.

Quote:
A national identification number or National Identity Card number is used by the governments of many countries as a means of tracking their citizens, permanent residents, and temporary residents for the purposes of work, taxation, government benefits, health care, and other governmentally-related functions. Sometimes, the number will appear on an identity card issued by a country.
The main issue, at hand, of course, is the privacy of the user. And although it might provide an additional layer of protection from terrorism, the government also gains the ability to track its citizens. Here's a link for further reading.



OMNIA MUTANTUR NIHIL INTERIT.
The Betrayer is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 02:59 PM   #23
mimartin
TOR ate my KotOR
 
mimartin's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,052
Current Game: TOR/FO:NV
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Alderaan News Holopics contributor 
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Betrayer View Post
The main issue, at hand, of course, is the privacy of the user. And although it might provide an additional layer of protection from terrorism, the government also gains the ability to track its citizens. Here's a link for further reading.
I can't really say where I stand on the National ID, but law abiding citizens are easily tracked by the government, banking, credit, health care and insurance industries with a little thing called the social security number.

As someone on the watch list, because my name is the same as someone on the no fly list, I am unsure how I feel about a national ID card. If it is to be administered by the worse government agency ever designed, Homeland Security, then I am totally against national ID cards.


mimartin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 04:13 PM   #24
Web Rider
Senior Member
 
Web Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: here
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimartin View Post
I can't really say where I stand on the National ID, but law abiding citizens are easily tracked by the government, banking, credit, health care and insurance industries with a little thing called the social security number.
You are right that if the government WANTS to track you, it will. That has always been true, a new card will not really change this. Certainly it may make things easier, but lets face it, the government really isn't going to be tracking everyone on a regular basis. And even if they did, it would be only a cursory evaluation, they simply don't have the time or money to figure out if every person is having regular bowel movements.

I think a National ID card would be a good idea, if only to standardize licenses/IDs across state, I mean, I have no idea if the guy with the Minnesota ID is using a fake, I don't know what a Minnesota ID looks like out in California.

Quote:
As someone on the watch list, because my name is the same as someone on the no fly list, I am unsure how I feel about a national ID card. If it is to be administered by the worse government agency ever designed, Homeland Security, then I am totally against national ID cards.
Change your name. That's the hilarity of it. All you have to do is make a minor change to your name, and suddenly "The List" won't pick you up anymore. It's the most idiotic way to check for terrorists ever.

TSA: "Oh, you said your name was John Smith? You're on the list. Sorry."
two days later:
TSA: "Oh hi again, you said your name was Johan Schmidt? Go right ahead!"

Yeah....


"So if you go to Washington, it's buildings clean and nice. Bring a pack of matches...and we'll burn the White House twice!"

"Nobody's talking about extermination. No one ever does. They just do it." - Magneto

"Don't solicit for your sister, that's not nice, unless you get a good percentage of her price."
Web Rider is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 07:07 PM   #25
mimartin
TOR ate my KotOR
 
mimartin's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,052
Current Game: TOR/FO:NV
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Alderaan News Holopics contributor 
From what Homeland Stupidity informed me, a name change would not work. It could just be that they put all forms of a name into the data base. So if your name was Robert Smith, you could not change it to Rob Smith, Bobby Smith, Roberto Smith, or Bob Smith to invade the list. If one form of someone’s name is on the list then every form of that name is on the list. Kind of understandable why the list grew so big, so fast and is now more a hindrance to security and not the tool it was advertised to be.


mimartin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 07:33 PM   #26
Web Rider
Senior Member
 
Web Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: here
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimartin View Post
From what Homeland Stupidity informed me, a name change would not work. It could just be that they put all forms of a name into the data base. So if your name was Robert Smith, you could not change it to Rob Smith, Bobby Smith, Roberto Smith, or Bob Smith to invade the list. If one form of someone’s name is on the list then every form of that name is on the list. Kind of understandable why the list grew so big, so fast and is now more a hindrance to security and not the tool it was advertised to be.
Strange, the guy I read about just added like a middle-name or something and bam, nobody looked at him.


"So if you go to Washington, it's buildings clean and nice. Bring a pack of matches...and we'll burn the White House twice!"

"Nobody's talking about extermination. No one ever does. They just do it." - Magneto

"Don't solicit for your sister, that's not nice, unless you get a good percentage of her price."
Web Rider is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 09:20 PM   #27
mimartin
TOR ate my KotOR
 
mimartin's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,052
Current Game: TOR/FO:NV
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Alderaan News Holopics contributor 
That is what I wanted to do. I was just going to change my middle name to an initial or shorten my first name. There was no way I was going to change my sir name (out of respect for my dad). I’ve just decided not to fly as often as I use to, sorry airlines. Now I only fly for really important trips (Texas Longhorn Football).


mimartin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 02-28-2010, 11:08 PM   #28
Darth Avlectus
If Sunday you're free...
 
Darth Avlectus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Why don't you come with me...
Posts: 4,267
Current Game: Poisoning pigeons in the park.
The test: It ar broak'n.

Issue: Free Speech

Let it all hang out. I believe duking it out should be a part of it where that guy in apartment 408A refuses to just STFU b/c the world doesn't revolve around him and it isn't everyone else's fault his dogs bark at every little thing while he is hung over.
=====================
Issue: Guns
If you know me this one reqires no explanation. If ya don't know, take a look at my username and then take a wild guess what I think about guns.
=====================
Issue: Homosexuals
no comment
=====================
Issue: USA's role in the world
they didn't have an apathy option.
no comment
=====================
Int'l. trade

I personally was negatively affected by nafta as were friends and family. So if I sound a little pissed off when I talk about it, umm, yeah. And I have a nonpartisan source to back me, not just Glenn Beck though I'm sure he'd love to get his hands on this.

http://www.citizen.org/documents/NAFTA_10_jobs.pdf

So I'm _not_ just a bitter guy who got hit by the ugly end of the ugly beating stick. Door's open for a private chat if you don't like what I've said.
======================
Issue: National ID

No... Just, no. Not that I think it would do an effective job at protecting and securing people as our Gov't. claims it would. It is a power grab. This is merely hiring more bureaucracy and admin, while achieving more consolidation of power under one department, and expediting the process if the government wants to know every little thing about you at a whim.

N O

We need it b/c there are too many little agencies and one doesn't know what the other one is doing? I think it's just fine AS-IS. They can already contact each other quickly in this age. We need our checks and balances.

As if privacy isn't ALREADY on a collision course with copyrights. Ask Black Knight of Keno what his signature is talking about.
========================
Health Care:
It needs reform, yes. To what degree and where is the question. I can't be too sure.

I know a "loser pays" rule applying specifically to cases found to be frivolous would end that crap REAL quick. Just a suggestion, I mean that if lawsuits are what is primarily behind the costs being so high.
=========================
Issue: Corporate welfare

I'm just going to yell HAAX! and throw a computer monitor at nafta again when it comes to the farms. It eventually stems from that.

EDIT: Perhaps I'm not clear here. I'm all for American farming jobs because it is strategically wise in case we have a large scale natural disaster that ends up isolating us from the rest of the world or just wreaking havoc in general and we need food NOW as opposed to waiting for it to ship to us from elsewhere in the world. HOWEVER I know USA farming is largely related to why Mexico has lost *their* farming economy hence our problem with so many illegal aliens from Mexico. In general also, I despise bailouts.

Bringing me to my next point: Bailouts...I don't like them. Yet I hear it would be worse if we didn't have them. Until I have solid proof that the institutions won't botch it all again, I'll remain skeptical. Regulations to prevent this self destruction were removed systematically and subtly over time--WHY?!

It's just all a lot of BS to me. Damned if you do, Damned if you don't.

Last edited by Darth Avlectus; 03-01-2010 at 08:03 PM. Reason: explained corporate welfare better
Darth Avlectus is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-01-2010, 09:04 AM   #29
Gurges-Ahter
Tyler Durden
 
Gurges-Ahter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Parker, TX
Posts: 957
I fell close to the middle of the conservative area.


Gurges-Ahter is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 04:35 PM   #30
urluckyday
Up all night to get lucky
 
urluckyday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Beautiful USA
Posts: 2,760
Current Game: Red Orchestra 2
10 year veteran! Forum Veteran 
"Conservative"

The star is just outside the Centrist...by all accounts, that sounds about right...



If I die today, I'm happy how my life turned out
urluckyday is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 05:09 PM   #31
Darth Avlectus
If Sunday you're free...
 
Darth Avlectus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Why don't you come with me...
Posts: 4,267
Current Game: Poisoning pigeons in the park.
"Libertarian"

With the star leaning to the right, nearing the conservative border but still in the libertarian zone. While I suppose this fits me, the quiz lacked *so* much consideration and nuance I had to force myself into whatever of their answers came closest to what I think and believe, and even then it was with grinding chafe.


We'll murder them all, amid laughter and merriment...except for the few we take home to experiment!

"I cant see S***! --YOU GO TO HELL!" --Tourettes guy
Darth Avlectus is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 05:31 PM   #32
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Same here. Libertarian.


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-02-2010, 06:53 PM   #33
Totenkopf
English spoken in What
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: What?
Posts: 4,787
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Member The Walking Carpets Guild Member Forum Veteran 
I ended up halfway along the outside wall of Liberatarian (on the conservative side of graph, naturally. ).


Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country.---Patton

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.---Teddy Roosevelt

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception.---Groucho

And if you all get killed, I'll piss on your graves.---Shaman Urdnot

How would you like to own a little bit of my foot in your ass.---Red Foreman
Totenkopf is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-04-2010, 12:42 PM   #34
ForeverNight
nrgurt researcher
 
ForeverNight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 1,204
Current Game: q2
Took it, mid way up in the libertarian point, half way to the right within that.... Eh, I still like the Political Compass more though :\


ForeverNight is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-04-2010, 08:01 PM   #35
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,916
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
I read through the first question. I read through the second question. I decided the test questions and answers are constructed so poorly that a freshman psych major would be kicked out of class for making something that bad. I couldn't go on trying to answer seriously.

Question 1: Free speech and eminent domain are two entirely different questions, yet they're somehow lumped together here.

Question 2: "ensure that mentally unstable people can't get guns and go on shooting rampages". Sure--no bias in the wording there whatsoever. Nope. None. And that's just that 1 choice. The rest are just as bad.

Question 3: "Homosexuality is an abomination..." I think I wanted to throw up when I read that choice.

Question 4: We get the lovely choices of being the world's bullies, working towards a one-world government where our domestic policy of big government is somehow extrapolated to world government, or isolationists who've stuck our noses where they don't belong. The military is worked in there in varying degrees of lack of success.

Question 5: Choice a. We'll lose our privacy! Choice b. We'll lose our privacy! Choice c. We'll lose our privacy! Choice d. Only the guilty care about losing their privacy!

Question 6: Do you like your government big, bigger, extra-large, or 'super-size-me!'?

Question 7: Choice a: We want free trade that's fair while we do our best Robin Hood 'rob the evil rich people who are suppressing the poor' impersonation. No contradictions there at all.

Question 8: We either play Robin Hood again (complete with prancing in green tights), or we get out from under a pyramid scheme. Nice choices there.

Question 9: Conspicuously absent from these choices--corporate greed and fraud have caused insane increases in our health care.

Question 10: Choice 3 takes the cake here. "We should balance the budget, but we should expand the national debt as needed." Um, explain to me how you expand the national debt by balancing the budget, please?


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 03-05-2010, 12:24 PM   #36
Trench
Guy with Monocle
 
Trench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Under a rock.
Posts: 1,638
Current Game: DX:HR, iKotOR
LF Jester 
@Quiz: I lol'd.

My 5 year old niece could write a better quiz.

Qouted for excellence:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae
I read through the first question. I read through the second question. I decided the test questions and answers are constructed so poorly that a freshman psych major would be kicked out of class for making something that bad. I couldn't go on trying to answer seriously.

Question 1: Free speech and eminent domain are two entirely different questions, yet they're somehow lumped together here.

Question 2: "ensure that mentally unstable people can't get guns and go on shooting rampages". Sure--no bias in the wording there whatsoever. Nope. None. And that's just that 1 choice. The rest are just as bad.

Question 3: "Homosexuality is an abomination..." I think I wanted to throw up when I read that choice.

Question 4: We get the lovely choices of being the world's bullies, working towards a one-world government where our domestic policy of big government is somehow extrapolated to world government, or isolationists who've stuck our noses where they don't belong. The military is worked in there in varying degrees of lack of success.

Question 5: Choice a. We'll lose our privacy! Choice b. We'll lose our privacy! Choice c. We'll lose our privacy! Choice d. Only the guilty care about losing their privacy!

Question 6: Do you like your government big, bigger, extra-large, or 'super-size-me!'?

Question 7: Choice a: We want free trade that's fair while we do our best Robin Hood 'rob the evil rich people who are suppressing the poor' impersonation. No contradictions there at all.

Question 8: We either play Robin Hood again (complete with prancing in green tights), or we get out from under a pyramid scheme. Nice choices there.

Question 9: Conspicuously absent from these choices--corporate greed and fraud have caused insane increases in our health care.

Question 10: Choice 3 takes the cake here. "We should balance the budget, but we should expand the national debt as needed." Um, explain to me how you expand the national debt by balancing the budget, please?

Trench is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > Knights of the Old Republic > Community > Kavar's Corner > Political Orientation

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.